Cargando…
Treatment preferences of patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: a qualitative study
BACKGROUND: Multiple myeloma is a haematological malignancy characterized by significant morbidity and mortality. This study sought to develop an in-depth understanding of patients’ lived experiences of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) and its treatment, and to identify which features...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6434792/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30909874 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5467-x |
_version_ | 1783406540743507968 |
---|---|
author | Parsons, Janet A. Greenspan, Nicole R. Baker, Natalie A. McKillop, Chris Hicks, Lisa K. Chan, Olivia |
author_facet | Parsons, Janet A. Greenspan, Nicole R. Baker, Natalie A. McKillop, Chris Hicks, Lisa K. Chan, Olivia |
author_sort | Parsons, Janet A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Multiple myeloma is a haematological malignancy characterized by significant morbidity and mortality. This study sought to develop an in-depth understanding of patients’ lived experiences of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) and its treatment, and to identify which features of treatment were most important to them. METHODS: Qualitative interviews and focus groups (FGs) were conducted with 32 people living with RRMM across Canada. In Phase 1, interviews focused on participants’ accounts of their experiences with the disease and its treatment and laid the groundwork for the FGs (Phase 2). The FGs developed a deeper understanding of patients’ treatment priorities. Interview and FG transcripts were coded for emergent themes and patterns. RESULTS: The interviews identified important side effects that had significant impacts on patients’ lives, including physical, cognitive, and psychological/emotional side effects. Participants also identified specific treatment features (attributes) that were important to them. These were compiled into a list and used in the FGs to understand patients’ priorities. Higher prioritized attributes were: life expectancy, physical and cognitive side effects, and financial impact. Mode of administration, treatment intervals, psychological side effects, and sleep/mood effects were identified as lower priorities. CONCLUSIONS: RRMM and its treatments impact importantly on patients’ quality-of-life across a range of domains. Patients prioritized treatment features that could enhance life expectancy, minimize side effects and offset financial burdens. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: A clear articulation of patient priorities can contribute to efforts to design treatment with patients’ concerns in mind, thereby promoting a more patient-centered approach to care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6434792 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64347922019-04-08 Treatment preferences of patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: a qualitative study Parsons, Janet A. Greenspan, Nicole R. Baker, Natalie A. McKillop, Chris Hicks, Lisa K. Chan, Olivia BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Multiple myeloma is a haematological malignancy characterized by significant morbidity and mortality. This study sought to develop an in-depth understanding of patients’ lived experiences of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) and its treatment, and to identify which features of treatment were most important to them. METHODS: Qualitative interviews and focus groups (FGs) were conducted with 32 people living with RRMM across Canada. In Phase 1, interviews focused on participants’ accounts of their experiences with the disease and its treatment and laid the groundwork for the FGs (Phase 2). The FGs developed a deeper understanding of patients’ treatment priorities. Interview and FG transcripts were coded for emergent themes and patterns. RESULTS: The interviews identified important side effects that had significant impacts on patients’ lives, including physical, cognitive, and psychological/emotional side effects. Participants also identified specific treatment features (attributes) that were important to them. These were compiled into a list and used in the FGs to understand patients’ priorities. Higher prioritized attributes were: life expectancy, physical and cognitive side effects, and financial impact. Mode of administration, treatment intervals, psychological side effects, and sleep/mood effects were identified as lower priorities. CONCLUSIONS: RRMM and its treatments impact importantly on patients’ quality-of-life across a range of domains. Patients prioritized treatment features that could enhance life expectancy, minimize side effects and offset financial burdens. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: A clear articulation of patient priorities can contribute to efforts to design treatment with patients’ concerns in mind, thereby promoting a more patient-centered approach to care. BioMed Central 2019-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6434792/ /pubmed/30909874 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5467-x Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Parsons, Janet A. Greenspan, Nicole R. Baker, Natalie A. McKillop, Chris Hicks, Lisa K. Chan, Olivia Treatment preferences of patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: a qualitative study |
title | Treatment preferences of patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: a qualitative study |
title_full | Treatment preferences of patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: a qualitative study |
title_fullStr | Treatment preferences of patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: a qualitative study |
title_full_unstemmed | Treatment preferences of patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: a qualitative study |
title_short | Treatment preferences of patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: a qualitative study |
title_sort | treatment preferences of patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: a qualitative study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6434792/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30909874 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5467-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parsonsjaneta treatmentpreferencesofpatientswithrelapsedandrefractorymultiplemyelomaaqualitativestudy AT greenspannicoler treatmentpreferencesofpatientswithrelapsedandrefractorymultiplemyelomaaqualitativestudy AT bakernataliea treatmentpreferencesofpatientswithrelapsedandrefractorymultiplemyelomaaqualitativestudy AT mckillopchris treatmentpreferencesofpatientswithrelapsedandrefractorymultiplemyelomaaqualitativestudy AT hickslisak treatmentpreferencesofpatientswithrelapsedandrefractorymultiplemyelomaaqualitativestudy AT chanolivia treatmentpreferencesofpatientswithrelapsedandrefractorymultiplemyelomaaqualitativestudy |