Cargando…
Interfacial Stress in the Development of Biologics: Fundamental Understanding, Current Practice, and Future Perspective
Biologic products encounter various types of interfacial stress during development, manufacturing, and clinical administration. When proteins come in contact with vapor–liquid, solid–liquid, and liquid–liquid surfaces, these interfaces can significantly impact the protein drug product quality attrib...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6435788/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30915582 http://dx.doi.org/10.1208/s12248-019-0312-3 |
_version_ | 1783406708200046592 |
---|---|
author | Li, Jinjiang Krause, Mary E. Chen, Xiaodong Cheng, Yuan Dai, Weiguo Hill, John J. Huang, Min Jordan, Susan LaCasse, Daniel Narhi, Linda Shalaev, Evgenyi Shieh, Ian C. Thomas, Justin C. Tu, Raymond Zheng, Songyan Zhu, Lily |
author_facet | Li, Jinjiang Krause, Mary E. Chen, Xiaodong Cheng, Yuan Dai, Weiguo Hill, John J. Huang, Min Jordan, Susan LaCasse, Daniel Narhi, Linda Shalaev, Evgenyi Shieh, Ian C. Thomas, Justin C. Tu, Raymond Zheng, Songyan Zhu, Lily |
author_sort | Li, Jinjiang |
collection | PubMed |
description | Biologic products encounter various types of interfacial stress during development, manufacturing, and clinical administration. When proteins come in contact with vapor–liquid, solid–liquid, and liquid–liquid surfaces, these interfaces can significantly impact the protein drug product quality attributes, including formation of visible particles, subvisible particles, or soluble aggregates, or changes in target protein concentration due to adsorption of the molecule to various interfaces. Protein aggregation at interfaces is often accompanied by changes in conformation, as proteins modify their higher order structure in response to interfacial stresses such as hydrophobicity, charge, and mechanical stress. Formation of aggregates may elicit immunogenicity concerns; therefore, it is important to minimize opportunities for aggregation by performing a systematic evaluation of interfacial stress throughout the product development cycle and to develop appropriate mitigation strategies. The purpose of this white paper is to provide an understanding of protein interfacial stability, explore methods to understand interfacial behavior of proteins, then describe current industry approaches to address interfacial stability concerns. Specifically, we will discuss interfacial stresses to which proteins are exposed from drug substance manufacture through clinical administration, as well as the analytical techniques used to evaluate the resulting impact on the stability of the protein. A high-level mechanistic understanding of the relationship between interfacial stress and aggregation will be introduced, as well as some novel techniques for measuring and better understanding the interfacial behavior of proteins. Finally, some best practices in the evaluation and minimization of interfacial stress will be recommended. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6435788 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64357882019-04-15 Interfacial Stress in the Development of Biologics: Fundamental Understanding, Current Practice, and Future Perspective Li, Jinjiang Krause, Mary E. Chen, Xiaodong Cheng, Yuan Dai, Weiguo Hill, John J. Huang, Min Jordan, Susan LaCasse, Daniel Narhi, Linda Shalaev, Evgenyi Shieh, Ian C. Thomas, Justin C. Tu, Raymond Zheng, Songyan Zhu, Lily AAPS J White Paper Biologic products encounter various types of interfacial stress during development, manufacturing, and clinical administration. When proteins come in contact with vapor–liquid, solid–liquid, and liquid–liquid surfaces, these interfaces can significantly impact the protein drug product quality attributes, including formation of visible particles, subvisible particles, or soluble aggregates, or changes in target protein concentration due to adsorption of the molecule to various interfaces. Protein aggregation at interfaces is often accompanied by changes in conformation, as proteins modify their higher order structure in response to interfacial stresses such as hydrophobicity, charge, and mechanical stress. Formation of aggregates may elicit immunogenicity concerns; therefore, it is important to minimize opportunities for aggregation by performing a systematic evaluation of interfacial stress throughout the product development cycle and to develop appropriate mitigation strategies. The purpose of this white paper is to provide an understanding of protein interfacial stability, explore methods to understand interfacial behavior of proteins, then describe current industry approaches to address interfacial stability concerns. Specifically, we will discuss interfacial stresses to which proteins are exposed from drug substance manufacture through clinical administration, as well as the analytical techniques used to evaluate the resulting impact on the stability of the protein. A high-level mechanistic understanding of the relationship between interfacial stress and aggregation will be introduced, as well as some novel techniques for measuring and better understanding the interfacial behavior of proteins. Finally, some best practices in the evaluation and minimization of interfacial stress will be recommended. Springer International Publishing 2019-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6435788/ /pubmed/30915582 http://dx.doi.org/10.1208/s12248-019-0312-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | White Paper Li, Jinjiang Krause, Mary E. Chen, Xiaodong Cheng, Yuan Dai, Weiguo Hill, John J. Huang, Min Jordan, Susan LaCasse, Daniel Narhi, Linda Shalaev, Evgenyi Shieh, Ian C. Thomas, Justin C. Tu, Raymond Zheng, Songyan Zhu, Lily Interfacial Stress in the Development of Biologics: Fundamental Understanding, Current Practice, and Future Perspective |
title | Interfacial Stress in the Development of Biologics: Fundamental Understanding, Current Practice, and Future Perspective |
title_full | Interfacial Stress in the Development of Biologics: Fundamental Understanding, Current Practice, and Future Perspective |
title_fullStr | Interfacial Stress in the Development of Biologics: Fundamental Understanding, Current Practice, and Future Perspective |
title_full_unstemmed | Interfacial Stress in the Development of Biologics: Fundamental Understanding, Current Practice, and Future Perspective |
title_short | Interfacial Stress in the Development of Biologics: Fundamental Understanding, Current Practice, and Future Perspective |
title_sort | interfacial stress in the development of biologics: fundamental understanding, current practice, and future perspective |
topic | White Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6435788/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30915582 http://dx.doi.org/10.1208/s12248-019-0312-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lijinjiang interfacialstressinthedevelopmentofbiologicsfundamentalunderstandingcurrentpracticeandfutureperspective AT krausemarye interfacialstressinthedevelopmentofbiologicsfundamentalunderstandingcurrentpracticeandfutureperspective AT chenxiaodong interfacialstressinthedevelopmentofbiologicsfundamentalunderstandingcurrentpracticeandfutureperspective AT chengyuan interfacialstressinthedevelopmentofbiologicsfundamentalunderstandingcurrentpracticeandfutureperspective AT daiweiguo interfacialstressinthedevelopmentofbiologicsfundamentalunderstandingcurrentpracticeandfutureperspective AT hilljohnj interfacialstressinthedevelopmentofbiologicsfundamentalunderstandingcurrentpracticeandfutureperspective AT huangmin interfacialstressinthedevelopmentofbiologicsfundamentalunderstandingcurrentpracticeandfutureperspective AT jordansusan interfacialstressinthedevelopmentofbiologicsfundamentalunderstandingcurrentpracticeandfutureperspective AT lacassedaniel interfacialstressinthedevelopmentofbiologicsfundamentalunderstandingcurrentpracticeandfutureperspective AT narhilinda interfacialstressinthedevelopmentofbiologicsfundamentalunderstandingcurrentpracticeandfutureperspective AT shalaevevgenyi interfacialstressinthedevelopmentofbiologicsfundamentalunderstandingcurrentpracticeandfutureperspective AT shiehianc interfacialstressinthedevelopmentofbiologicsfundamentalunderstandingcurrentpracticeandfutureperspective AT thomasjustinc interfacialstressinthedevelopmentofbiologicsfundamentalunderstandingcurrentpracticeandfutureperspective AT turaymond interfacialstressinthedevelopmentofbiologicsfundamentalunderstandingcurrentpracticeandfutureperspective AT zhengsongyan interfacialstressinthedevelopmentofbiologicsfundamentalunderstandingcurrentpracticeandfutureperspective AT zhulily interfacialstressinthedevelopmentofbiologicsfundamentalunderstandingcurrentpracticeandfutureperspective |