Cargando…

Interfacial Stress in the Development of Biologics: Fundamental Understanding, Current Practice, and Future Perspective

Biologic products encounter various types of interfacial stress during development, manufacturing, and clinical administration. When proteins come in contact with vapor–liquid, solid–liquid, and liquid–liquid surfaces, these interfaces can significantly impact the protein drug product quality attrib...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Jinjiang, Krause, Mary E., Chen, Xiaodong, Cheng, Yuan, Dai, Weiguo, Hill, John J., Huang, Min, Jordan, Susan, LaCasse, Daniel, Narhi, Linda, Shalaev, Evgenyi, Shieh, Ian C., Thomas, Justin C., Tu, Raymond, Zheng, Songyan, Zhu, Lily
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6435788/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30915582
http://dx.doi.org/10.1208/s12248-019-0312-3
_version_ 1783406708200046592
author Li, Jinjiang
Krause, Mary E.
Chen, Xiaodong
Cheng, Yuan
Dai, Weiguo
Hill, John J.
Huang, Min
Jordan, Susan
LaCasse, Daniel
Narhi, Linda
Shalaev, Evgenyi
Shieh, Ian C.
Thomas, Justin C.
Tu, Raymond
Zheng, Songyan
Zhu, Lily
author_facet Li, Jinjiang
Krause, Mary E.
Chen, Xiaodong
Cheng, Yuan
Dai, Weiguo
Hill, John J.
Huang, Min
Jordan, Susan
LaCasse, Daniel
Narhi, Linda
Shalaev, Evgenyi
Shieh, Ian C.
Thomas, Justin C.
Tu, Raymond
Zheng, Songyan
Zhu, Lily
author_sort Li, Jinjiang
collection PubMed
description Biologic products encounter various types of interfacial stress during development, manufacturing, and clinical administration. When proteins come in contact with vapor–liquid, solid–liquid, and liquid–liquid surfaces, these interfaces can significantly impact the protein drug product quality attributes, including formation of visible particles, subvisible particles, or soluble aggregates, or changes in target protein concentration due to adsorption of the molecule to various interfaces. Protein aggregation at interfaces is often accompanied by changes in conformation, as proteins modify their higher order structure in response to interfacial stresses such as hydrophobicity, charge, and mechanical stress. Formation of aggregates may elicit immunogenicity concerns; therefore, it is important to minimize opportunities for aggregation by performing a systematic evaluation of interfacial stress throughout the product development cycle and to develop appropriate mitigation strategies. The purpose of this white paper is to provide an understanding of protein interfacial stability, explore methods to understand interfacial behavior of proteins, then describe current industry approaches to address interfacial stability concerns. Specifically, we will discuss interfacial stresses to which proteins are exposed from drug substance manufacture through clinical administration, as well as the analytical techniques used to evaluate the resulting impact on the stability of the protein. A high-level mechanistic understanding of the relationship between interfacial stress and aggregation will be introduced, as well as some novel techniques for measuring and better understanding the interfacial behavior of proteins. Finally, some best practices in the evaluation and minimization of interfacial stress will be recommended.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6435788
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64357882019-04-15 Interfacial Stress in the Development of Biologics: Fundamental Understanding, Current Practice, and Future Perspective Li, Jinjiang Krause, Mary E. Chen, Xiaodong Cheng, Yuan Dai, Weiguo Hill, John J. Huang, Min Jordan, Susan LaCasse, Daniel Narhi, Linda Shalaev, Evgenyi Shieh, Ian C. Thomas, Justin C. Tu, Raymond Zheng, Songyan Zhu, Lily AAPS J White Paper Biologic products encounter various types of interfacial stress during development, manufacturing, and clinical administration. When proteins come in contact with vapor–liquid, solid–liquid, and liquid–liquid surfaces, these interfaces can significantly impact the protein drug product quality attributes, including formation of visible particles, subvisible particles, or soluble aggregates, or changes in target protein concentration due to adsorption of the molecule to various interfaces. Protein aggregation at interfaces is often accompanied by changes in conformation, as proteins modify their higher order structure in response to interfacial stresses such as hydrophobicity, charge, and mechanical stress. Formation of aggregates may elicit immunogenicity concerns; therefore, it is important to minimize opportunities for aggregation by performing a systematic evaluation of interfacial stress throughout the product development cycle and to develop appropriate mitigation strategies. The purpose of this white paper is to provide an understanding of protein interfacial stability, explore methods to understand interfacial behavior of proteins, then describe current industry approaches to address interfacial stability concerns. Specifically, we will discuss interfacial stresses to which proteins are exposed from drug substance manufacture through clinical administration, as well as the analytical techniques used to evaluate the resulting impact on the stability of the protein. A high-level mechanistic understanding of the relationship between interfacial stress and aggregation will be introduced, as well as some novel techniques for measuring and better understanding the interfacial behavior of proteins. Finally, some best practices in the evaluation and minimization of interfacial stress will be recommended. Springer International Publishing 2019-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6435788/ /pubmed/30915582 http://dx.doi.org/10.1208/s12248-019-0312-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle White Paper
Li, Jinjiang
Krause, Mary E.
Chen, Xiaodong
Cheng, Yuan
Dai, Weiguo
Hill, John J.
Huang, Min
Jordan, Susan
LaCasse, Daniel
Narhi, Linda
Shalaev, Evgenyi
Shieh, Ian C.
Thomas, Justin C.
Tu, Raymond
Zheng, Songyan
Zhu, Lily
Interfacial Stress in the Development of Biologics: Fundamental Understanding, Current Practice, and Future Perspective
title Interfacial Stress in the Development of Biologics: Fundamental Understanding, Current Practice, and Future Perspective
title_full Interfacial Stress in the Development of Biologics: Fundamental Understanding, Current Practice, and Future Perspective
title_fullStr Interfacial Stress in the Development of Biologics: Fundamental Understanding, Current Practice, and Future Perspective
title_full_unstemmed Interfacial Stress in the Development of Biologics: Fundamental Understanding, Current Practice, and Future Perspective
title_short Interfacial Stress in the Development of Biologics: Fundamental Understanding, Current Practice, and Future Perspective
title_sort interfacial stress in the development of biologics: fundamental understanding, current practice, and future perspective
topic White Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6435788/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30915582
http://dx.doi.org/10.1208/s12248-019-0312-3
work_keys_str_mv AT lijinjiang interfacialstressinthedevelopmentofbiologicsfundamentalunderstandingcurrentpracticeandfutureperspective
AT krausemarye interfacialstressinthedevelopmentofbiologicsfundamentalunderstandingcurrentpracticeandfutureperspective
AT chenxiaodong interfacialstressinthedevelopmentofbiologicsfundamentalunderstandingcurrentpracticeandfutureperspective
AT chengyuan interfacialstressinthedevelopmentofbiologicsfundamentalunderstandingcurrentpracticeandfutureperspective
AT daiweiguo interfacialstressinthedevelopmentofbiologicsfundamentalunderstandingcurrentpracticeandfutureperspective
AT hilljohnj interfacialstressinthedevelopmentofbiologicsfundamentalunderstandingcurrentpracticeandfutureperspective
AT huangmin interfacialstressinthedevelopmentofbiologicsfundamentalunderstandingcurrentpracticeandfutureperspective
AT jordansusan interfacialstressinthedevelopmentofbiologicsfundamentalunderstandingcurrentpracticeandfutureperspective
AT lacassedaniel interfacialstressinthedevelopmentofbiologicsfundamentalunderstandingcurrentpracticeandfutureperspective
AT narhilinda interfacialstressinthedevelopmentofbiologicsfundamentalunderstandingcurrentpracticeandfutureperspective
AT shalaevevgenyi interfacialstressinthedevelopmentofbiologicsfundamentalunderstandingcurrentpracticeandfutureperspective
AT shiehianc interfacialstressinthedevelopmentofbiologicsfundamentalunderstandingcurrentpracticeandfutureperspective
AT thomasjustinc interfacialstressinthedevelopmentofbiologicsfundamentalunderstandingcurrentpracticeandfutureperspective
AT turaymond interfacialstressinthedevelopmentofbiologicsfundamentalunderstandingcurrentpracticeandfutureperspective
AT zhengsongyan interfacialstressinthedevelopmentofbiologicsfundamentalunderstandingcurrentpracticeandfutureperspective
AT zhulily interfacialstressinthedevelopmentofbiologicsfundamentalunderstandingcurrentpracticeandfutureperspective