Cargando…

Effectiveness of Bi-Parametric MR/US Fusion Biopsy for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Prostate Biopsy Naïve Men

PURPOSE: To explore the effect of bi-parametric MRI-ultrasound (MR/US) fusion prostate biopsy on the detection of overall cancer and significant prostate cancer (sPCa). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined 140 patients with suspected prostate cancer lesions on MRI from August 2016 to March 2018. All p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Young Joo, Huh, Jung Sik, Park, Kyung Kgi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6433566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30900420
http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2019.60.4.346
_version_ 1783406297258917888
author Kim, Young Joo
Huh, Jung Sik
Park, Kyung Kgi
author_facet Kim, Young Joo
Huh, Jung Sik
Park, Kyung Kgi
author_sort Kim, Young Joo
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To explore the effect of bi-parametric MRI-ultrasound (MR/US) fusion prostate biopsy on the detection of overall cancer and significant prostate cancer (sPCa). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined 140 patients with suspected prostate cancer lesions on MRI from August 2016 to March 2018. All patients had undergone 3T pre-biopsy bi-parametric (T2 weighted and diffusion-weighted) prostate MRI (bpMRI), and their MRI images were evaluated with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2.0. MR/US fusion targeted prostate biopsy was performed for lesions with a PI-RADS score ≥3 before systemic biopsy. The results of targeted and systemic biopsy were evaluated in regards to detection rate according to PI-RADS score. RESULTS: Of the patients (mean age=67.2 years, mean prostate-specific antigen level=8.1 ng/mL), 66 (47.1%) and 37 (26.4%) patients were diagnosed with cancer and significant prostate cancer, respectively. The rate of positive targeted biopsy increased with higher PI-RADS score (3: 40.4%, 4: 56.7%, 5: 90.0%). The proportion of significant prostate cancer among positive target lesions was 65.3% (32/49). CONCLUSION: bpMRI is a feasible tool with which to identify sPCa. MR/US fusion biopsy, rather than systemic biopsy, can help identify sPCa. We recommend using supplemental tools to increase prostate cancer detection in patients with PI-RADS 3 lesions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6433566
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Yonsei University College of Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64335662019-04-02 Effectiveness of Bi-Parametric MR/US Fusion Biopsy for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Prostate Biopsy Naïve Men Kim, Young Joo Huh, Jung Sik Park, Kyung Kgi Yonsei Med J Original Article PURPOSE: To explore the effect of bi-parametric MRI-ultrasound (MR/US) fusion prostate biopsy on the detection of overall cancer and significant prostate cancer (sPCa). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined 140 patients with suspected prostate cancer lesions on MRI from August 2016 to March 2018. All patients had undergone 3T pre-biopsy bi-parametric (T2 weighted and diffusion-weighted) prostate MRI (bpMRI), and their MRI images were evaluated with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2.0. MR/US fusion targeted prostate biopsy was performed for lesions with a PI-RADS score ≥3 before systemic biopsy. The results of targeted and systemic biopsy were evaluated in regards to detection rate according to PI-RADS score. RESULTS: Of the patients (mean age=67.2 years, mean prostate-specific antigen level=8.1 ng/mL), 66 (47.1%) and 37 (26.4%) patients were diagnosed with cancer and significant prostate cancer, respectively. The rate of positive targeted biopsy increased with higher PI-RADS score (3: 40.4%, 4: 56.7%, 5: 90.0%). The proportion of significant prostate cancer among positive target lesions was 65.3% (32/49). CONCLUSION: bpMRI is a feasible tool with which to identify sPCa. MR/US fusion biopsy, rather than systemic biopsy, can help identify sPCa. We recommend using supplemental tools to increase prostate cancer detection in patients with PI-RADS 3 lesions. Yonsei University College of Medicine 2019-04-01 2019-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6433566/ /pubmed/30900420 http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2019.60.4.346 Text en © Copyright: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2019 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Young Joo
Huh, Jung Sik
Park, Kyung Kgi
Effectiveness of Bi-Parametric MR/US Fusion Biopsy for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Prostate Biopsy Naïve Men
title Effectiveness of Bi-Parametric MR/US Fusion Biopsy for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Prostate Biopsy Naïve Men
title_full Effectiveness of Bi-Parametric MR/US Fusion Biopsy for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Prostate Biopsy Naïve Men
title_fullStr Effectiveness of Bi-Parametric MR/US Fusion Biopsy for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Prostate Biopsy Naïve Men
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of Bi-Parametric MR/US Fusion Biopsy for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Prostate Biopsy Naïve Men
title_short Effectiveness of Bi-Parametric MR/US Fusion Biopsy for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Prostate Biopsy Naïve Men
title_sort effectiveness of bi-parametric mr/us fusion biopsy for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in prostate biopsy naïve men
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6433566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30900420
http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2019.60.4.346
work_keys_str_mv AT kimyoungjoo effectivenessofbiparametricmrusfusionbiopsyfordetectingclinicallysignificantprostatecancerinprostatebiopsynaivemen
AT huhjungsik effectivenessofbiparametricmrusfusionbiopsyfordetectingclinicallysignificantprostatecancerinprostatebiopsynaivemen
AT parkkyungkgi effectivenessofbiparametricmrusfusionbiopsyfordetectingclinicallysignificantprostatecancerinprostatebiopsynaivemen