Cargando…
Developing quality criteria for patient‐directed knowledge tools related to clinical practice guidelines. A development and consensus study
BACKGROUND: Patient‐directed knowledge tools such as patient versions of guidelines and patient decision aids are increasingly developed to facilitate shared decision making. In this paper, we report how consensus was reached within the Netherlands on quality criteria for development, content and go...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6433309/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30417517 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.12843 |
_version_ | 1783406279326171136 |
---|---|
author | van der Weijden, Trudy Dreesens, Dunja Faber, Marjan J. Bos, Nanne Drenthen, Ton Maas, Ingrid Kersten, Sonja Malanda, Uriëll van der Scheur, Sander Post, Heleen Knops, Anouk |
author_facet | van der Weijden, Trudy Dreesens, Dunja Faber, Marjan J. Bos, Nanne Drenthen, Ton Maas, Ingrid Kersten, Sonja Malanda, Uriëll van der Scheur, Sander Post, Heleen Knops, Anouk |
author_sort | van der Weijden, Trudy |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Patient‐directed knowledge tools such as patient versions of guidelines and patient decision aids are increasingly developed to facilitate shared decision making. In this paper, we report how consensus was reached within the Netherlands on quality criteria for development, content and governance of these tools. METHOD: A 12‐month development and consensus study. The consortium worked on four work packages: (a) reviewing existing criteria; (b) drafting the quality criteria; (c) safe‐guarding the acceptability and feasibility of the draft criteria by participatory research in on‐going tool development projects; and (d) gaining formal support from national stakeholders on the quality criteria. RESULTS: We reached consensus on a 8‐step guidance; describing minimal quality criteria for (a) the team composition; (b) setting the scope; (c) identifying needs; (d) the content and format; (e) testing the draft; (f) finalizing and approval; (g) dissemination and application, and (h) ownership and revision. The participants of the on‐going tool development projects were positive about the quality criteria in general, but divided as to the degree of detail. Whereas some expressed a clear desire for procedural standards, others felt that it would be sufficient to provide only general directions. Despite the different views as to the degree of detail, consensus was reached in three stakeholder meetings. DISCUSSION: We successfully collaborated with all stakeholders and achieved formal support from national stakeholders on a set of minimum criteria for the development process, content and governance of patient‐directed knowledge tools. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6433309 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64333092019-04-05 Developing quality criteria for patient‐directed knowledge tools related to clinical practice guidelines. A development and consensus study van der Weijden, Trudy Dreesens, Dunja Faber, Marjan J. Bos, Nanne Drenthen, Ton Maas, Ingrid Kersten, Sonja Malanda, Uriëll van der Scheur, Sander Post, Heleen Knops, Anouk Health Expect Original Research Papers BACKGROUND: Patient‐directed knowledge tools such as patient versions of guidelines and patient decision aids are increasingly developed to facilitate shared decision making. In this paper, we report how consensus was reached within the Netherlands on quality criteria for development, content and governance of these tools. METHOD: A 12‐month development and consensus study. The consortium worked on four work packages: (a) reviewing existing criteria; (b) drafting the quality criteria; (c) safe‐guarding the acceptability and feasibility of the draft criteria by participatory research in on‐going tool development projects; and (d) gaining formal support from national stakeholders on the quality criteria. RESULTS: We reached consensus on a 8‐step guidance; describing minimal quality criteria for (a) the team composition; (b) setting the scope; (c) identifying needs; (d) the content and format; (e) testing the draft; (f) finalizing and approval; (g) dissemination and application, and (h) ownership and revision. The participants of the on‐going tool development projects were positive about the quality criteria in general, but divided as to the degree of detail. Whereas some expressed a clear desire for procedural standards, others felt that it would be sufficient to provide only general directions. Despite the different views as to the degree of detail, consensus was reached in three stakeholder meetings. DISCUSSION: We successfully collaborated with all stakeholders and achieved formal support from national stakeholders on a set of minimum criteria for the development process, content and governance of patient‐directed knowledge tools. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-11-11 2019-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6433309/ /pubmed/30417517 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.12843 Text en © 2018 The Authors Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Papers van der Weijden, Trudy Dreesens, Dunja Faber, Marjan J. Bos, Nanne Drenthen, Ton Maas, Ingrid Kersten, Sonja Malanda, Uriëll van der Scheur, Sander Post, Heleen Knops, Anouk Developing quality criteria for patient‐directed knowledge tools related to clinical practice guidelines. A development and consensus study |
title | Developing quality criteria for patient‐directed knowledge tools related to clinical practice guidelines. A development and consensus study |
title_full | Developing quality criteria for patient‐directed knowledge tools related to clinical practice guidelines. A development and consensus study |
title_fullStr | Developing quality criteria for patient‐directed knowledge tools related to clinical practice guidelines. A development and consensus study |
title_full_unstemmed | Developing quality criteria for patient‐directed knowledge tools related to clinical practice guidelines. A development and consensus study |
title_short | Developing quality criteria for patient‐directed knowledge tools related to clinical practice guidelines. A development and consensus study |
title_sort | developing quality criteria for patient‐directed knowledge tools related to clinical practice guidelines. a development and consensus study |
topic | Original Research Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6433309/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30417517 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hex.12843 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanderweijdentrudy developingqualitycriteriaforpatientdirectedknowledgetoolsrelatedtoclinicalpracticeguidelinesadevelopmentandconsensusstudy AT dreesensdunja developingqualitycriteriaforpatientdirectedknowledgetoolsrelatedtoclinicalpracticeguidelinesadevelopmentandconsensusstudy AT fabermarjanj developingqualitycriteriaforpatientdirectedknowledgetoolsrelatedtoclinicalpracticeguidelinesadevelopmentandconsensusstudy AT bosnanne developingqualitycriteriaforpatientdirectedknowledgetoolsrelatedtoclinicalpracticeguidelinesadevelopmentandconsensusstudy AT drenthenton developingqualitycriteriaforpatientdirectedknowledgetoolsrelatedtoclinicalpracticeguidelinesadevelopmentandconsensusstudy AT maasingrid developingqualitycriteriaforpatientdirectedknowledgetoolsrelatedtoclinicalpracticeguidelinesadevelopmentandconsensusstudy AT kerstensonja developingqualitycriteriaforpatientdirectedknowledgetoolsrelatedtoclinicalpracticeguidelinesadevelopmentandconsensusstudy AT malandauriell developingqualitycriteriaforpatientdirectedknowledgetoolsrelatedtoclinicalpracticeguidelinesadevelopmentandconsensusstudy AT vanderscheursander developingqualitycriteriaforpatientdirectedknowledgetoolsrelatedtoclinicalpracticeguidelinesadevelopmentandconsensusstudy AT postheleen developingqualitycriteriaforpatientdirectedknowledgetoolsrelatedtoclinicalpracticeguidelinesadevelopmentandconsensusstudy AT knopsanouk developingqualitycriteriaforpatientdirectedknowledgetoolsrelatedtoclinicalpracticeguidelinesadevelopmentandconsensusstudy |