Cargando…

The effects of different cold‐temperature regimes on development, growth, and susceptibility to an abiotic and biotic stressor

1. Global climate change is expected to both increase average temperatures as well as temperature variability. 2. Increased average temperatures have led to earlier breeding in many spring‐breeding organisms. However, individuals breeding earlier will also face increased temperature fluctuations, in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wersebe, Matthew, Blackwood, Paradyse, Guo, Ying Tong, Jaeger, Jared, May, Dyllan, Meindl, George, Ryan, Sean N., Wong, Vivian, Hua, Jessica
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6434568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30962897
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4957
_version_ 1783406499238772736
author Wersebe, Matthew
Blackwood, Paradyse
Guo, Ying Tong
Jaeger, Jared
May, Dyllan
Meindl, George
Ryan, Sean N.
Wong, Vivian
Hua, Jessica
author_facet Wersebe, Matthew
Blackwood, Paradyse
Guo, Ying Tong
Jaeger, Jared
May, Dyllan
Meindl, George
Ryan, Sean N.
Wong, Vivian
Hua, Jessica
author_sort Wersebe, Matthew
collection PubMed
description 1. Global climate change is expected to both increase average temperatures as well as temperature variability. 2. Increased average temperatures have led to earlier breeding in many spring‐breeding organisms. However, individuals breeding earlier will also face increased temperature fluctuations, including exposure to potentially harmful cold‐temperature regimes during early developmental stages. 3. Using a model spring‐breeding amphibian, we investigated how embryonic exposure to different cold‐temperature regimes (control, cold‐pulse, and cold‐press) affected (a) compensatory larval development and growth, (b) larval susceptibility to a common contaminant, and (c) larval susceptibility to parasites. 4. We found: (a) no evidence of compensatory development or growth, (b) larvae exposed to the cold‐press treatment were more susceptible to NaCl at 4‐days post‐hatching but recovered by 17‐days post‐hatching, and (c) larvae exposed to both cold treatments were less susceptible to parasites. 5. These results demonstrate that variation in cold‐temperature regimes can lead to unique direct and indirect effects on larval growth, development, and response to stressors. This underscores the importance of considering cold‐temperature variability and not just increased average temperatures when examining the impacts of climate disruption.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6434568
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64345682019-04-08 The effects of different cold‐temperature regimes on development, growth, and susceptibility to an abiotic and biotic stressor Wersebe, Matthew Blackwood, Paradyse Guo, Ying Tong Jaeger, Jared May, Dyllan Meindl, George Ryan, Sean N. Wong, Vivian Hua, Jessica Ecol Evol Original Research 1. Global climate change is expected to both increase average temperatures as well as temperature variability. 2. Increased average temperatures have led to earlier breeding in many spring‐breeding organisms. However, individuals breeding earlier will also face increased temperature fluctuations, including exposure to potentially harmful cold‐temperature regimes during early developmental stages. 3. Using a model spring‐breeding amphibian, we investigated how embryonic exposure to different cold‐temperature regimes (control, cold‐pulse, and cold‐press) affected (a) compensatory larval development and growth, (b) larval susceptibility to a common contaminant, and (c) larval susceptibility to parasites. 4. We found: (a) no evidence of compensatory development or growth, (b) larvae exposed to the cold‐press treatment were more susceptible to NaCl at 4‐days post‐hatching but recovered by 17‐days post‐hatching, and (c) larvae exposed to both cold treatments were less susceptible to parasites. 5. These results demonstrate that variation in cold‐temperature regimes can lead to unique direct and indirect effects on larval growth, development, and response to stressors. This underscores the importance of considering cold‐temperature variability and not just increased average temperatures when examining the impacts of climate disruption. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6434568/ /pubmed/30962897 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4957 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Wersebe, Matthew
Blackwood, Paradyse
Guo, Ying Tong
Jaeger, Jared
May, Dyllan
Meindl, George
Ryan, Sean N.
Wong, Vivian
Hua, Jessica
The effects of different cold‐temperature regimes on development, growth, and susceptibility to an abiotic and biotic stressor
title The effects of different cold‐temperature regimes on development, growth, and susceptibility to an abiotic and biotic stressor
title_full The effects of different cold‐temperature regimes on development, growth, and susceptibility to an abiotic and biotic stressor
title_fullStr The effects of different cold‐temperature regimes on development, growth, and susceptibility to an abiotic and biotic stressor
title_full_unstemmed The effects of different cold‐temperature regimes on development, growth, and susceptibility to an abiotic and biotic stressor
title_short The effects of different cold‐temperature regimes on development, growth, and susceptibility to an abiotic and biotic stressor
title_sort effects of different cold‐temperature regimes on development, growth, and susceptibility to an abiotic and biotic stressor
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6434568/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30962897
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4957
work_keys_str_mv AT wersebematthew theeffectsofdifferentcoldtemperatureregimesondevelopmentgrowthandsusceptibilitytoanabioticandbioticstressor
AT blackwoodparadyse theeffectsofdifferentcoldtemperatureregimesondevelopmentgrowthandsusceptibilitytoanabioticandbioticstressor
AT guoyingtong theeffectsofdifferentcoldtemperatureregimesondevelopmentgrowthandsusceptibilitytoanabioticandbioticstressor
AT jaegerjared theeffectsofdifferentcoldtemperatureregimesondevelopmentgrowthandsusceptibilitytoanabioticandbioticstressor
AT maydyllan theeffectsofdifferentcoldtemperatureregimesondevelopmentgrowthandsusceptibilitytoanabioticandbioticstressor
AT meindlgeorge theeffectsofdifferentcoldtemperatureregimesondevelopmentgrowthandsusceptibilitytoanabioticandbioticstressor
AT ryanseann theeffectsofdifferentcoldtemperatureregimesondevelopmentgrowthandsusceptibilitytoanabioticandbioticstressor
AT wongvivian theeffectsofdifferentcoldtemperatureregimesondevelopmentgrowthandsusceptibilitytoanabioticandbioticstressor
AT huajessica theeffectsofdifferentcoldtemperatureregimesondevelopmentgrowthandsusceptibilitytoanabioticandbioticstressor
AT wersebematthew effectsofdifferentcoldtemperatureregimesondevelopmentgrowthandsusceptibilitytoanabioticandbioticstressor
AT blackwoodparadyse effectsofdifferentcoldtemperatureregimesondevelopmentgrowthandsusceptibilitytoanabioticandbioticstressor
AT guoyingtong effectsofdifferentcoldtemperatureregimesondevelopmentgrowthandsusceptibilitytoanabioticandbioticstressor
AT jaegerjared effectsofdifferentcoldtemperatureregimesondevelopmentgrowthandsusceptibilitytoanabioticandbioticstressor
AT maydyllan effectsofdifferentcoldtemperatureregimesondevelopmentgrowthandsusceptibilitytoanabioticandbioticstressor
AT meindlgeorge effectsofdifferentcoldtemperatureregimesondevelopmentgrowthandsusceptibilitytoanabioticandbioticstressor
AT ryanseann effectsofdifferentcoldtemperatureregimesondevelopmentgrowthandsusceptibilitytoanabioticandbioticstressor
AT wongvivian effectsofdifferentcoldtemperatureregimesondevelopmentgrowthandsusceptibilitytoanabioticandbioticstressor
AT huajessica effectsofdifferentcoldtemperatureregimesondevelopmentgrowthandsusceptibilitytoanabioticandbioticstressor