Cargando…
Gender differences in peer review outcomes and manuscript impact at six journals of ecology and evolution
The productivity and performance of men is generally rated more highly than that of women in controlled experiments, suggesting conscious or unconscious gender biases in assessment. The degree to which editors and reviewers of scholarly journals exhibit gender biases that influence outcomes of the p...
Autores principales: | Fox, Charles W., Paine, C. E. Timothy |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6434606/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30962913 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4993 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Gender diversity of editorial boards and gender differences in the peer review process at six journals of ecology and evolution
por: Fox, Charles W., et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Citations increase with manuscript length, author number, and references cited in ecology journals
por: Fox, Charles W., et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Recruitment of reviewers is becoming harder at some journals: a test of the influence of reviewer fatigue at six journals in ecology and evolution
por: Fox, Charles W., et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Patterns of authorship in ecology and evolution: First, last, and corresponding authorship vary with gender and geography
por: Fox, Charles W., et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
An overview of innovations in the external peer review of journal manuscripts.
por: Woods, Helen Buckley, et al.
Publicado: (2023)