Cargando…

Supporting evidence-informed policy and scrutiny: A consultation of UK research professionals

Access to reliable and timely information ensures that decision-makers can operate effectively. The motivations and challenges of parliamentarians and policy-makers in accessing evidence have been well documented in the policy literature. However, there has been little focus on research-providers. U...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Walker, Lindsay A., Lawrence, Natalia S., Chambers, Chris D., Wood, Marsha, Barnett, Julie, Durrant, Hannah, Pike, Lindsey, O’Grady, Gerard, Bestmann, Sven, Kythreotis, Andrew P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6435130/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30913236
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214136
_version_ 1783406596196401152
author Walker, Lindsay A.
Lawrence, Natalia S.
Chambers, Chris D.
Wood, Marsha
Barnett, Julie
Durrant, Hannah
Pike, Lindsey
O’Grady, Gerard
Bestmann, Sven
Kythreotis, Andrew P.
author_facet Walker, Lindsay A.
Lawrence, Natalia S.
Chambers, Chris D.
Wood, Marsha
Barnett, Julie
Durrant, Hannah
Pike, Lindsey
O’Grady, Gerard
Bestmann, Sven
Kythreotis, Andrew P.
author_sort Walker, Lindsay A.
collection PubMed
description Access to reliable and timely information ensures that decision-makers can operate effectively. The motivations and challenges of parliamentarians and policy-makers in accessing evidence have been well documented in the policy literature. However, there has been little focus on research-providers. Understanding both the demand- and the supply-side of research engagement is imperative to enhancing impactful interactions. Here, we examine the broader experiences, motivations and challenges of UK-based research professionals engaging with research-users relevant to policy-making and scrutiny in the UK using a nationwide online questionnaire. The context of the survey partly involved contributing to the UK Evidence Information Service (EIS), a proposed rapid match-making service to facilitate interaction between parliamentary arenas that use evidence and research-providers. Our findings reveal, at least for this sub-sample who responded, that there are gender-related differences in policy-related experience, motivations, incentives and challenges for research professionals to contribute to evidence-informed decision-making through initiatives such as the EIS. Male and female participants were equally likely to have policy experience; however, males reported both significantly broader engagement with the research-users included in the survey and significantly higher levels of engagement with each research-user. Reported incentives for engagement included understanding what the evidence will be used for, guidance on style and content of contribution, and acknowledgement of contributions by the policymaker or elected official. Female participants were significantly more likely to select the guidance-related options. The main reported barrier was workload. We discuss how academia-policy engagement initiatives can best address these issues in ways that enhance the integration of research evidence with policy and practice across the UK.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6435130
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64351302019-04-08 Supporting evidence-informed policy and scrutiny: A consultation of UK research professionals Walker, Lindsay A. Lawrence, Natalia S. Chambers, Chris D. Wood, Marsha Barnett, Julie Durrant, Hannah Pike, Lindsey O’Grady, Gerard Bestmann, Sven Kythreotis, Andrew P. PLoS One Research Article Access to reliable and timely information ensures that decision-makers can operate effectively. The motivations and challenges of parliamentarians and policy-makers in accessing evidence have been well documented in the policy literature. However, there has been little focus on research-providers. Understanding both the demand- and the supply-side of research engagement is imperative to enhancing impactful interactions. Here, we examine the broader experiences, motivations and challenges of UK-based research professionals engaging with research-users relevant to policy-making and scrutiny in the UK using a nationwide online questionnaire. The context of the survey partly involved contributing to the UK Evidence Information Service (EIS), a proposed rapid match-making service to facilitate interaction between parliamentary arenas that use evidence and research-providers. Our findings reveal, at least for this sub-sample who responded, that there are gender-related differences in policy-related experience, motivations, incentives and challenges for research professionals to contribute to evidence-informed decision-making through initiatives such as the EIS. Male and female participants were equally likely to have policy experience; however, males reported both significantly broader engagement with the research-users included in the survey and significantly higher levels of engagement with each research-user. Reported incentives for engagement included understanding what the evidence will be used for, guidance on style and content of contribution, and acknowledgement of contributions by the policymaker or elected official. Female participants were significantly more likely to select the guidance-related options. The main reported barrier was workload. We discuss how academia-policy engagement initiatives can best address these issues in ways that enhance the integration of research evidence with policy and practice across the UK. Public Library of Science 2019-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6435130/ /pubmed/30913236 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214136 Text en © 2019 Walker et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Walker, Lindsay A.
Lawrence, Natalia S.
Chambers, Chris D.
Wood, Marsha
Barnett, Julie
Durrant, Hannah
Pike, Lindsey
O’Grady, Gerard
Bestmann, Sven
Kythreotis, Andrew P.
Supporting evidence-informed policy and scrutiny: A consultation of UK research professionals
title Supporting evidence-informed policy and scrutiny: A consultation of UK research professionals
title_full Supporting evidence-informed policy and scrutiny: A consultation of UK research professionals
title_fullStr Supporting evidence-informed policy and scrutiny: A consultation of UK research professionals
title_full_unstemmed Supporting evidence-informed policy and scrutiny: A consultation of UK research professionals
title_short Supporting evidence-informed policy and scrutiny: A consultation of UK research professionals
title_sort supporting evidence-informed policy and scrutiny: a consultation of uk research professionals
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6435130/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30913236
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214136
work_keys_str_mv AT walkerlindsaya supportingevidenceinformedpolicyandscrutinyaconsultationofukresearchprofessionals
AT lawrencenatalias supportingevidenceinformedpolicyandscrutinyaconsultationofukresearchprofessionals
AT chamberschrisd supportingevidenceinformedpolicyandscrutinyaconsultationofukresearchprofessionals
AT woodmarsha supportingevidenceinformedpolicyandscrutinyaconsultationofukresearchprofessionals
AT barnettjulie supportingevidenceinformedpolicyandscrutinyaconsultationofukresearchprofessionals
AT durranthannah supportingevidenceinformedpolicyandscrutinyaconsultationofukresearchprofessionals
AT pikelindsey supportingevidenceinformedpolicyandscrutinyaconsultationofukresearchprofessionals
AT ogradygerard supportingevidenceinformedpolicyandscrutinyaconsultationofukresearchprofessionals
AT bestmannsven supportingevidenceinformedpolicyandscrutinyaconsultationofukresearchprofessionals
AT kythreotisandrewp supportingevidenceinformedpolicyandscrutinyaconsultationofukresearchprofessionals