Cargando…

An investigation into the clinical accuracy of twinkling artifacts in patients with urolithiasis smaller than 5 mm in comparison with computed tomography scanning

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound (US) is a non-invasive method used for the diagnosis of urolithiasis. If the size of the stone is <5 mm, it may be difficult to diagnose. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of twinkling artifact (TA) of color Doppler US imaging with unenhanced computed tomography (CT)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hanafi, Mohammad Qasem, Fakhrizadeh, Ahmad, Jaafaezadeh, Esmat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6436258/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30984645
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_300_18
_version_ 1783406780976463872
author Hanafi, Mohammad Qasem
Fakhrizadeh, Ahmad
Jaafaezadeh, Esmat
author_facet Hanafi, Mohammad Qasem
Fakhrizadeh, Ahmad
Jaafaezadeh, Esmat
author_sort Hanafi, Mohammad Qasem
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ultrasound (US) is a non-invasive method used for the diagnosis of urolithiasis. If the size of the stone is <5 mm, it may be difficult to diagnose. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of twinkling artifact (TA) of color Doppler US imaging with unenhanced computed tomography (CT) for detecting urolithiasis <5 mm. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study was conducted on 100 patients with suspected renal calculus presented to the emergency room at the Imam Khomeini Hospital of Ahwaz in 2018. The US findings such as posterior acoustic shadowing and TA were examined for their ability to detect urinary stones (greatest diameter ≤5 mm) using CT findings as the gold standard. RESULTS: The mean size of renal stone was 3.43 ± 0.80 mm in CT and 3.49 ± 0.82 mm in color Doppler US. There was no significant difference between CT and color Doppler US report in quantification of urolithiasis sizes (P = 0.603). TA on color Doppler US was detected in 94 (94%) patients while posterior acoustic shadow was detected in 83 (83%) patients (P = 0.004). A significant difference was found between the TA and size of stones (P = 0.036). The sensitivity, accuracy, and positive predictive values of TA for the detection of calculus were 94%, 94%, and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrated that TA on color Doppler US could be a good and safe alternative imaging modality with comparable results with non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography for the sensitive detection of urolithiasis <5 mm.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6436258
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64362582019-04-12 An investigation into the clinical accuracy of twinkling artifacts in patients with urolithiasis smaller than 5 mm in comparison with computed tomography scanning Hanafi, Mohammad Qasem Fakhrizadeh, Ahmad Jaafaezadeh, Esmat J Family Med Prim Care Original Article BACKGROUND: Ultrasound (US) is a non-invasive method used for the diagnosis of urolithiasis. If the size of the stone is <5 mm, it may be difficult to diagnose. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of twinkling artifact (TA) of color Doppler US imaging with unenhanced computed tomography (CT) for detecting urolithiasis <5 mm. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study was conducted on 100 patients with suspected renal calculus presented to the emergency room at the Imam Khomeini Hospital of Ahwaz in 2018. The US findings such as posterior acoustic shadowing and TA were examined for their ability to detect urinary stones (greatest diameter ≤5 mm) using CT findings as the gold standard. RESULTS: The mean size of renal stone was 3.43 ± 0.80 mm in CT and 3.49 ± 0.82 mm in color Doppler US. There was no significant difference between CT and color Doppler US report in quantification of urolithiasis sizes (P = 0.603). TA on color Doppler US was detected in 94 (94%) patients while posterior acoustic shadow was detected in 83 (83%) patients (P = 0.004). A significant difference was found between the TA and size of stones (P = 0.036). The sensitivity, accuracy, and positive predictive values of TA for the detection of calculus were 94%, 94%, and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrated that TA on color Doppler US could be a good and safe alternative imaging modality with comparable results with non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography for the sensitive detection of urolithiasis <5 mm. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2019-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6436258/ /pubmed/30984645 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_300_18 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Hanafi, Mohammad Qasem
Fakhrizadeh, Ahmad
Jaafaezadeh, Esmat
An investigation into the clinical accuracy of twinkling artifacts in patients with urolithiasis smaller than 5 mm in comparison with computed tomography scanning
title An investigation into the clinical accuracy of twinkling artifacts in patients with urolithiasis smaller than 5 mm in comparison with computed tomography scanning
title_full An investigation into the clinical accuracy of twinkling artifacts in patients with urolithiasis smaller than 5 mm in comparison with computed tomography scanning
title_fullStr An investigation into the clinical accuracy of twinkling artifacts in patients with urolithiasis smaller than 5 mm in comparison with computed tomography scanning
title_full_unstemmed An investigation into the clinical accuracy of twinkling artifacts in patients with urolithiasis smaller than 5 mm in comparison with computed tomography scanning
title_short An investigation into the clinical accuracy of twinkling artifacts in patients with urolithiasis smaller than 5 mm in comparison with computed tomography scanning
title_sort investigation into the clinical accuracy of twinkling artifacts in patients with urolithiasis smaller than 5 mm in comparison with computed tomography scanning
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6436258/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30984645
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_300_18
work_keys_str_mv AT hanafimohammadqasem aninvestigationintotheclinicalaccuracyoftwinklingartifactsinpatientswithurolithiasissmallerthan5mmincomparisonwithcomputedtomographyscanning
AT fakhrizadehahmad aninvestigationintotheclinicalaccuracyoftwinklingartifactsinpatientswithurolithiasissmallerthan5mmincomparisonwithcomputedtomographyscanning
AT jaafaezadehesmat aninvestigationintotheclinicalaccuracyoftwinklingartifactsinpatientswithurolithiasissmallerthan5mmincomparisonwithcomputedtomographyscanning
AT hanafimohammadqasem investigationintotheclinicalaccuracyoftwinklingartifactsinpatientswithurolithiasissmallerthan5mmincomparisonwithcomputedtomographyscanning
AT fakhrizadehahmad investigationintotheclinicalaccuracyoftwinklingartifactsinpatientswithurolithiasissmallerthan5mmincomparisonwithcomputedtomographyscanning
AT jaafaezadehesmat investigationintotheclinicalaccuracyoftwinklingartifactsinpatientswithurolithiasissmallerthan5mmincomparisonwithcomputedtomographyscanning