Cargando…

Usefulness of Abdominal Duplex Ultrasound for Detecting Endoleaks after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

Objective: The usefulness of abdominal duplex ultrasound (DUS) for the detection of endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) was evaluated. Materials and Methods: Among 286 patients who underwent EVAR between September 2007 and July 2017, 241 patients were followed up using abdominal DUS....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Uemura, Hisashi, Tanaka, Hiroe, Mitsuno, Masataka, Yamamura, Mitsuhiro, Ryomoto, Masaaki, Sekiya, Naosumi, Sato, Ayaka, Ueda, Daisuke, Miyamoto, Yuji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Japanese College of Angiology / The Japanese Society for Vascular Surgery / Japanese Society of Phlebology 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6434359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30931054
http://dx.doi.org/10.3400/avd.oa.18-00108
_version_ 1783406465975844864
author Uemura, Hisashi
Tanaka, Hiroe
Mitsuno, Masataka
Yamamura, Mitsuhiro
Ryomoto, Masaaki
Sekiya, Naosumi
Sato, Ayaka
Ueda, Daisuke
Miyamoto, Yuji
author_facet Uemura, Hisashi
Tanaka, Hiroe
Mitsuno, Masataka
Yamamura, Mitsuhiro
Ryomoto, Masaaki
Sekiya, Naosumi
Sato, Ayaka
Ueda, Daisuke
Miyamoto, Yuji
author_sort Uemura, Hisashi
collection PubMed
description Objective: The usefulness of abdominal duplex ultrasound (DUS) for the detection of endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) was evaluated. Materials and Methods: Among 286 patients who underwent EVAR between September 2007 and July 2017, 241 patients were followed up using abdominal DUS. Endoleaks were detected in 74 patients (31%), who were divided into enlarged and nonenlarged sac groups. Endoleak velocities and widths were measured using abdominal DUS every 6 months after EVAR and were compared between the 2 groups. Results: The aneurysm diameter in the nonenlarged sac group was 54.4±8.7 mm in the final follow-up. None of the patients in the nonenlarged sac group were subjected to reintervention, whereas all patients in the enlarged sac group were subjected to reintervention. The aneurysm diameter in the enlarged sac group was 62.8±8.8 mm at the time of reintervention, and the maximum endoleak flow velocities and endoleak widths were significantly higher in the enlarged sac group than in the nonenlarged sac group (p<0.05). The cutoff values on receiver operating characteristics curves for endoleak velocity and width were 83.4 cm/s and 4.0 mm, respectively. Conclusion: Follow-ups using abdominal DUS are useful after EVAR. Endoleak velocity and width measurements are important, and reintervention may be needed when these measurements exceed their cutoff values.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6434359
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Japanese College of Angiology / The Japanese Society for Vascular Surgery / Japanese Society of Phlebology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64343592019-03-29 Usefulness of Abdominal Duplex Ultrasound for Detecting Endoleaks after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair Uemura, Hisashi Tanaka, Hiroe Mitsuno, Masataka Yamamura, Mitsuhiro Ryomoto, Masaaki Sekiya, Naosumi Sato, Ayaka Ueda, Daisuke Miyamoto, Yuji Ann Vasc Dis Original Article Objective: The usefulness of abdominal duplex ultrasound (DUS) for the detection of endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) was evaluated. Materials and Methods: Among 286 patients who underwent EVAR between September 2007 and July 2017, 241 patients were followed up using abdominal DUS. Endoleaks were detected in 74 patients (31%), who were divided into enlarged and nonenlarged sac groups. Endoleak velocities and widths were measured using abdominal DUS every 6 months after EVAR and were compared between the 2 groups. Results: The aneurysm diameter in the nonenlarged sac group was 54.4±8.7 mm in the final follow-up. None of the patients in the nonenlarged sac group were subjected to reintervention, whereas all patients in the enlarged sac group were subjected to reintervention. The aneurysm diameter in the enlarged sac group was 62.8±8.8 mm at the time of reintervention, and the maximum endoleak flow velocities and endoleak widths were significantly higher in the enlarged sac group than in the nonenlarged sac group (p<0.05). The cutoff values on receiver operating characteristics curves for endoleak velocity and width were 83.4 cm/s and 4.0 mm, respectively. Conclusion: Follow-ups using abdominal DUS are useful after EVAR. Endoleak velocity and width measurements are important, and reintervention may be needed when these measurements exceed their cutoff values. Japanese College of Angiology / The Japanese Society for Vascular Surgery / Japanese Society of Phlebology 2019-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6434359/ /pubmed/30931054 http://dx.doi.org/10.3400/avd.oa.18-00108 Text en Copyright © 2019 Annals of Vascular Diseases http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ ©2019 The Editorial Committee of Annals of Vascular Diseases. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the credit of the original work, a link to the license, and indication of any change are properly given, and the original work is not used for commercial purposes. Remixed or transformed contributions must be distributed under the same license as the original.
spellingShingle Original Article
Uemura, Hisashi
Tanaka, Hiroe
Mitsuno, Masataka
Yamamura, Mitsuhiro
Ryomoto, Masaaki
Sekiya, Naosumi
Sato, Ayaka
Ueda, Daisuke
Miyamoto, Yuji
Usefulness of Abdominal Duplex Ultrasound for Detecting Endoleaks after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair
title Usefulness of Abdominal Duplex Ultrasound for Detecting Endoleaks after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair
title_full Usefulness of Abdominal Duplex Ultrasound for Detecting Endoleaks after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair
title_fullStr Usefulness of Abdominal Duplex Ultrasound for Detecting Endoleaks after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair
title_full_unstemmed Usefulness of Abdominal Duplex Ultrasound for Detecting Endoleaks after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair
title_short Usefulness of Abdominal Duplex Ultrasound for Detecting Endoleaks after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair
title_sort usefulness of abdominal duplex ultrasound for detecting endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6434359/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30931054
http://dx.doi.org/10.3400/avd.oa.18-00108
work_keys_str_mv AT uemurahisashi usefulnessofabdominalduplexultrasoundfordetectingendoleaksafterendovascularaneurysmrepair
AT tanakahiroe usefulnessofabdominalduplexultrasoundfordetectingendoleaksafterendovascularaneurysmrepair
AT mitsunomasataka usefulnessofabdominalduplexultrasoundfordetectingendoleaksafterendovascularaneurysmrepair
AT yamamuramitsuhiro usefulnessofabdominalduplexultrasoundfordetectingendoleaksafterendovascularaneurysmrepair
AT ryomotomasaaki usefulnessofabdominalduplexultrasoundfordetectingendoleaksafterendovascularaneurysmrepair
AT sekiyanaosumi usefulnessofabdominalduplexultrasoundfordetectingendoleaksafterendovascularaneurysmrepair
AT satoayaka usefulnessofabdominalduplexultrasoundfordetectingendoleaksafterendovascularaneurysmrepair
AT uedadaisuke usefulnessofabdominalduplexultrasoundfordetectingendoleaksafterendovascularaneurysmrepair
AT miyamotoyuji usefulnessofabdominalduplexultrasoundfordetectingendoleaksafterendovascularaneurysmrepair