Cargando…

Multiple Aneurysms AnaTomy CHallenge 2018 (MATCH): uncertainty quantification of geometric rupture risk parameters

BACKGROUND: Geometric parameters have been proposed for prediction of cerebral aneurysm rupture risk. Predicting the rupture risk for incidentally detected unruptured aneurysms could help clinicians in their treatment decision. However, assessment of geometric parameters depends on several factors,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goubergrits, Leonid, Hellmeier, Florian, Bruening, Jan, Spuler, Andreas, Hege, Hans-Christian, Voss, Samuel, Janiga, Gábor, Saalfeld, Sylvia, Beuing, Oliver, Berg, Philipp
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6434802/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30909934
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-019-0657-y
_version_ 1783406543088123904
author Goubergrits, Leonid
Hellmeier, Florian
Bruening, Jan
Spuler, Andreas
Hege, Hans-Christian
Voss, Samuel
Janiga, Gábor
Saalfeld, Sylvia
Beuing, Oliver
Berg, Philipp
author_facet Goubergrits, Leonid
Hellmeier, Florian
Bruening, Jan
Spuler, Andreas
Hege, Hans-Christian
Voss, Samuel
Janiga, Gábor
Saalfeld, Sylvia
Beuing, Oliver
Berg, Philipp
author_sort Goubergrits, Leonid
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Geometric parameters have been proposed for prediction of cerebral aneurysm rupture risk. Predicting the rupture risk for incidentally detected unruptured aneurysms could help clinicians in their treatment decision. However, assessment of geometric parameters depends on several factors, including the spatial resolution of the imaging modality used and the chosen reconstruction procedure. The aim of this study was to investigate the uncertainty of a variety of previously proposed geometric parameters for rupture risk assessment, caused by variability of reconstruction procedures. MATERIALS: 26 research groups provided segmentations and surface reconstructions of five cerebral aneurysms as part of the Multiple Aneurysms AnaTomy CHallenge (MATCH) 2018. 40 dimensional and non-dimensional geometric parameters, describing aneurysm size, neck size, and irregularity of aneurysm shape, were computed. The medians as well as the absolute and relative uncertainties of the parameters were calculated. Additionally, linear regression analysis was performed on the absolute uncertainties and the median parameter values. RESULTS: A large variability of relative uncertainties in the range between 3.9 and 179.8% was found. Linear regression analysis indicates that some parameters capture similar geometric aspects. The lowest uncertainties < 6% were found for the non-dimensional parameters isoperimetric ratio, convexity ratio, and ellipticity index. Uncertainty of 2D and 3D size parameters was significantly higher than uncertainty of 1D parameters. The most extreme uncertainties > 80% were found for some curvature parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Uncertainty analysis is essential on the road to clinical translation and use of rupture risk prediction models. Uncertainty quantification of geometric rupture risk parameters provided by this study may help support development of future rupture risk prediction models. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12938-019-0657-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6434802
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64348022019-04-08 Multiple Aneurysms AnaTomy CHallenge 2018 (MATCH): uncertainty quantification of geometric rupture risk parameters Goubergrits, Leonid Hellmeier, Florian Bruening, Jan Spuler, Andreas Hege, Hans-Christian Voss, Samuel Janiga, Gábor Saalfeld, Sylvia Beuing, Oliver Berg, Philipp Biomed Eng Online Research BACKGROUND: Geometric parameters have been proposed for prediction of cerebral aneurysm rupture risk. Predicting the rupture risk for incidentally detected unruptured aneurysms could help clinicians in their treatment decision. However, assessment of geometric parameters depends on several factors, including the spatial resolution of the imaging modality used and the chosen reconstruction procedure. The aim of this study was to investigate the uncertainty of a variety of previously proposed geometric parameters for rupture risk assessment, caused by variability of reconstruction procedures. MATERIALS: 26 research groups provided segmentations and surface reconstructions of five cerebral aneurysms as part of the Multiple Aneurysms AnaTomy CHallenge (MATCH) 2018. 40 dimensional and non-dimensional geometric parameters, describing aneurysm size, neck size, and irregularity of aneurysm shape, were computed. The medians as well as the absolute and relative uncertainties of the parameters were calculated. Additionally, linear regression analysis was performed on the absolute uncertainties and the median parameter values. RESULTS: A large variability of relative uncertainties in the range between 3.9 and 179.8% was found. Linear regression analysis indicates that some parameters capture similar geometric aspects. The lowest uncertainties < 6% were found for the non-dimensional parameters isoperimetric ratio, convexity ratio, and ellipticity index. Uncertainty of 2D and 3D size parameters was significantly higher than uncertainty of 1D parameters. The most extreme uncertainties > 80% were found for some curvature parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Uncertainty analysis is essential on the road to clinical translation and use of rupture risk prediction models. Uncertainty quantification of geometric rupture risk parameters provided by this study may help support development of future rupture risk prediction models. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12938-019-0657-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6434802/ /pubmed/30909934 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-019-0657-y Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Goubergrits, Leonid
Hellmeier, Florian
Bruening, Jan
Spuler, Andreas
Hege, Hans-Christian
Voss, Samuel
Janiga, Gábor
Saalfeld, Sylvia
Beuing, Oliver
Berg, Philipp
Multiple Aneurysms AnaTomy CHallenge 2018 (MATCH): uncertainty quantification of geometric rupture risk parameters
title Multiple Aneurysms AnaTomy CHallenge 2018 (MATCH): uncertainty quantification of geometric rupture risk parameters
title_full Multiple Aneurysms AnaTomy CHallenge 2018 (MATCH): uncertainty quantification of geometric rupture risk parameters
title_fullStr Multiple Aneurysms AnaTomy CHallenge 2018 (MATCH): uncertainty quantification of geometric rupture risk parameters
title_full_unstemmed Multiple Aneurysms AnaTomy CHallenge 2018 (MATCH): uncertainty quantification of geometric rupture risk parameters
title_short Multiple Aneurysms AnaTomy CHallenge 2018 (MATCH): uncertainty quantification of geometric rupture risk parameters
title_sort multiple aneurysms anatomy challenge 2018 (match): uncertainty quantification of geometric rupture risk parameters
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6434802/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30909934
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12938-019-0657-y
work_keys_str_mv AT goubergritsleonid multipleaneurysmsanatomychallenge2018matchuncertaintyquantificationofgeometricruptureriskparameters
AT hellmeierflorian multipleaneurysmsanatomychallenge2018matchuncertaintyquantificationofgeometricruptureriskparameters
AT brueningjan multipleaneurysmsanatomychallenge2018matchuncertaintyquantificationofgeometricruptureriskparameters
AT spulerandreas multipleaneurysmsanatomychallenge2018matchuncertaintyquantificationofgeometricruptureriskparameters
AT hegehanschristian multipleaneurysmsanatomychallenge2018matchuncertaintyquantificationofgeometricruptureriskparameters
AT vosssamuel multipleaneurysmsanatomychallenge2018matchuncertaintyquantificationofgeometricruptureriskparameters
AT janigagabor multipleaneurysmsanatomychallenge2018matchuncertaintyquantificationofgeometricruptureriskparameters
AT saalfeldsylvia multipleaneurysmsanatomychallenge2018matchuncertaintyquantificationofgeometricruptureriskparameters
AT beuingoliver multipleaneurysmsanatomychallenge2018matchuncertaintyquantificationofgeometricruptureriskparameters
AT bergphilipp multipleaneurysmsanatomychallenge2018matchuncertaintyquantificationofgeometricruptureriskparameters