Cargando…
Computed tomography evaluation of the periacetabular gap of a porous tantalum acetabular component
The periacetabular gap is an inherent consequence of the peripheral rim press-fit of the porous tantalum acetabular component. The circumference of the prosthesis is clearly depicted with computed tomography (CT) images that have been optimised to reduce metal artefacts. This case report highlights...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nagoya University
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6433632/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30962665 http://dx.doi.org/10.18999/nagjms.81.1.159 |
_version_ | 1783406310702710784 |
---|---|
author | Asai, Shuji Sobue, Yasumori Asai, Nobuyuki Takahashi, Nobunori Watanabe, Tatsuo Matsumoto, Takuya Ishiguro, Naoki Kojima, Toshihisa |
author_facet | Asai, Shuji Sobue, Yasumori Asai, Nobuyuki Takahashi, Nobunori Watanabe, Tatsuo Matsumoto, Takuya Ishiguro, Naoki Kojima, Toshihisa |
author_sort | Asai, Shuji |
collection | PubMed |
description | The periacetabular gap is an inherent consequence of the peripheral rim press-fit of the porous tantalum acetabular component. The circumference of the prosthesis is clearly depicted with computed tomography (CT) images that have been optimised to reduce metal artefacts. This case report highlights the utility of single-energy metal artefact reduction (SEMAR) for CT evaluation of the periacetabular gap by comparing CT images with and without SEMAR. A 70-year-old woman with a 5-year history of rheumatoid arthritis underwent total hip arthroplasty with a porous tantalum modular acetabular component. A periacetabular gap was suspected by plain radiography 2 weeks postoperatively. The metal artefacts rendered evaluation of the circumference of the acetabular component difficult in CT images acquired without SEMAR. In contrast, there were fewer metal artefacts, and a periacetabular gap (depth of 6.5 mm in DeLee and Charnley zone 2) was clearly depicted in CT images with SEMAR 2 weeks postoperatively. The porous surface of the acetabular component was in contact with the anterior and posterior rims of the acetabulum. Gap filling with bone and bone ingrowth into the porous surface were observed on CT images with SEMAR 24 weeks postoperatively. In conclusion, SEMAR reduces metal artefacts and improves CT image quality around the circumference of the acetabular component. The periacetabular gap and its filling with bone are clearly depicted in CT images with SEMAR, but not without SEMAR. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6433632 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Nagoya University |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64336322019-04-08 Computed tomography evaluation of the periacetabular gap of a porous tantalum acetabular component Asai, Shuji Sobue, Yasumori Asai, Nobuyuki Takahashi, Nobunori Watanabe, Tatsuo Matsumoto, Takuya Ishiguro, Naoki Kojima, Toshihisa Nagoya J Med Sci Case Report The periacetabular gap is an inherent consequence of the peripheral rim press-fit of the porous tantalum acetabular component. The circumference of the prosthesis is clearly depicted with computed tomography (CT) images that have been optimised to reduce metal artefacts. This case report highlights the utility of single-energy metal artefact reduction (SEMAR) for CT evaluation of the periacetabular gap by comparing CT images with and without SEMAR. A 70-year-old woman with a 5-year history of rheumatoid arthritis underwent total hip arthroplasty with a porous tantalum modular acetabular component. A periacetabular gap was suspected by plain radiography 2 weeks postoperatively. The metal artefacts rendered evaluation of the circumference of the acetabular component difficult in CT images acquired without SEMAR. In contrast, there were fewer metal artefacts, and a periacetabular gap (depth of 6.5 mm in DeLee and Charnley zone 2) was clearly depicted in CT images with SEMAR 2 weeks postoperatively. The porous surface of the acetabular component was in contact with the anterior and posterior rims of the acetabulum. Gap filling with bone and bone ingrowth into the porous surface were observed on CT images with SEMAR 24 weeks postoperatively. In conclusion, SEMAR reduces metal artefacts and improves CT image quality around the circumference of the acetabular component. The periacetabular gap and its filling with bone are clearly depicted in CT images with SEMAR, but not without SEMAR. Nagoya University 2019-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6433632/ /pubmed/30962665 http://dx.doi.org/10.18999/nagjms.81.1.159 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view the details of this license, please visit (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Case Report Asai, Shuji Sobue, Yasumori Asai, Nobuyuki Takahashi, Nobunori Watanabe, Tatsuo Matsumoto, Takuya Ishiguro, Naoki Kojima, Toshihisa Computed tomography evaluation of the periacetabular gap of a porous tantalum acetabular component |
title | Computed tomography evaluation of the periacetabular gap of a porous tantalum acetabular component |
title_full | Computed tomography evaluation of the periacetabular gap of a porous tantalum acetabular component |
title_fullStr | Computed tomography evaluation of the periacetabular gap of a porous tantalum acetabular component |
title_full_unstemmed | Computed tomography evaluation of the periacetabular gap of a porous tantalum acetabular component |
title_short | Computed tomography evaluation of the periacetabular gap of a porous tantalum acetabular component |
title_sort | computed tomography evaluation of the periacetabular gap of a porous tantalum acetabular component |
topic | Case Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6433632/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30962665 http://dx.doi.org/10.18999/nagjms.81.1.159 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT asaishuji computedtomographyevaluationoftheperiacetabulargapofaporoustantalumacetabularcomponent AT sobueyasumori computedtomographyevaluationoftheperiacetabulargapofaporoustantalumacetabularcomponent AT asainobuyuki computedtomographyevaluationoftheperiacetabulargapofaporoustantalumacetabularcomponent AT takahashinobunori computedtomographyevaluationoftheperiacetabulargapofaporoustantalumacetabularcomponent AT watanabetatsuo computedtomographyevaluationoftheperiacetabulargapofaporoustantalumacetabularcomponent AT matsumototakuya computedtomographyevaluationoftheperiacetabulargapofaporoustantalumacetabularcomponent AT ishiguronaoki computedtomographyevaluationoftheperiacetabulargapofaporoustantalumacetabularcomponent AT kojimatoshihisa computedtomographyevaluationoftheperiacetabulargapofaporoustantalumacetabularcomponent |