Cargando…

Watertight Robust Osteoconductive Barrier for Complex Skull Base Reconstruction: An Expanded-endoscopic Endonasal Experimental Study

Endoscopic skull base reconstruction (ESBR) following expanded-endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEA) in high-risk non-ideal endoscopic reconstructive candidates remains extremely challenging, and further innovations are still necessary. Here, the aim is to study the reconstructive knowledge gap foll...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: NAGM, Alhusain, OGIWARA, Toshihiro, HONGO, Kazuhiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Japan Neurosurgical Society 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6434420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30787233
http://dx.doi.org/10.2176/nmc.oa.2018-0262
_version_ 1783406474538516480
author NAGM, Alhusain
OGIWARA, Toshihiro
HONGO, Kazuhiro
author_facet NAGM, Alhusain
OGIWARA, Toshihiro
HONGO, Kazuhiro
author_sort NAGM, Alhusain
collection PubMed
description Endoscopic skull base reconstruction (ESBR) following expanded-endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEA) in high-risk non-ideal endoscopic reconstructive candidates remains extremely challenging, and further innovations are still necessary. Here, the aim is to study the reconstructive knowledge gap following expanded-EEA and to introduce the watertight robust osteoconductive (WRO)-barrier as an alternative durable option. Distinctively, we focused on 10 clinical circumstances. A 3D-skull base-water system model was innovated to investigate the ESBR under realistic conditions. A large-irregular defect (31 × 89 mm) extending from the crista galli to the mid-clivus was achieved. Then, WRO-barrier was fashioned and its tolerance was evaluated under stressful settings, including an exceedingly high (55 cmH(2)O) pressure, with radiological assessment. Next, the whole WRO-barrier was drilled to examine its practical-safe removal (simulating redo-EEA) and the whole experiment was repeated. Finally, WRO-barrier was kept into place to value its 18-month long-term high-tolerance. Results in all experiments of WRO-barriers were satisfactorily fashioned to conform the geometry of the created defect under realistic circumstances via EEA, tolerated an exceedingly high pressure without evidence of leak even under stressful settings, resisted sudden-elevated pressure, and remained in its position to maintain long-term watertight seal (18 months), efficiently evaluated with neuroimaging and simply removed-and-reconstructed when redo-EEA is needed. In conclusion, WRO-barrier as an osteoconductive watertight robust design for cranial base reconstruction possesses several distinct qualities that might be beneficial for patients with complex skull base tumours.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6434420
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher The Japan Neurosurgical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64344202019-03-27 Watertight Robust Osteoconductive Barrier for Complex Skull Base Reconstruction: An Expanded-endoscopic Endonasal Experimental Study NAGM, Alhusain OGIWARA, Toshihiro HONGO, Kazuhiro Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) Original Article Endoscopic skull base reconstruction (ESBR) following expanded-endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEA) in high-risk non-ideal endoscopic reconstructive candidates remains extremely challenging, and further innovations are still necessary. Here, the aim is to study the reconstructive knowledge gap following expanded-EEA and to introduce the watertight robust osteoconductive (WRO)-barrier as an alternative durable option. Distinctively, we focused on 10 clinical circumstances. A 3D-skull base-water system model was innovated to investigate the ESBR under realistic conditions. A large-irregular defect (31 × 89 mm) extending from the crista galli to the mid-clivus was achieved. Then, WRO-barrier was fashioned and its tolerance was evaluated under stressful settings, including an exceedingly high (55 cmH(2)O) pressure, with radiological assessment. Next, the whole WRO-barrier was drilled to examine its practical-safe removal (simulating redo-EEA) and the whole experiment was repeated. Finally, WRO-barrier was kept into place to value its 18-month long-term high-tolerance. Results in all experiments of WRO-barriers were satisfactorily fashioned to conform the geometry of the created defect under realistic circumstances via EEA, tolerated an exceedingly high pressure without evidence of leak even under stressful settings, resisted sudden-elevated pressure, and remained in its position to maintain long-term watertight seal (18 months), efficiently evaluated with neuroimaging and simply removed-and-reconstructed when redo-EEA is needed. In conclusion, WRO-barrier as an osteoconductive watertight robust design for cranial base reconstruction possesses several distinct qualities that might be beneficial for patients with complex skull base tumours. The Japan Neurosurgical Society 2019-03 2019-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6434420/ /pubmed/30787233 http://dx.doi.org/10.2176/nmc.oa.2018-0262 Text en © 2019 The Japan Neurosurgical Society This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spellingShingle Original Article
NAGM, Alhusain
OGIWARA, Toshihiro
HONGO, Kazuhiro
Watertight Robust Osteoconductive Barrier for Complex Skull Base Reconstruction: An Expanded-endoscopic Endonasal Experimental Study
title Watertight Robust Osteoconductive Barrier for Complex Skull Base Reconstruction: An Expanded-endoscopic Endonasal Experimental Study
title_full Watertight Robust Osteoconductive Barrier for Complex Skull Base Reconstruction: An Expanded-endoscopic Endonasal Experimental Study
title_fullStr Watertight Robust Osteoconductive Barrier for Complex Skull Base Reconstruction: An Expanded-endoscopic Endonasal Experimental Study
title_full_unstemmed Watertight Robust Osteoconductive Barrier for Complex Skull Base Reconstruction: An Expanded-endoscopic Endonasal Experimental Study
title_short Watertight Robust Osteoconductive Barrier for Complex Skull Base Reconstruction: An Expanded-endoscopic Endonasal Experimental Study
title_sort watertight robust osteoconductive barrier for complex skull base reconstruction: an expanded-endoscopic endonasal experimental study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6434420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30787233
http://dx.doi.org/10.2176/nmc.oa.2018-0262
work_keys_str_mv AT nagmalhusain watertightrobustosteoconductivebarrierforcomplexskullbasereconstructionanexpandedendoscopicendonasalexperimentalstudy
AT ogiwaratoshihiro watertightrobustosteoconductivebarrierforcomplexskullbasereconstructionanexpandedendoscopicendonasalexperimentalstudy
AT hongokazuhiro watertightrobustosteoconductivebarrierforcomplexskullbasereconstructionanexpandedendoscopicendonasalexperimentalstudy