Cargando…
Adaptation and qualitative evaluation of encounter decision aids in breast cancer care
PURPOSE: Shared decision-making is currently not widely implemented in breast cancer care. Encounter decision aids support shared decision-making by helping patients and physicians compare treatment options. So far, little was known about adaptation needs for translated encounter decision aids, and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6435605/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30649604 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-5035-7 |
_version_ | 1783406668843843584 |
---|---|
author | Hahlweg, Pola Witzel, Isabell Müller, Volkmar Elwyn, Glyn Durand, Marie-Anne Scholl, Isabelle |
author_facet | Hahlweg, Pola Witzel, Isabell Müller, Volkmar Elwyn, Glyn Durand, Marie-Anne Scholl, Isabelle |
author_sort | Hahlweg, Pola |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Shared decision-making is currently not widely implemented in breast cancer care. Encounter decision aids support shared decision-making by helping patients and physicians compare treatment options. So far, little was known about adaptation needs for translated encounter decision aids, and encounter decision aids for breast cancer treatments were not available in Germany. This study aimed to adapt and evaluate the implementation of two encounter decision aids on breast cancer treatments in routine care. METHODS: We conducted a multi-phase qualitative study: (1) translation of two breast cancer Option Grid™ decision aids; comparison to national clinical standards; cognitive interviews to test patients’ understanding; (2) focus groups to assess acceptability; (3) testing in routine care using participant observation. Data were analysed using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: Physicians and patients reacted positively to the idea of encounter decision aids, and reported being interested in using them; patients were most receptive. Several adaptation cycles were necessary. Uncertainty about feasibility of using encounter decision aids in clinical settings was the main physician-reported barrier. During real-world testing (N = 77 encounters), physicians used encounter decision aids in one-third of potentially relevant encounters. However, they did not use the encounter decision aids to stimulate dialogue, which is contrary to their original scope and purpose. CONCLUSIONS: The idea of using encounter decision aids was welcomed, but more by patients than by physicians. Adaptation was a complex process and required resources. Clinicians did not follow suggested strategies for using encounter decision aids. Our study indicates that production of encounter decision aids alone will not lead to successful implementation, and has to be accompanied by training of health care providers. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00404-018-5035-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6435605 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64356052019-04-15 Adaptation and qualitative evaluation of encounter decision aids in breast cancer care Hahlweg, Pola Witzel, Isabell Müller, Volkmar Elwyn, Glyn Durand, Marie-Anne Scholl, Isabelle Arch Gynecol Obstet Gynecologic Oncology PURPOSE: Shared decision-making is currently not widely implemented in breast cancer care. Encounter decision aids support shared decision-making by helping patients and physicians compare treatment options. So far, little was known about adaptation needs for translated encounter decision aids, and encounter decision aids for breast cancer treatments were not available in Germany. This study aimed to adapt and evaluate the implementation of two encounter decision aids on breast cancer treatments in routine care. METHODS: We conducted a multi-phase qualitative study: (1) translation of two breast cancer Option Grid™ decision aids; comparison to national clinical standards; cognitive interviews to test patients’ understanding; (2) focus groups to assess acceptability; (3) testing in routine care using participant observation. Data were analysed using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: Physicians and patients reacted positively to the idea of encounter decision aids, and reported being interested in using them; patients were most receptive. Several adaptation cycles were necessary. Uncertainty about feasibility of using encounter decision aids in clinical settings was the main physician-reported barrier. During real-world testing (N = 77 encounters), physicians used encounter decision aids in one-third of potentially relevant encounters. However, they did not use the encounter decision aids to stimulate dialogue, which is contrary to their original scope and purpose. CONCLUSIONS: The idea of using encounter decision aids was welcomed, but more by patients than by physicians. Adaptation was a complex process and required resources. Clinicians did not follow suggested strategies for using encounter decision aids. Our study indicates that production of encounter decision aids alone will not lead to successful implementation, and has to be accompanied by training of health care providers. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00404-018-5035-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-01-16 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6435605/ /pubmed/30649604 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-5035-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Gynecologic Oncology Hahlweg, Pola Witzel, Isabell Müller, Volkmar Elwyn, Glyn Durand, Marie-Anne Scholl, Isabelle Adaptation and qualitative evaluation of encounter decision aids in breast cancer care |
title | Adaptation and qualitative evaluation of encounter decision aids in breast cancer care |
title_full | Adaptation and qualitative evaluation of encounter decision aids in breast cancer care |
title_fullStr | Adaptation and qualitative evaluation of encounter decision aids in breast cancer care |
title_full_unstemmed | Adaptation and qualitative evaluation of encounter decision aids in breast cancer care |
title_short | Adaptation and qualitative evaluation of encounter decision aids in breast cancer care |
title_sort | adaptation and qualitative evaluation of encounter decision aids in breast cancer care |
topic | Gynecologic Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6435605/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30649604 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-5035-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hahlwegpola adaptationandqualitativeevaluationofencounterdecisionaidsinbreastcancercare AT witzelisabell adaptationandqualitativeevaluationofencounterdecisionaidsinbreastcancercare AT mullervolkmar adaptationandqualitativeevaluationofencounterdecisionaidsinbreastcancercare AT elwynglyn adaptationandqualitativeevaluationofencounterdecisionaidsinbreastcancercare AT durandmarieanne adaptationandqualitativeevaluationofencounterdecisionaidsinbreastcancercare AT schollisabelle adaptationandqualitativeevaluationofencounterdecisionaidsinbreastcancercare |