Cargando…

Effect of anatomical change on dose distribution during radiotherapy for maxillary sinus carcinoma: passive scattering proton therapy versus volumetric-modulated arc therapy

OBJECTIVE: Maxillary sinus carcinomas are anatomically situated next to many organs at risk (OARs), and anatomical change is often observed during radiotherapy. We analyzed the effect of anatomical change on dose distribution of passive scattering proton therapy (PSPT) and volumetric-modulated arc t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Narita, Yuki, Kato, Takahiro, Ono, Takashi, Oyama, Sho, Komori, Shinya, Arai, Kazuhiro, Abe, Yoshitomo, Harada, Takaomi, Nakamura, Tatsuya, Wada, Hitoshi, Kikuchi, Yasuhiro, Murakami, Masao, Hosokawa, Yoichiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The British Institute of Radiology. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6435060/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30281327
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20180273
_version_ 1783406588292235264
author Narita, Yuki
Kato, Takahiro
Ono, Takashi
Oyama, Sho
Komori, Shinya
Arai, Kazuhiro
Abe, Yoshitomo
Harada, Takaomi
Nakamura, Tatsuya
Wada, Hitoshi
Kikuchi, Yasuhiro
Murakami, Masao
Hosokawa, Yoichiro
author_facet Narita, Yuki
Kato, Takahiro
Ono, Takashi
Oyama, Sho
Komori, Shinya
Arai, Kazuhiro
Abe, Yoshitomo
Harada, Takaomi
Nakamura, Tatsuya
Wada, Hitoshi
Kikuchi, Yasuhiro
Murakami, Masao
Hosokawa, Yoichiro
author_sort Narita, Yuki
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Maxillary sinus carcinomas are anatomically situated next to many organs at risk (OARs), and anatomical change is often observed during radiotherapy. We analyzed the effect of anatomical change on dose distribution of passive scattering proton therapy (PSPT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for 20 patients. METHODS: The first plans were generated based on the first CT images. The second CT images were acquired after 3 weeks, and the second plans were generated by copying the first plans to the second CT images. The effect of anatomical change was estimated by comparing both plans. RESULTS: Target volume change was observed in all cases, however, the influence on dose coverage of clinical target volume tended to be small. Alternatively, the doses to almost all OARs were increased. In particular, the increase in the dose to brainstem (p < 0.001) and optic chiasm (p < 0.001) was significantly higher in the second PSPT plan than in the first PSPT plan. Although PSPT is sensitive to anatomical change, the dose to OARs remained significantly lower in PSPT plans than that in VMAT plans. CONCLUSION: PSPT was confirmed to be more effective than VMAT even the effect of anatomical change was taken into account. Therefore, it is expected that the contralateral vision can be preserved reliably while optimal target coverage is provided. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: PSPT allowed significant sparing of OARs even in the result of the second plans affected by the anatomical change. PSPT offers benefits over VMAT in reducing dose to several OARs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6435060
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher The British Institute of Radiology.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64350602020-01-01 Effect of anatomical change on dose distribution during radiotherapy for maxillary sinus carcinoma: passive scattering proton therapy versus volumetric-modulated arc therapy Narita, Yuki Kato, Takahiro Ono, Takashi Oyama, Sho Komori, Shinya Arai, Kazuhiro Abe, Yoshitomo Harada, Takaomi Nakamura, Tatsuya Wada, Hitoshi Kikuchi, Yasuhiro Murakami, Masao Hosokawa, Yoichiro Br J Radiol Full Paper OBJECTIVE: Maxillary sinus carcinomas are anatomically situated next to many organs at risk (OARs), and anatomical change is often observed during radiotherapy. We analyzed the effect of anatomical change on dose distribution of passive scattering proton therapy (PSPT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for 20 patients. METHODS: The first plans were generated based on the first CT images. The second CT images were acquired after 3 weeks, and the second plans were generated by copying the first plans to the second CT images. The effect of anatomical change was estimated by comparing both plans. RESULTS: Target volume change was observed in all cases, however, the influence on dose coverage of clinical target volume tended to be small. Alternatively, the doses to almost all OARs were increased. In particular, the increase in the dose to brainstem (p < 0.001) and optic chiasm (p < 0.001) was significantly higher in the second PSPT plan than in the first PSPT plan. Although PSPT is sensitive to anatomical change, the dose to OARs remained significantly lower in PSPT plans than that in VMAT plans. CONCLUSION: PSPT was confirmed to be more effective than VMAT even the effect of anatomical change was taken into account. Therefore, it is expected that the contralateral vision can be preserved reliably while optimal target coverage is provided. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: PSPT allowed significant sparing of OARs even in the result of the second plans affected by the anatomical change. PSPT offers benefits over VMAT in reducing dose to several OARs. The British Institute of Radiology. 2019-01 2018-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6435060/ /pubmed/30281327 http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20180273 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Unported License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/, which permits unrestricted non-commercial reuse, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Full Paper
Narita, Yuki
Kato, Takahiro
Ono, Takashi
Oyama, Sho
Komori, Shinya
Arai, Kazuhiro
Abe, Yoshitomo
Harada, Takaomi
Nakamura, Tatsuya
Wada, Hitoshi
Kikuchi, Yasuhiro
Murakami, Masao
Hosokawa, Yoichiro
Effect of anatomical change on dose distribution during radiotherapy for maxillary sinus carcinoma: passive scattering proton therapy versus volumetric-modulated arc therapy
title Effect of anatomical change on dose distribution during radiotherapy for maxillary sinus carcinoma: passive scattering proton therapy versus volumetric-modulated arc therapy
title_full Effect of anatomical change on dose distribution during radiotherapy for maxillary sinus carcinoma: passive scattering proton therapy versus volumetric-modulated arc therapy
title_fullStr Effect of anatomical change on dose distribution during radiotherapy for maxillary sinus carcinoma: passive scattering proton therapy versus volumetric-modulated arc therapy
title_full_unstemmed Effect of anatomical change on dose distribution during radiotherapy for maxillary sinus carcinoma: passive scattering proton therapy versus volumetric-modulated arc therapy
title_short Effect of anatomical change on dose distribution during radiotherapy for maxillary sinus carcinoma: passive scattering proton therapy versus volumetric-modulated arc therapy
title_sort effect of anatomical change on dose distribution during radiotherapy for maxillary sinus carcinoma: passive scattering proton therapy versus volumetric-modulated arc therapy
topic Full Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6435060/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30281327
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20180273
work_keys_str_mv AT naritayuki effectofanatomicalchangeondosedistributionduringradiotherapyformaxillarysinuscarcinomapassivescatteringprotontherapyversusvolumetricmodulatedarctherapy
AT katotakahiro effectofanatomicalchangeondosedistributionduringradiotherapyformaxillarysinuscarcinomapassivescatteringprotontherapyversusvolumetricmodulatedarctherapy
AT onotakashi effectofanatomicalchangeondosedistributionduringradiotherapyformaxillarysinuscarcinomapassivescatteringprotontherapyversusvolumetricmodulatedarctherapy
AT oyamasho effectofanatomicalchangeondosedistributionduringradiotherapyformaxillarysinuscarcinomapassivescatteringprotontherapyversusvolumetricmodulatedarctherapy
AT komorishinya effectofanatomicalchangeondosedistributionduringradiotherapyformaxillarysinuscarcinomapassivescatteringprotontherapyversusvolumetricmodulatedarctherapy
AT araikazuhiro effectofanatomicalchangeondosedistributionduringradiotherapyformaxillarysinuscarcinomapassivescatteringprotontherapyversusvolumetricmodulatedarctherapy
AT abeyoshitomo effectofanatomicalchangeondosedistributionduringradiotherapyformaxillarysinuscarcinomapassivescatteringprotontherapyversusvolumetricmodulatedarctherapy
AT haradatakaomi effectofanatomicalchangeondosedistributionduringradiotherapyformaxillarysinuscarcinomapassivescatteringprotontherapyversusvolumetricmodulatedarctherapy
AT nakamuratatsuya effectofanatomicalchangeondosedistributionduringradiotherapyformaxillarysinuscarcinomapassivescatteringprotontherapyversusvolumetricmodulatedarctherapy
AT wadahitoshi effectofanatomicalchangeondosedistributionduringradiotherapyformaxillarysinuscarcinomapassivescatteringprotontherapyversusvolumetricmodulatedarctherapy
AT kikuchiyasuhiro effectofanatomicalchangeondosedistributionduringradiotherapyformaxillarysinuscarcinomapassivescatteringprotontherapyversusvolumetricmodulatedarctherapy
AT murakamimasao effectofanatomicalchangeondosedistributionduringradiotherapyformaxillarysinuscarcinomapassivescatteringprotontherapyversusvolumetricmodulatedarctherapy
AT hosokawayoichiro effectofanatomicalchangeondosedistributionduringradiotherapyformaxillarysinuscarcinomapassivescatteringprotontherapyversusvolumetricmodulatedarctherapy