Cargando…
Across-species differences in pitch perception are consistent with differences in cochlear filtering
Pitch perception is critical for recognizing speech, music and animal vocalizations, but its neurobiological basis remains unsettled, in part because of divergent results across species. We investigated whether species-specific differences exist in the cues used to perceive pitch and whether these c...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6435318/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30874501 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.41626 |
_version_ | 1783406626967912448 |
---|---|
author | Walker, Kerry MM Gonzalez, Ray Kang, Joe Z McDermott, Josh H King, Andrew J |
author_facet | Walker, Kerry MM Gonzalez, Ray Kang, Joe Z McDermott, Josh H King, Andrew J |
author_sort | Walker, Kerry MM |
collection | PubMed |
description | Pitch perception is critical for recognizing speech, music and animal vocalizations, but its neurobiological basis remains unsettled, in part because of divergent results across species. We investigated whether species-specific differences exist in the cues used to perceive pitch and whether these can be accounted for by differences in the auditory periphery. Ferrets accurately generalized pitch discriminations to untrained stimuli whenever temporal envelope cues were robust in the probe sounds, but not when resolved harmonics were the main available cue. By contrast, human listeners exhibited the opposite pattern of results on an analogous task, consistent with previous studies. Simulated cochlear responses in the two species suggest that differences in the relative salience of the two pitch cues can be attributed to differences in cochlear filter bandwidths. The results support the view that cross-species variation in pitch perception reflects the constraints of estimating a sound’s fundamental frequency given species-specific cochlear tuning. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6435318 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64353182019-03-27 Across-species differences in pitch perception are consistent with differences in cochlear filtering Walker, Kerry MM Gonzalez, Ray Kang, Joe Z McDermott, Josh H King, Andrew J eLife Neuroscience Pitch perception is critical for recognizing speech, music and animal vocalizations, but its neurobiological basis remains unsettled, in part because of divergent results across species. We investigated whether species-specific differences exist in the cues used to perceive pitch and whether these can be accounted for by differences in the auditory periphery. Ferrets accurately generalized pitch discriminations to untrained stimuli whenever temporal envelope cues were robust in the probe sounds, but not when resolved harmonics were the main available cue. By contrast, human listeners exhibited the opposite pattern of results on an analogous task, consistent with previous studies. Simulated cochlear responses in the two species suggest that differences in the relative salience of the two pitch cues can be attributed to differences in cochlear filter bandwidths. The results support the view that cross-species variation in pitch perception reflects the constraints of estimating a sound’s fundamental frequency given species-specific cochlear tuning. eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2019-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6435318/ /pubmed/30874501 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.41626 Text en © 2019, Walker et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Walker, Kerry MM Gonzalez, Ray Kang, Joe Z McDermott, Josh H King, Andrew J Across-species differences in pitch perception are consistent with differences in cochlear filtering |
title | Across-species differences in pitch perception are consistent with differences in cochlear filtering |
title_full | Across-species differences in pitch perception are consistent with differences in cochlear filtering |
title_fullStr | Across-species differences in pitch perception are consistent with differences in cochlear filtering |
title_full_unstemmed | Across-species differences in pitch perception are consistent with differences in cochlear filtering |
title_short | Across-species differences in pitch perception are consistent with differences in cochlear filtering |
title_sort | across-species differences in pitch perception are consistent with differences in cochlear filtering |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6435318/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30874501 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.41626 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT walkerkerrymm acrossspeciesdifferencesinpitchperceptionareconsistentwithdifferencesincochlearfiltering AT gonzalezray acrossspeciesdifferencesinpitchperceptionareconsistentwithdifferencesincochlearfiltering AT kangjoez acrossspeciesdifferencesinpitchperceptionareconsistentwithdifferencesincochlearfiltering AT mcdermottjoshh acrossspeciesdifferencesinpitchperceptionareconsistentwithdifferencesincochlearfiltering AT kingandrewj acrossspeciesdifferencesinpitchperceptionareconsistentwithdifferencesincochlearfiltering |