Cargando…

Strategies to improve maternal vaccination acceptance

BACKGROUND: In England, influenza and pertussis vaccination has been recommended for all pregnant women since 2010 and 2012 respectively. However, in some areas, vaccination uptake rates have been low. A qualitative study was conducted to gain a contextualised understanding of factors influencing va...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wilson, R., Paterson, P., Larson, H. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6434850/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30909907
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6655-y
_version_ 1783406554266992640
author Wilson, R.
Paterson, P.
Larson, H. J.
author_facet Wilson, R.
Paterson, P.
Larson, H. J.
author_sort Wilson, R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In England, influenza and pertussis vaccination has been recommended for all pregnant women since 2010 and 2012 respectively. However, in some areas, vaccination uptake rates have been low. A qualitative study was conducted to gain a contextualised understanding of factors influencing vaccination acceptance during pregnancy in Hackney, a borough in north-east London, UK. This paper draws on in-depth insights gained from the above study, to provide recommendations for increasing long-term maternal vaccination acceptance. METHODS: Hackney was chosen as the study site because it has one of the lowest vaccination coverage rates in pregnancy in the UK. A maximum variation sampling method was used to recruit 47 pregnant and recently pregnant women from a wide range of backgrounds, as well as ten healthcare professionals from three general practices; two community antenatal clinics; nine parent-toddler groups; and four community centres. In-depth interviews and a video-recording of a pregnant patient’s consultation, explored experiences of care within the National Health Service during pregnancy, and women’s views about maternal vaccination. In-depth interviews with healthcare professionals explored their views towards, and how they discuss and provide maternal vaccination. Study data were analysed both deductively, through drawing on insights from anthropological works that address diverse conceptualisations and practices around vaccination; and inductively, with a thematic analysis approach. RESULTS: The findings of this study and the recommendations based on them were divided into five broad themes: access to maternal vaccination; healthcare institution rhetoric and its effect on maternal vaccination acceptance; community and family influences on maternal vaccination decisions; healthcare professionals’ views towards maternal vaccination; and the influence of patient-healthcare professional relationships on maternal vaccination acceptance. CONCLUSIONS: The strategies to improve maternal vaccination acceptance recommended in this paper would engender a more open and democratised healthcare system. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-019-6655-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6434850
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64348502019-04-08 Strategies to improve maternal vaccination acceptance Wilson, R. Paterson, P. Larson, H. J. BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: In England, influenza and pertussis vaccination has been recommended for all pregnant women since 2010 and 2012 respectively. However, in some areas, vaccination uptake rates have been low. A qualitative study was conducted to gain a contextualised understanding of factors influencing vaccination acceptance during pregnancy in Hackney, a borough in north-east London, UK. This paper draws on in-depth insights gained from the above study, to provide recommendations for increasing long-term maternal vaccination acceptance. METHODS: Hackney was chosen as the study site because it has one of the lowest vaccination coverage rates in pregnancy in the UK. A maximum variation sampling method was used to recruit 47 pregnant and recently pregnant women from a wide range of backgrounds, as well as ten healthcare professionals from three general practices; two community antenatal clinics; nine parent-toddler groups; and four community centres. In-depth interviews and a video-recording of a pregnant patient’s consultation, explored experiences of care within the National Health Service during pregnancy, and women’s views about maternal vaccination. In-depth interviews with healthcare professionals explored their views towards, and how they discuss and provide maternal vaccination. Study data were analysed both deductively, through drawing on insights from anthropological works that address diverse conceptualisations and practices around vaccination; and inductively, with a thematic analysis approach. RESULTS: The findings of this study and the recommendations based on them were divided into five broad themes: access to maternal vaccination; healthcare institution rhetoric and its effect on maternal vaccination acceptance; community and family influences on maternal vaccination decisions; healthcare professionals’ views towards maternal vaccination; and the influence of patient-healthcare professional relationships on maternal vaccination acceptance. CONCLUSIONS: The strategies to improve maternal vaccination acceptance recommended in this paper would engender a more open and democratised healthcare system. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-019-6655-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6434850/ /pubmed/30909907 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6655-y Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wilson, R.
Paterson, P.
Larson, H. J.
Strategies to improve maternal vaccination acceptance
title Strategies to improve maternal vaccination acceptance
title_full Strategies to improve maternal vaccination acceptance
title_fullStr Strategies to improve maternal vaccination acceptance
title_full_unstemmed Strategies to improve maternal vaccination acceptance
title_short Strategies to improve maternal vaccination acceptance
title_sort strategies to improve maternal vaccination acceptance
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6434850/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30909907
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6655-y
work_keys_str_mv AT wilsonr strategiestoimprovematernalvaccinationacceptance
AT patersonp strategiestoimprovematernalvaccinationacceptance
AT larsonhj strategiestoimprovematernalvaccinationacceptance