Cargando…

Resource Crafting: Is It Really ‘Resource’ Crafting—Or Just Crafting?

This study aims to provide an integrated perspective on job crafting and its antecedents through the exploration of the joint effects of individual-level and team-level job crafting on employee work engagement. Drawing on conservation of resources (COR) theory, we propose that engaging in job crafti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hu, Qiao, Schaufeli, Wilmar B., Taris, Toon W., Shimazu, Akihito, Dollard, Maureen F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6435585/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30949108
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00614
_version_ 1783406664176631808
author Hu, Qiao
Schaufeli, Wilmar B.
Taris, Toon W.
Shimazu, Akihito
Dollard, Maureen F.
author_facet Hu, Qiao
Schaufeli, Wilmar B.
Taris, Toon W.
Shimazu, Akihito
Dollard, Maureen F.
author_sort Hu, Qiao
collection PubMed
description This study aims to provide an integrated perspective on job crafting and its antecedents through the exploration of the joint effects of individual-level and team-level job crafting on employee work engagement. Drawing on conservation of resources (COR) theory, we propose that engaging in job crafting behaviors is promoted by the presence of job-related resources. In turn, job crafting is expected to result in higher levels of work engagement. We expect this reasoning to hold for the individual as well as the team/collective levels. The hypotheses were tested using data from 287 medical professionals from 21 hospital units of a Chinese public hospital. Findings from two-level Bayesian structural equation modeling supported the idea that at the individual level, individual job crafting behaviors partially mediated the relationship from individual resources to individual work engagement. Further, collective crafting mediated the relationship from team resources to individual work engagement. In addition, a positive cross-level relation between collective crafting and individual crafting was found. We conclude that stimulated by resources, both job crafting processes at the individual-level and team-level can promote individual work engagement in Chinese employees.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6435585
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64355852019-04-04 Resource Crafting: Is It Really ‘Resource’ Crafting—Or Just Crafting? Hu, Qiao Schaufeli, Wilmar B. Taris, Toon W. Shimazu, Akihito Dollard, Maureen F. Front Psychol Psychology This study aims to provide an integrated perspective on job crafting and its antecedents through the exploration of the joint effects of individual-level and team-level job crafting on employee work engagement. Drawing on conservation of resources (COR) theory, we propose that engaging in job crafting behaviors is promoted by the presence of job-related resources. In turn, job crafting is expected to result in higher levels of work engagement. We expect this reasoning to hold for the individual as well as the team/collective levels. The hypotheses were tested using data from 287 medical professionals from 21 hospital units of a Chinese public hospital. Findings from two-level Bayesian structural equation modeling supported the idea that at the individual level, individual job crafting behaviors partially mediated the relationship from individual resources to individual work engagement. Further, collective crafting mediated the relationship from team resources to individual work engagement. In addition, a positive cross-level relation between collective crafting and individual crafting was found. We conclude that stimulated by resources, both job crafting processes at the individual-level and team-level can promote individual work engagement in Chinese employees. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6435585/ /pubmed/30949108 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00614 Text en Copyright © 2019 Hu, Schaufeli, Taris, Shimazu and Dollard. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Hu, Qiao
Schaufeli, Wilmar B.
Taris, Toon W.
Shimazu, Akihito
Dollard, Maureen F.
Resource Crafting: Is It Really ‘Resource’ Crafting—Or Just Crafting?
title Resource Crafting: Is It Really ‘Resource’ Crafting—Or Just Crafting?
title_full Resource Crafting: Is It Really ‘Resource’ Crafting—Or Just Crafting?
title_fullStr Resource Crafting: Is It Really ‘Resource’ Crafting—Or Just Crafting?
title_full_unstemmed Resource Crafting: Is It Really ‘Resource’ Crafting—Or Just Crafting?
title_short Resource Crafting: Is It Really ‘Resource’ Crafting—Or Just Crafting?
title_sort resource crafting: is it really ‘resource’ crafting—or just crafting?
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6435585/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30949108
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00614
work_keys_str_mv AT huqiao resourcecraftingisitreallyresourcecraftingorjustcrafting
AT schaufeliwilmarb resourcecraftingisitreallyresourcecraftingorjustcrafting
AT taristoonw resourcecraftingisitreallyresourcecraftingorjustcrafting
AT shimazuakihito resourcecraftingisitreallyresourcecraftingorjustcrafting
AT dollardmaureenf resourcecraftingisitreallyresourcecraftingorjustcrafting