Cargando…
An investigation into the clinical accuracy of twinkling artifacts in patients with urolithiasis smaller than 5 mm in comparison with computed tomography scanning
BACKGROUND: Ultrasound (US) is a non-invasive method used for the diagnosis of urolithiasis. If the size of the stone is <5 mm, it may be difficult to diagnose. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of twinkling artifact (TA) of color Doppler US imaging with unenhanced computed tomography (CT)...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6436258/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30984645 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_300_18 |
_version_ | 1783406780976463872 |
---|---|
author | Hanafi, Mohammad Qasem Fakhrizadeh, Ahmad Jaafaezadeh, Esmat |
author_facet | Hanafi, Mohammad Qasem Fakhrizadeh, Ahmad Jaafaezadeh, Esmat |
author_sort | Hanafi, Mohammad Qasem |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Ultrasound (US) is a non-invasive method used for the diagnosis of urolithiasis. If the size of the stone is <5 mm, it may be difficult to diagnose. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of twinkling artifact (TA) of color Doppler US imaging with unenhanced computed tomography (CT) for detecting urolithiasis <5 mm. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study was conducted on 100 patients with suspected renal calculus presented to the emergency room at the Imam Khomeini Hospital of Ahwaz in 2018. The US findings such as posterior acoustic shadowing and TA were examined for their ability to detect urinary stones (greatest diameter ≤5 mm) using CT findings as the gold standard. RESULTS: The mean size of renal stone was 3.43 ± 0.80 mm in CT and 3.49 ± 0.82 mm in color Doppler US. There was no significant difference between CT and color Doppler US report in quantification of urolithiasis sizes (P = 0.603). TA on color Doppler US was detected in 94 (94%) patients while posterior acoustic shadow was detected in 83 (83%) patients (P = 0.004). A significant difference was found between the TA and size of stones (P = 0.036). The sensitivity, accuracy, and positive predictive values of TA for the detection of calculus were 94%, 94%, and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrated that TA on color Doppler US could be a good and safe alternative imaging modality with comparable results with non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography for the sensitive detection of urolithiasis <5 mm. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6436258 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64362582019-04-12 An investigation into the clinical accuracy of twinkling artifacts in patients with urolithiasis smaller than 5 mm in comparison with computed tomography scanning Hanafi, Mohammad Qasem Fakhrizadeh, Ahmad Jaafaezadeh, Esmat J Family Med Prim Care Original Article BACKGROUND: Ultrasound (US) is a non-invasive method used for the diagnosis of urolithiasis. If the size of the stone is <5 mm, it may be difficult to diagnose. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of twinkling artifact (TA) of color Doppler US imaging with unenhanced computed tomography (CT) for detecting urolithiasis <5 mm. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study was conducted on 100 patients with suspected renal calculus presented to the emergency room at the Imam Khomeini Hospital of Ahwaz in 2018. The US findings such as posterior acoustic shadowing and TA were examined for their ability to detect urinary stones (greatest diameter ≤5 mm) using CT findings as the gold standard. RESULTS: The mean size of renal stone was 3.43 ± 0.80 mm in CT and 3.49 ± 0.82 mm in color Doppler US. There was no significant difference between CT and color Doppler US report in quantification of urolithiasis sizes (P = 0.603). TA on color Doppler US was detected in 94 (94%) patients while posterior acoustic shadow was detected in 83 (83%) patients (P = 0.004). A significant difference was found between the TA and size of stones (P = 0.036). The sensitivity, accuracy, and positive predictive values of TA for the detection of calculus were 94%, 94%, and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrated that TA on color Doppler US could be a good and safe alternative imaging modality with comparable results with non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography for the sensitive detection of urolithiasis <5 mm. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2019-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6436258/ /pubmed/30984645 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_300_18 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Hanafi, Mohammad Qasem Fakhrizadeh, Ahmad Jaafaezadeh, Esmat An investigation into the clinical accuracy of twinkling artifacts in patients with urolithiasis smaller than 5 mm in comparison with computed tomography scanning |
title | An investigation into the clinical accuracy of twinkling artifacts in patients with urolithiasis smaller than 5 mm in comparison with computed tomography scanning |
title_full | An investigation into the clinical accuracy of twinkling artifacts in patients with urolithiasis smaller than 5 mm in comparison with computed tomography scanning |
title_fullStr | An investigation into the clinical accuracy of twinkling artifacts in patients with urolithiasis smaller than 5 mm in comparison with computed tomography scanning |
title_full_unstemmed | An investigation into the clinical accuracy of twinkling artifacts in patients with urolithiasis smaller than 5 mm in comparison with computed tomography scanning |
title_short | An investigation into the clinical accuracy of twinkling artifacts in patients with urolithiasis smaller than 5 mm in comparison with computed tomography scanning |
title_sort | investigation into the clinical accuracy of twinkling artifacts in patients with urolithiasis smaller than 5 mm in comparison with computed tomography scanning |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6436258/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30984645 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_300_18 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hanafimohammadqasem aninvestigationintotheclinicalaccuracyoftwinklingartifactsinpatientswithurolithiasissmallerthan5mmincomparisonwithcomputedtomographyscanning AT fakhrizadehahmad aninvestigationintotheclinicalaccuracyoftwinklingartifactsinpatientswithurolithiasissmallerthan5mmincomparisonwithcomputedtomographyscanning AT jaafaezadehesmat aninvestigationintotheclinicalaccuracyoftwinklingartifactsinpatientswithurolithiasissmallerthan5mmincomparisonwithcomputedtomographyscanning AT hanafimohammadqasem investigationintotheclinicalaccuracyoftwinklingartifactsinpatientswithurolithiasissmallerthan5mmincomparisonwithcomputedtomographyscanning AT fakhrizadehahmad investigationintotheclinicalaccuracyoftwinklingartifactsinpatientswithurolithiasissmallerthan5mmincomparisonwithcomputedtomographyscanning AT jaafaezadehesmat investigationintotheclinicalaccuracyoftwinklingartifactsinpatientswithurolithiasissmallerthan5mmincomparisonwithcomputedtomographyscanning |