Cargando…

Predicting long-term sickness absence among employees with frequent sickness absence

PURPOSE: Frequent absentees are at risk of long-term sickness absence (SA). The aim of the study is to develop prediction models for long-term SA among frequent absentees. METHODS: Data were obtained from 53,833 workers who participated in occupational health surveys in the period 2010–2013; 4204 of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Notenbomer, Annette, van Rhenen, Willem, Groothoff, Johan W., Roelen, Corné A. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6435617/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30474733
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00420-018-1384-6
_version_ 1783406671666610176
author Notenbomer, Annette
van Rhenen, Willem
Groothoff, Johan W.
Roelen, Corné A. M.
author_facet Notenbomer, Annette
van Rhenen, Willem
Groothoff, Johan W.
Roelen, Corné A. M.
author_sort Notenbomer, Annette
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Frequent absentees are at risk of long-term sickness absence (SA). The aim of the study is to develop prediction models for long-term SA among frequent absentees. METHODS: Data were obtained from 53,833 workers who participated in occupational health surveys in the period 2010–2013; 4204 of them were frequent absentees (i.e., employees with ≥ 3 SA spells in the year prior to the survey). The survey data of the frequent absentees were used to develop two prediction models: model 1 including job demands and job resources and model 2 including burnout and work engagement. Discrimination between frequent absentees with and without long-term SA during follow-up was assessed with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC); (AUC) ≥ 0.75 was considered useful for practice. RESULTS: A total of 3563 employees had complete data for analyses and 685 (19%) of them had long-term SA during 1-year follow-up. The final model 1 included age, gender, education, marital status, prior long-term SA, work pace, role clarity and learning opportunities. Discrimination between frequent absentees with and without long-term SA was significant (AUC 0.623; 95% CI 0.601–0.646), but not useful for practice. Model 2 showed comparable discrimination (AUC 0.624; 95% CI 0.596–0.651) with age, gender, education, marital status, prior long-term SA, burnout and work engagement as predictor variables. Differentiating by gender or sickness absence cause did not result in better discrimination. CONCLUSIONS: Both prediction models discriminated significantly between frequent absentees with and without long-term SA during 1-year follow-up, but have to be further developed for use in healthcare practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6435617
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64356172019-04-15 Predicting long-term sickness absence among employees with frequent sickness absence Notenbomer, Annette van Rhenen, Willem Groothoff, Johan W. Roelen, Corné A. M. Int Arch Occup Environ Health Original Article PURPOSE: Frequent absentees are at risk of long-term sickness absence (SA). The aim of the study is to develop prediction models for long-term SA among frequent absentees. METHODS: Data were obtained from 53,833 workers who participated in occupational health surveys in the period 2010–2013; 4204 of them were frequent absentees (i.e., employees with ≥ 3 SA spells in the year prior to the survey). The survey data of the frequent absentees were used to develop two prediction models: model 1 including job demands and job resources and model 2 including burnout and work engagement. Discrimination between frequent absentees with and without long-term SA during follow-up was assessed with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC); (AUC) ≥ 0.75 was considered useful for practice. RESULTS: A total of 3563 employees had complete data for analyses and 685 (19%) of them had long-term SA during 1-year follow-up. The final model 1 included age, gender, education, marital status, prior long-term SA, work pace, role clarity and learning opportunities. Discrimination between frequent absentees with and without long-term SA was significant (AUC 0.623; 95% CI 0.601–0.646), but not useful for practice. Model 2 showed comparable discrimination (AUC 0.624; 95% CI 0.596–0.651) with age, gender, education, marital status, prior long-term SA, burnout and work engagement as predictor variables. Differentiating by gender or sickness absence cause did not result in better discrimination. CONCLUSIONS: Both prediction models discriminated significantly between frequent absentees with and without long-term SA during 1-year follow-up, but have to be further developed for use in healthcare practice. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-11-24 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6435617/ /pubmed/30474733 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00420-018-1384-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Notenbomer, Annette
van Rhenen, Willem
Groothoff, Johan W.
Roelen, Corné A. M.
Predicting long-term sickness absence among employees with frequent sickness absence
title Predicting long-term sickness absence among employees with frequent sickness absence
title_full Predicting long-term sickness absence among employees with frequent sickness absence
title_fullStr Predicting long-term sickness absence among employees with frequent sickness absence
title_full_unstemmed Predicting long-term sickness absence among employees with frequent sickness absence
title_short Predicting long-term sickness absence among employees with frequent sickness absence
title_sort predicting long-term sickness absence among employees with frequent sickness absence
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6435617/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30474733
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00420-018-1384-6
work_keys_str_mv AT notenbomerannette predictinglongtermsicknessabsenceamongemployeeswithfrequentsicknessabsence
AT vanrhenenwillem predictinglongtermsicknessabsenceamongemployeeswithfrequentsicknessabsence
AT groothoffjohanw predictinglongtermsicknessabsenceamongemployeeswithfrequentsicknessabsence
AT roelencorneam predictinglongtermsicknessabsenceamongemployeeswithfrequentsicknessabsence