Cargando…

Computed tomography evaluation of the periacetabular gap of a porous tantalum acetabular component

The periacetabular gap is an inherent consequence of the peripheral rim press-fit of the porous tantalum acetabular component. The circumference of the prosthesis is clearly depicted with computed tomography (CT) images that have been optimised to reduce metal artefacts. This case report highlights...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Asai, Shuji, Sobue, Yasumori, Asai, Nobuyuki, Takahashi, Nobunori, Watanabe, Tatsuo, Matsumoto, Takuya, Ishiguro, Naoki, Kojima, Toshihisa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nagoya University 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6433632/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30962665
http://dx.doi.org/10.18999/nagjms.81.1.159
_version_ 1783406310702710784
author Asai, Shuji
Sobue, Yasumori
Asai, Nobuyuki
Takahashi, Nobunori
Watanabe, Tatsuo
Matsumoto, Takuya
Ishiguro, Naoki
Kojima, Toshihisa
author_facet Asai, Shuji
Sobue, Yasumori
Asai, Nobuyuki
Takahashi, Nobunori
Watanabe, Tatsuo
Matsumoto, Takuya
Ishiguro, Naoki
Kojima, Toshihisa
author_sort Asai, Shuji
collection PubMed
description The periacetabular gap is an inherent consequence of the peripheral rim press-fit of the porous tantalum acetabular component. The circumference of the prosthesis is clearly depicted with computed tomography (CT) images that have been optimised to reduce metal artefacts. This case report highlights the utility of single-energy metal artefact reduction (SEMAR) for CT evaluation of the periacetabular gap by comparing CT images with and without SEMAR. A 70-year-old woman with a 5-year history of rheumatoid arthritis underwent total hip arthroplasty with a porous tantalum modular acetabular component. A periacetabular gap was suspected by plain radiography 2 weeks postoperatively. The metal artefacts rendered evaluation of the circumference of the acetabular component difficult in CT images acquired without SEMAR. In contrast, there were fewer metal artefacts, and a periacetabular gap (depth of 6.5 mm in DeLee and Charnley zone 2) was clearly depicted in CT images with SEMAR 2 weeks postoperatively. The porous surface of the acetabular component was in contact with the anterior and posterior rims of the acetabulum. Gap filling with bone and bone ingrowth into the porous surface were observed on CT images with SEMAR 24 weeks postoperatively. In conclusion, SEMAR reduces metal artefacts and improves CT image quality around the circumference of the acetabular component. The periacetabular gap and its filling with bone are clearly depicted in CT images with SEMAR, but not without SEMAR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6433632
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Nagoya University
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64336322019-04-08 Computed tomography evaluation of the periacetabular gap of a porous tantalum acetabular component Asai, Shuji Sobue, Yasumori Asai, Nobuyuki Takahashi, Nobunori Watanabe, Tatsuo Matsumoto, Takuya Ishiguro, Naoki Kojima, Toshihisa Nagoya J Med Sci Case Report The periacetabular gap is an inherent consequence of the peripheral rim press-fit of the porous tantalum acetabular component. The circumference of the prosthesis is clearly depicted with computed tomography (CT) images that have been optimised to reduce metal artefacts. This case report highlights the utility of single-energy metal artefact reduction (SEMAR) for CT evaluation of the periacetabular gap by comparing CT images with and without SEMAR. A 70-year-old woman with a 5-year history of rheumatoid arthritis underwent total hip arthroplasty with a porous tantalum modular acetabular component. A periacetabular gap was suspected by plain radiography 2 weeks postoperatively. The metal artefacts rendered evaluation of the circumference of the acetabular component difficult in CT images acquired without SEMAR. In contrast, there were fewer metal artefacts, and a periacetabular gap (depth of 6.5 mm in DeLee and Charnley zone 2) was clearly depicted in CT images with SEMAR 2 weeks postoperatively. The porous surface of the acetabular component was in contact with the anterior and posterior rims of the acetabulum. Gap filling with bone and bone ingrowth into the porous surface were observed on CT images with SEMAR 24 weeks postoperatively. In conclusion, SEMAR reduces metal artefacts and improves CT image quality around the circumference of the acetabular component. The periacetabular gap and its filling with bone are clearly depicted in CT images with SEMAR, but not without SEMAR. Nagoya University 2019-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6433632/ /pubmed/30962665 http://dx.doi.org/10.18999/nagjms.81.1.159 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view the details of this license, please visit (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Case Report
Asai, Shuji
Sobue, Yasumori
Asai, Nobuyuki
Takahashi, Nobunori
Watanabe, Tatsuo
Matsumoto, Takuya
Ishiguro, Naoki
Kojima, Toshihisa
Computed tomography evaluation of the periacetabular gap of a porous tantalum acetabular component
title Computed tomography evaluation of the periacetabular gap of a porous tantalum acetabular component
title_full Computed tomography evaluation of the periacetabular gap of a porous tantalum acetabular component
title_fullStr Computed tomography evaluation of the periacetabular gap of a porous tantalum acetabular component
title_full_unstemmed Computed tomography evaluation of the periacetabular gap of a porous tantalum acetabular component
title_short Computed tomography evaluation of the periacetabular gap of a porous tantalum acetabular component
title_sort computed tomography evaluation of the periacetabular gap of a porous tantalum acetabular component
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6433632/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30962665
http://dx.doi.org/10.18999/nagjms.81.1.159
work_keys_str_mv AT asaishuji computedtomographyevaluationoftheperiacetabulargapofaporoustantalumacetabularcomponent
AT sobueyasumori computedtomographyevaluationoftheperiacetabulargapofaporoustantalumacetabularcomponent
AT asainobuyuki computedtomographyevaluationoftheperiacetabulargapofaporoustantalumacetabularcomponent
AT takahashinobunori computedtomographyevaluationoftheperiacetabulargapofaporoustantalumacetabularcomponent
AT watanabetatsuo computedtomographyevaluationoftheperiacetabulargapofaporoustantalumacetabularcomponent
AT matsumototakuya computedtomographyevaluationoftheperiacetabulargapofaporoustantalumacetabularcomponent
AT ishiguronaoki computedtomographyevaluationoftheperiacetabulargapofaporoustantalumacetabularcomponent
AT kojimatoshihisa computedtomographyevaluationoftheperiacetabulargapofaporoustantalumacetabularcomponent