Cargando…

Normal axillary thickness thresholds as a metric for nutritional status of children()

INTRODUCTION: Childhood pneumonia is a major cause of death in the 3rd world, and undernourishment increases the severity of the condition. We considered axillary thickness as a simple measurement to evaluate nutritional status that can be performed simultaneously with lung ultrasound. Our goal was...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wall Kleinhenz, Alissa L., Gao, Jing, Kovanlikaya, Arzu, Rosenbaum, Daniel, Guisado, Daniela I., Rubin, Jonathan M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6435252/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30551026
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2018.11.010
_version_ 1783406624075939840
author Wall Kleinhenz, Alissa L.
Gao, Jing
Kovanlikaya, Arzu
Rosenbaum, Daniel
Guisado, Daniela I.
Rubin, Jonathan M.
author_facet Wall Kleinhenz, Alissa L.
Gao, Jing
Kovanlikaya, Arzu
Rosenbaum, Daniel
Guisado, Daniela I.
Rubin, Jonathan M.
author_sort Wall Kleinhenz, Alissa L.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Childhood pneumonia is a major cause of death in the 3rd world, and undernourishment increases the severity of the condition. We considered axillary thickness as a simple measurement to evaluate nutritional status that can be performed simultaneously with lung ultrasound. Our goal was to determine the distribution of axillary thickness in a cohort of children to determine a threshold for malnutrition. METHODS: Clinical databases were scanned to identify chest computed tomograms (CT) in children between the ages of 0 and 5 years with non-debilitating disease. The bilateral axillary thicknesses of the cohort were determined using equivalent width, and these measurements were segmented by age, sex, and laterality to determine cutoff thresholds. Data was evaluated using single factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) and 5th percentile analysis to determine the lower bound thresholds of axillary thickness. RESULTS: 247 scans met inclusion criteria. ANOVA demonstrated no significant differences in the mean measurements in the 5 groups (p = 0.377). 95% confidence limits on the 5th percentile plots showed an axillary thickness of 1.5 cm was a reasonable threshold for malnutrition detection for all age groups and sexes except for males between 0 and 1 years old where a 1.1 cm threshold may be required. DISCUSSION: CT scans of the chests in a cohort of children without debilitating disease revealed a remarkably uniform axillary thickness threshold for malnutrition assessment of 1.5 cm. This suggests that there may be a threshold for nutritional assessment for children undergoing lung ultrasound scans for childhood pneumonia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6435252
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64352522019-04-08 Normal axillary thickness thresholds as a metric for nutritional status of children() Wall Kleinhenz, Alissa L. Gao, Jing Kovanlikaya, Arzu Rosenbaum, Daniel Guisado, Daniela I. Rubin, Jonathan M. Clin Imaging Article INTRODUCTION: Childhood pneumonia is a major cause of death in the 3rd world, and undernourishment increases the severity of the condition. We considered axillary thickness as a simple measurement to evaluate nutritional status that can be performed simultaneously with lung ultrasound. Our goal was to determine the distribution of axillary thickness in a cohort of children to determine a threshold for malnutrition. METHODS: Clinical databases were scanned to identify chest computed tomograms (CT) in children between the ages of 0 and 5 years with non-debilitating disease. The bilateral axillary thicknesses of the cohort were determined using equivalent width, and these measurements were segmented by age, sex, and laterality to determine cutoff thresholds. Data was evaluated using single factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) and 5th percentile analysis to determine the lower bound thresholds of axillary thickness. RESULTS: 247 scans met inclusion criteria. ANOVA demonstrated no significant differences in the mean measurements in the 5 groups (p = 0.377). 95% confidence limits on the 5th percentile plots showed an axillary thickness of 1.5 cm was a reasonable threshold for malnutrition detection for all age groups and sexes except for males between 0 and 1 years old where a 1.1 cm threshold may be required. DISCUSSION: CT scans of the chests in a cohort of children without debilitating disease revealed a remarkably uniform axillary thickness threshold for malnutrition assessment of 1.5 cm. This suggests that there may be a threshold for nutritional assessment for children undergoing lung ultrasound scans for childhood pneumonia. Elsevier 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6435252/ /pubmed/30551026 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2018.11.010 Text en © 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Wall Kleinhenz, Alissa L.
Gao, Jing
Kovanlikaya, Arzu
Rosenbaum, Daniel
Guisado, Daniela I.
Rubin, Jonathan M.
Normal axillary thickness thresholds as a metric for nutritional status of children()
title Normal axillary thickness thresholds as a metric for nutritional status of children()
title_full Normal axillary thickness thresholds as a metric for nutritional status of children()
title_fullStr Normal axillary thickness thresholds as a metric for nutritional status of children()
title_full_unstemmed Normal axillary thickness thresholds as a metric for nutritional status of children()
title_short Normal axillary thickness thresholds as a metric for nutritional status of children()
title_sort normal axillary thickness thresholds as a metric for nutritional status of children()
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6435252/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30551026
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2018.11.010
work_keys_str_mv AT wallkleinhenzalissal normalaxillarythicknessthresholdsasametricfornutritionalstatusofchildren
AT gaojing normalaxillarythicknessthresholdsasametricfornutritionalstatusofchildren
AT kovanlikayaarzu normalaxillarythicknessthresholdsasametricfornutritionalstatusofchildren
AT rosenbaumdaniel normalaxillarythicknessthresholdsasametricfornutritionalstatusofchildren
AT guisadodanielai normalaxillarythicknessthresholdsasametricfornutritionalstatusofchildren
AT rubinjonathanm normalaxillarythicknessthresholdsasametricfornutritionalstatusofchildren