Cargando…

Across-species differences in pitch perception are consistent with differences in cochlear filtering

Pitch perception is critical for recognizing speech, music and animal vocalizations, but its neurobiological basis remains unsettled, in part because of divergent results across species. We investigated whether species-specific differences exist in the cues used to perceive pitch and whether these c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Walker, Kerry MM, Gonzalez, Ray, Kang, Joe Z, McDermott, Josh H, King, Andrew J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6435318/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30874501
http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.41626
_version_ 1783406626967912448
author Walker, Kerry MM
Gonzalez, Ray
Kang, Joe Z
McDermott, Josh H
King, Andrew J
author_facet Walker, Kerry MM
Gonzalez, Ray
Kang, Joe Z
McDermott, Josh H
King, Andrew J
author_sort Walker, Kerry MM
collection PubMed
description Pitch perception is critical for recognizing speech, music and animal vocalizations, but its neurobiological basis remains unsettled, in part because of divergent results across species. We investigated whether species-specific differences exist in the cues used to perceive pitch and whether these can be accounted for by differences in the auditory periphery. Ferrets accurately generalized pitch discriminations to untrained stimuli whenever temporal envelope cues were robust in the probe sounds, but not when resolved harmonics were the main available cue. By contrast, human listeners exhibited the opposite pattern of results on an analogous task, consistent with previous studies. Simulated cochlear responses in the two species suggest that differences in the relative salience of the two pitch cues can be attributed to differences in cochlear filter bandwidths. The results support the view that cross-species variation in pitch perception reflects the constraints of estimating a sound’s fundamental frequency given species-specific cochlear tuning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6435318
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64353182019-03-27 Across-species differences in pitch perception are consistent with differences in cochlear filtering Walker, Kerry MM Gonzalez, Ray Kang, Joe Z McDermott, Josh H King, Andrew J eLife Neuroscience Pitch perception is critical for recognizing speech, music and animal vocalizations, but its neurobiological basis remains unsettled, in part because of divergent results across species. We investigated whether species-specific differences exist in the cues used to perceive pitch and whether these can be accounted for by differences in the auditory periphery. Ferrets accurately generalized pitch discriminations to untrained stimuli whenever temporal envelope cues were robust in the probe sounds, but not when resolved harmonics were the main available cue. By contrast, human listeners exhibited the opposite pattern of results on an analogous task, consistent with previous studies. Simulated cochlear responses in the two species suggest that differences in the relative salience of the two pitch cues can be attributed to differences in cochlear filter bandwidths. The results support the view that cross-species variation in pitch perception reflects the constraints of estimating a sound’s fundamental frequency given species-specific cochlear tuning. eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2019-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6435318/ /pubmed/30874501 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.41626 Text en © 2019, Walker et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Walker, Kerry MM
Gonzalez, Ray
Kang, Joe Z
McDermott, Josh H
King, Andrew J
Across-species differences in pitch perception are consistent with differences in cochlear filtering
title Across-species differences in pitch perception are consistent with differences in cochlear filtering
title_full Across-species differences in pitch perception are consistent with differences in cochlear filtering
title_fullStr Across-species differences in pitch perception are consistent with differences in cochlear filtering
title_full_unstemmed Across-species differences in pitch perception are consistent with differences in cochlear filtering
title_short Across-species differences in pitch perception are consistent with differences in cochlear filtering
title_sort across-species differences in pitch perception are consistent with differences in cochlear filtering
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6435318/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30874501
http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.41626
work_keys_str_mv AT walkerkerrymm acrossspeciesdifferencesinpitchperceptionareconsistentwithdifferencesincochlearfiltering
AT gonzalezray acrossspeciesdifferencesinpitchperceptionareconsistentwithdifferencesincochlearfiltering
AT kangjoez acrossspeciesdifferencesinpitchperceptionareconsistentwithdifferencesincochlearfiltering
AT mcdermottjoshh acrossspeciesdifferencesinpitchperceptionareconsistentwithdifferencesincochlearfiltering
AT kingandrewj acrossspeciesdifferencesinpitchperceptionareconsistentwithdifferencesincochlearfiltering