Cargando…

Treatment preferences of patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND: Multiple myeloma is a haematological malignancy characterized by significant morbidity and mortality. This study sought to develop an in-depth understanding of patients’ lived experiences of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) and its treatment, and to identify which features...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Parsons, Janet A., Greenspan, Nicole R., Baker, Natalie A., McKillop, Chris, Hicks, Lisa K., Chan, Olivia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6434792/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30909874
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5467-x
_version_ 1783406540743507968
author Parsons, Janet A.
Greenspan, Nicole R.
Baker, Natalie A.
McKillop, Chris
Hicks, Lisa K.
Chan, Olivia
author_facet Parsons, Janet A.
Greenspan, Nicole R.
Baker, Natalie A.
McKillop, Chris
Hicks, Lisa K.
Chan, Olivia
author_sort Parsons, Janet A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Multiple myeloma is a haematological malignancy characterized by significant morbidity and mortality. This study sought to develop an in-depth understanding of patients’ lived experiences of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) and its treatment, and to identify which features of treatment were most important to them. METHODS: Qualitative interviews and focus groups (FGs) were conducted with 32 people living with RRMM across Canada. In Phase 1, interviews focused on participants’ accounts of their experiences with the disease and its treatment and laid the groundwork for the FGs (Phase 2). The FGs developed a deeper understanding of patients’ treatment priorities. Interview and FG transcripts were coded for emergent themes and patterns. RESULTS: The interviews identified important side effects that had significant impacts on patients’ lives, including physical, cognitive, and psychological/emotional side effects. Participants also identified specific treatment features (attributes) that were important to them. These were compiled into a list and used in the FGs to understand patients’ priorities. Higher prioritized attributes were: life expectancy, physical and cognitive side effects, and financial impact. Mode of administration, treatment intervals, psychological side effects, and sleep/mood effects were identified as lower priorities. CONCLUSIONS: RRMM and its treatments impact importantly on patients’ quality-of-life across a range of domains. Patients prioritized treatment features that could enhance life expectancy, minimize side effects and offset financial burdens. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: A clear articulation of patient priorities can contribute to efforts to design treatment with patients’ concerns in mind, thereby promoting a more patient-centered approach to care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6434792
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64347922019-04-08 Treatment preferences of patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: a qualitative study Parsons, Janet A. Greenspan, Nicole R. Baker, Natalie A. McKillop, Chris Hicks, Lisa K. Chan, Olivia BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Multiple myeloma is a haematological malignancy characterized by significant morbidity and mortality. This study sought to develop an in-depth understanding of patients’ lived experiences of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) and its treatment, and to identify which features of treatment were most important to them. METHODS: Qualitative interviews and focus groups (FGs) were conducted with 32 people living with RRMM across Canada. In Phase 1, interviews focused on participants’ accounts of their experiences with the disease and its treatment and laid the groundwork for the FGs (Phase 2). The FGs developed a deeper understanding of patients’ treatment priorities. Interview and FG transcripts were coded for emergent themes and patterns. RESULTS: The interviews identified important side effects that had significant impacts on patients’ lives, including physical, cognitive, and psychological/emotional side effects. Participants also identified specific treatment features (attributes) that were important to them. These were compiled into a list and used in the FGs to understand patients’ priorities. Higher prioritized attributes were: life expectancy, physical and cognitive side effects, and financial impact. Mode of administration, treatment intervals, psychological side effects, and sleep/mood effects were identified as lower priorities. CONCLUSIONS: RRMM and its treatments impact importantly on patients’ quality-of-life across a range of domains. Patients prioritized treatment features that could enhance life expectancy, minimize side effects and offset financial burdens. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: A clear articulation of patient priorities can contribute to efforts to design treatment with patients’ concerns in mind, thereby promoting a more patient-centered approach to care. BioMed Central 2019-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6434792/ /pubmed/30909874 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5467-x Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Parsons, Janet A.
Greenspan, Nicole R.
Baker, Natalie A.
McKillop, Chris
Hicks, Lisa K.
Chan, Olivia
Treatment preferences of patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: a qualitative study
title Treatment preferences of patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: a qualitative study
title_full Treatment preferences of patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: a qualitative study
title_fullStr Treatment preferences of patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Treatment preferences of patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: a qualitative study
title_short Treatment preferences of patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: a qualitative study
title_sort treatment preferences of patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: a qualitative study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6434792/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30909874
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5467-x
work_keys_str_mv AT parsonsjaneta treatmentpreferencesofpatientswithrelapsedandrefractorymultiplemyelomaaqualitativestudy
AT greenspannicoler treatmentpreferencesofpatientswithrelapsedandrefractorymultiplemyelomaaqualitativestudy
AT bakernataliea treatmentpreferencesofpatientswithrelapsedandrefractorymultiplemyelomaaqualitativestudy
AT mckillopchris treatmentpreferencesofpatientswithrelapsedandrefractorymultiplemyelomaaqualitativestudy
AT hickslisak treatmentpreferencesofpatientswithrelapsedandrefractorymultiplemyelomaaqualitativestudy
AT chanolivia treatmentpreferencesofpatientswithrelapsedandrefractorymultiplemyelomaaqualitativestudy