Cargando…

Chemosensory Event-Related Potentials in Response to Nasal Propylene Glycol Stimulation

Propylene glycol, also denoted as 1.2 propanediol (C(3)H(8)O(2)), often serves as a solvent for dilution of olfactory stimuli. It is supposed to serve as a neutral substance and has been used in many behavioral and electrophysiological studies to dilute pure olfactory stimuli. However, the effect of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sirous, Mohammad, Sinning, Nico, Schneider, Till R., Friese, Uwe, Lorenz, Jürgen, Engel, Andreas K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6435593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30949040
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00099
_version_ 1783406666055680000
author Sirous, Mohammad
Sinning, Nico
Schneider, Till R.
Friese, Uwe
Lorenz, Jürgen
Engel, Andreas K.
author_facet Sirous, Mohammad
Sinning, Nico
Schneider, Till R.
Friese, Uwe
Lorenz, Jürgen
Engel, Andreas K.
author_sort Sirous, Mohammad
collection PubMed
description Propylene glycol, also denoted as 1.2 propanediol (C(3)H(8)O(2)), often serves as a solvent for dilution of olfactory stimuli. It is supposed to serve as a neutral substance and has been used in many behavioral and electrophysiological studies to dilute pure olfactory stimuli. However, the effect of propylene glycol on perception and on neuronal responses has hitherto never been studied. In this study we tested by means of a threshold test, whether a nasal propylene glycol stimulation is recognizable by humans. Participants were able to recognize propylene glycol at a threshold of 42% concentration and reported a slight cooling effect. In addition to the threshold test, we recorded electroencephalography (EEG) during nasal propylene glycol stimulation to study the neuronal processing of the stimulus. We used a flow olfactometer and stimulated 15 volunteers with three different concentrations of propylene glycol (40 trials each) and water as a control condition (40 trials). To evaluate the neuronal response, we analyzed the event-related potentials (ERPs) and power modulations. The task of the volunteers was to identify a change (olfactory, thermal, or tactile) in the continuous air flow generated by the flow olfactometer. The analysis of the ERPs showed that propylene glycol generates a clear P2 component, which was also visible in the frequency domain as an evoked power response in the theta-band. The source analysis of the P2 revealed a widespread involvement of brain regions, including the postcentral gyrus, the insula and adjacent operculum, the thalamus, and the cerebellum. Thus, it is possible that trigeminal stimulation can at least partly account for sensations and brain responses elicited by propylene glycol. Based on these results, we conclude that the use of high propylene glycol concentrations to dilute fragrances complicates the interpretation of presumed purely olfactory effects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6435593
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64355932019-04-04 Chemosensory Event-Related Potentials in Response to Nasal Propylene Glycol Stimulation Sirous, Mohammad Sinning, Nico Schneider, Till R. Friese, Uwe Lorenz, Jürgen Engel, Andreas K. Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Propylene glycol, also denoted as 1.2 propanediol (C(3)H(8)O(2)), often serves as a solvent for dilution of olfactory stimuli. It is supposed to serve as a neutral substance and has been used in many behavioral and electrophysiological studies to dilute pure olfactory stimuli. However, the effect of propylene glycol on perception and on neuronal responses has hitherto never been studied. In this study we tested by means of a threshold test, whether a nasal propylene glycol stimulation is recognizable by humans. Participants were able to recognize propylene glycol at a threshold of 42% concentration and reported a slight cooling effect. In addition to the threshold test, we recorded electroencephalography (EEG) during nasal propylene glycol stimulation to study the neuronal processing of the stimulus. We used a flow olfactometer and stimulated 15 volunteers with three different concentrations of propylene glycol (40 trials each) and water as a control condition (40 trials). To evaluate the neuronal response, we analyzed the event-related potentials (ERPs) and power modulations. The task of the volunteers was to identify a change (olfactory, thermal, or tactile) in the continuous air flow generated by the flow olfactometer. The analysis of the ERPs showed that propylene glycol generates a clear P2 component, which was also visible in the frequency domain as an evoked power response in the theta-band. The source analysis of the P2 revealed a widespread involvement of brain regions, including the postcentral gyrus, the insula and adjacent operculum, the thalamus, and the cerebellum. Thus, it is possible that trigeminal stimulation can at least partly account for sensations and brain responses elicited by propylene glycol. Based on these results, we conclude that the use of high propylene glycol concentrations to dilute fragrances complicates the interpretation of presumed purely olfactory effects. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6435593/ /pubmed/30949040 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00099 Text en Copyright © 2019 Sirous, Sinning, Schneider, Friese, Lorenz and Engel. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Sirous, Mohammad
Sinning, Nico
Schneider, Till R.
Friese, Uwe
Lorenz, Jürgen
Engel, Andreas K.
Chemosensory Event-Related Potentials in Response to Nasal Propylene Glycol Stimulation
title Chemosensory Event-Related Potentials in Response to Nasal Propylene Glycol Stimulation
title_full Chemosensory Event-Related Potentials in Response to Nasal Propylene Glycol Stimulation
title_fullStr Chemosensory Event-Related Potentials in Response to Nasal Propylene Glycol Stimulation
title_full_unstemmed Chemosensory Event-Related Potentials in Response to Nasal Propylene Glycol Stimulation
title_short Chemosensory Event-Related Potentials in Response to Nasal Propylene Glycol Stimulation
title_sort chemosensory event-related potentials in response to nasal propylene glycol stimulation
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6435593/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30949040
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00099
work_keys_str_mv AT sirousmohammad chemosensoryeventrelatedpotentialsinresponsetonasalpropyleneglycolstimulation
AT sinningnico chemosensoryeventrelatedpotentialsinresponsetonasalpropyleneglycolstimulation
AT schneidertillr chemosensoryeventrelatedpotentialsinresponsetonasalpropyleneglycolstimulation
AT frieseuwe chemosensoryeventrelatedpotentialsinresponsetonasalpropyleneglycolstimulation
AT lorenzjurgen chemosensoryeventrelatedpotentialsinresponsetonasalpropyleneglycolstimulation
AT engelandreask chemosensoryeventrelatedpotentialsinresponsetonasalpropyleneglycolstimulation