Cargando…
Identification of a Consolidation Phase in Immunological Memory
Long lasting antibody responses and immunological memory are the desired outcomes of vaccination. In general, multiple vaccine doses result in enhanced immune responses, a notable exception being booster-induced hyporesponsiveness, which has been observed with polysaccharide and glycoconjugate vacci...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6433959/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30941140 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.00508 |
_version_ | 1783406381783580672 |
---|---|
author | Mantile, Francesca Capasso, Angelo De Berardinis, Piergiuseppe Prisco, Antonella |
author_facet | Mantile, Francesca Capasso, Angelo De Berardinis, Piergiuseppe Prisco, Antonella |
author_sort | Mantile, Francesca |
collection | PubMed |
description | Long lasting antibody responses and immunological memory are the desired outcomes of vaccination. In general, multiple vaccine doses result in enhanced immune responses, a notable exception being booster-induced hyporesponsiveness, which has been observed with polysaccharide and glycoconjugate vaccines. In this study, we analyzed the effect of early booster doses of multimeric protein vaccine (1-11)E2 on recall memory to B epitope 1-11 of β-amyloid. Mice immunized with a single dose of (1-11)E2 stochastically display, when immunized with a recall dose 9 months later, either memory, i.e., an enhanced response to epitope 1-11, or hyporesponsiveness, i.e., a reduced response. Memory is the most common outcome, achieved by 80% of mice. We observed that a booster dose of vaccine (1-11)E2 at day 15 significantly reduced the ratio between the magnitude of the secondary and primary response, causing an increase of hyporesponsive mice. This booster-dependent disruption of recall memory only occurred in a limited time window: a booster dose at day 21 had no significant effect on the ratio between the secondary and primary response magnitude. Thus, this study identifies a consolidation phase in immunological memory, that is a time window during which the formation of memory is vulnerable, and a disrupting stimulus reduces the probability that memory is achieved. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6433959 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64339592019-04-02 Identification of a Consolidation Phase in Immunological Memory Mantile, Francesca Capasso, Angelo De Berardinis, Piergiuseppe Prisco, Antonella Front Immunol Immunology Long lasting antibody responses and immunological memory are the desired outcomes of vaccination. In general, multiple vaccine doses result in enhanced immune responses, a notable exception being booster-induced hyporesponsiveness, which has been observed with polysaccharide and glycoconjugate vaccines. In this study, we analyzed the effect of early booster doses of multimeric protein vaccine (1-11)E2 on recall memory to B epitope 1-11 of β-amyloid. Mice immunized with a single dose of (1-11)E2 stochastically display, when immunized with a recall dose 9 months later, either memory, i.e., an enhanced response to epitope 1-11, or hyporesponsiveness, i.e., a reduced response. Memory is the most common outcome, achieved by 80% of mice. We observed that a booster dose of vaccine (1-11)E2 at day 15 significantly reduced the ratio between the magnitude of the secondary and primary response, causing an increase of hyporesponsive mice. This booster-dependent disruption of recall memory only occurred in a limited time window: a booster dose at day 21 had no significant effect on the ratio between the secondary and primary response magnitude. Thus, this study identifies a consolidation phase in immunological memory, that is a time window during which the formation of memory is vulnerable, and a disrupting stimulus reduces the probability that memory is achieved. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6433959/ /pubmed/30941140 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.00508 Text en Copyright © 2019 Mantile, Capasso, De Berardinis and Prisco. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Immunology Mantile, Francesca Capasso, Angelo De Berardinis, Piergiuseppe Prisco, Antonella Identification of a Consolidation Phase in Immunological Memory |
title | Identification of a Consolidation Phase in Immunological Memory |
title_full | Identification of a Consolidation Phase in Immunological Memory |
title_fullStr | Identification of a Consolidation Phase in Immunological Memory |
title_full_unstemmed | Identification of a Consolidation Phase in Immunological Memory |
title_short | Identification of a Consolidation Phase in Immunological Memory |
title_sort | identification of a consolidation phase in immunological memory |
topic | Immunology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6433959/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30941140 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.00508 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mantilefrancesca identificationofaconsolidationphaseinimmunologicalmemory AT capassoangelo identificationofaconsolidationphaseinimmunologicalmemory AT deberardinispiergiuseppe identificationofaconsolidationphaseinimmunologicalmemory AT priscoantonella identificationofaconsolidationphaseinimmunologicalmemory |