Cargando…

Femoral Vein Transposition Arteriovenous Fistula is a Feasible Option in “Selected” Patients as Hemodialysis Access

Introduction: Lower extremity hemodialysis access is offered to the patients who have severe central venous stenosis. Femoral vein transposition arteriovenous fistula (FV tAVF) is an alternative to lower leg arteriovenous prosthetic grafts. Its safety and patency is under observation. Materials and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rehman, Zia Ur, Arham, Asfia, Sophie, Ziad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Japanese College of Angiology / The Japanese Society for Vascular Surgery / Japanese Society of Phlebology 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6434362/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30931053
http://dx.doi.org/10.3400/avd.oa.18-00118
_version_ 1783406466681536512
author Rehman, Zia Ur
Arham, Asfia
Sophie, Ziad
author_facet Rehman, Zia Ur
Arham, Asfia
Sophie, Ziad
author_sort Rehman, Zia Ur
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Lower extremity hemodialysis access is offered to the patients who have severe central venous stenosis. Femoral vein transposition arteriovenous fistula (FV tAVF) is an alternative to lower leg arteriovenous prosthetic grafts. Its safety and patency is under observation. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective review of patients who had FV tAVF between January 2011 and March 2016. Preoperative clinical findings, intraoperative findings, postoperative complications, and patency of the AVF were noted and analyzed. Results: There were 7 patients who underwent FV tAVF during this study period. Most patients were female (6 : 1), with mean age of 45.2 years (range, 33–55 years). All patients were hypertensive. Mean body mass index was 26.1 kg/m(2). Patient had on average previous 6 dialysis accesses. Most patients had preoperative venograms (6/7). Mean interval between initiation of dialysis and creation of the arteriovenous fistula was 1.08 years. All procedures were done under general anesthesia. Four patients required extension of FV with either the small segment of polytetrafluorethylene or vein graft. Two patients had early postoperative complications. One patient developed hematoma, whereas other had wound dehiscence. All the accesses were utilized for dialysis after a mean interval of 6 weeks. All patients had a patent fistula on average follow-up of 2 years. Conclusion: Appropriate patient selection for FV tAVF can provide good patency with low incidence of complications. This can be considered for good risk individuals undergoing their first lower extremity access.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6434362
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Japanese College of Angiology / The Japanese Society for Vascular Surgery / Japanese Society of Phlebology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64343622019-03-29 Femoral Vein Transposition Arteriovenous Fistula is a Feasible Option in “Selected” Patients as Hemodialysis Access Rehman, Zia Ur Arham, Asfia Sophie, Ziad Ann Vasc Dis Original Article Introduction: Lower extremity hemodialysis access is offered to the patients who have severe central venous stenosis. Femoral vein transposition arteriovenous fistula (FV tAVF) is an alternative to lower leg arteriovenous prosthetic grafts. Its safety and patency is under observation. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective review of patients who had FV tAVF between January 2011 and March 2016. Preoperative clinical findings, intraoperative findings, postoperative complications, and patency of the AVF were noted and analyzed. Results: There were 7 patients who underwent FV tAVF during this study period. Most patients were female (6 : 1), with mean age of 45.2 years (range, 33–55 years). All patients were hypertensive. Mean body mass index was 26.1 kg/m(2). Patient had on average previous 6 dialysis accesses. Most patients had preoperative venograms (6/7). Mean interval between initiation of dialysis and creation of the arteriovenous fistula was 1.08 years. All procedures were done under general anesthesia. Four patients required extension of FV with either the small segment of polytetrafluorethylene or vein graft. Two patients had early postoperative complications. One patient developed hematoma, whereas other had wound dehiscence. All the accesses were utilized for dialysis after a mean interval of 6 weeks. All patients had a patent fistula on average follow-up of 2 years. Conclusion: Appropriate patient selection for FV tAVF can provide good patency with low incidence of complications. This can be considered for good risk individuals undergoing their first lower extremity access. Japanese College of Angiology / The Japanese Society for Vascular Surgery / Japanese Society of Phlebology 2019-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6434362/ /pubmed/30931053 http://dx.doi.org/10.3400/avd.oa.18-00118 Text en Copyright © 2019 Annals of Vascular Diseases http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ ©2019 The Editorial Committee of Annals of Vascular Diseases. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the credit of the original work, a link to the license, and indication of any change are properly given, and the original work is not used for commercial purposes. Remixed or transformed contributions must be distributed under the same license as the original.
spellingShingle Original Article
Rehman, Zia Ur
Arham, Asfia
Sophie, Ziad
Femoral Vein Transposition Arteriovenous Fistula is a Feasible Option in “Selected” Patients as Hemodialysis Access
title Femoral Vein Transposition Arteriovenous Fistula is a Feasible Option in “Selected” Patients as Hemodialysis Access
title_full Femoral Vein Transposition Arteriovenous Fistula is a Feasible Option in “Selected” Patients as Hemodialysis Access
title_fullStr Femoral Vein Transposition Arteriovenous Fistula is a Feasible Option in “Selected” Patients as Hemodialysis Access
title_full_unstemmed Femoral Vein Transposition Arteriovenous Fistula is a Feasible Option in “Selected” Patients as Hemodialysis Access
title_short Femoral Vein Transposition Arteriovenous Fistula is a Feasible Option in “Selected” Patients as Hemodialysis Access
title_sort femoral vein transposition arteriovenous fistula is a feasible option in “selected” patients as hemodialysis access
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6434362/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30931053
http://dx.doi.org/10.3400/avd.oa.18-00118
work_keys_str_mv AT rehmanziaur femoralveintranspositionarteriovenousfistulaisafeasibleoptioninselectedpatientsashemodialysisaccess
AT arhamasfia femoralveintranspositionarteriovenousfistulaisafeasibleoptioninselectedpatientsashemodialysisaccess
AT sophieziad femoralveintranspositionarteriovenousfistulaisafeasibleoptioninselectedpatientsashemodialysisaccess