Cargando…

Resistance of Synthetic and Biologic Surgical Meshes to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm: An In Vitro Investigation

Surgical meshes have become the standard procedure for a variety of surgical applications with 20 million meshes being implanted each year. The popularity of mesh usage among surgeons is backed by the multiple studies that support its functionality as a tool for improving surgical outcomes. However,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kallick, Ethan, Nistico, Laura, Longwell, Mark, Byers, Barbara, Cartieri, Frank, Kreft, Rachael, Edington, Howard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6436333/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31001340
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/1063643
_version_ 1783406798572617728
author Kallick, Ethan
Nistico, Laura
Longwell, Mark
Byers, Barbara
Cartieri, Frank
Kreft, Rachael
Edington, Howard
author_facet Kallick, Ethan
Nistico, Laura
Longwell, Mark
Byers, Barbara
Cartieri, Frank
Kreft, Rachael
Edington, Howard
author_sort Kallick, Ethan
collection PubMed
description Surgical meshes have become the standard procedure for a variety of surgical applications with 20 million meshes being implanted each year. The popularity of mesh usage among surgeons is backed by the multiple studies that support its functionality as a tool for improving surgical outcomes. However, their use has also been associated with infectious surgical complications and many surgeons have turned to biologic meshes. While there have been several studies investigating synthetic meshes, there is limited data comparing synthetic and biologic meshes in vitro in an infection model. This study evaluates the in vitro susceptibility of both synthetic and biologic meshes to single-species methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) biofilms. This research compares biofilm biomass, average thickness, and coverage between the three meshes through florescent in situ hybridization (FISH), confocal scanning microscopy (CSLM), and image analysis. We also report the varying levels of planktonic and attached bacteria through sonication and cfu counts. While the data illustrates increased biofilm formation on biologic mesh in vitro, the study must further be investigated in vivo to confirm the study observations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6436333
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64363332019-04-18 Resistance of Synthetic and Biologic Surgical Meshes to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm: An In Vitro Investigation Kallick, Ethan Nistico, Laura Longwell, Mark Byers, Barbara Cartieri, Frank Kreft, Rachael Edington, Howard Int J Biomater Research Article Surgical meshes have become the standard procedure for a variety of surgical applications with 20 million meshes being implanted each year. The popularity of mesh usage among surgeons is backed by the multiple studies that support its functionality as a tool for improving surgical outcomes. However, their use has also been associated with infectious surgical complications and many surgeons have turned to biologic meshes. While there have been several studies investigating synthetic meshes, there is limited data comparing synthetic and biologic meshes in vitro in an infection model. This study evaluates the in vitro susceptibility of both synthetic and biologic meshes to single-species methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) biofilms. This research compares biofilm biomass, average thickness, and coverage between the three meshes through florescent in situ hybridization (FISH), confocal scanning microscopy (CSLM), and image analysis. We also report the varying levels of planktonic and attached bacteria through sonication and cfu counts. While the data illustrates increased biofilm formation on biologic mesh in vitro, the study must further be investigated in vivo to confirm the study observations. Hindawi 2019-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6436333/ /pubmed/31001340 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/1063643 Text en Copyright © 2019 Ethan Kallick et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kallick, Ethan
Nistico, Laura
Longwell, Mark
Byers, Barbara
Cartieri, Frank
Kreft, Rachael
Edington, Howard
Resistance of Synthetic and Biologic Surgical Meshes to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm: An In Vitro Investigation
title Resistance of Synthetic and Biologic Surgical Meshes to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm: An In Vitro Investigation
title_full Resistance of Synthetic and Biologic Surgical Meshes to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm: An In Vitro Investigation
title_fullStr Resistance of Synthetic and Biologic Surgical Meshes to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm: An In Vitro Investigation
title_full_unstemmed Resistance of Synthetic and Biologic Surgical Meshes to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm: An In Vitro Investigation
title_short Resistance of Synthetic and Biologic Surgical Meshes to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm: An In Vitro Investigation
title_sort resistance of synthetic and biologic surgical meshes to methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus biofilm: an in vitro investigation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6436333/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31001340
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/1063643
work_keys_str_mv AT kallickethan resistanceofsyntheticandbiologicsurgicalmeshestomethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbiofilmaninvitroinvestigation
AT nisticolaura resistanceofsyntheticandbiologicsurgicalmeshestomethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbiofilmaninvitroinvestigation
AT longwellmark resistanceofsyntheticandbiologicsurgicalmeshestomethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbiofilmaninvitroinvestigation
AT byersbarbara resistanceofsyntheticandbiologicsurgicalmeshestomethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbiofilmaninvitroinvestigation
AT cartierifrank resistanceofsyntheticandbiologicsurgicalmeshestomethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbiofilmaninvitroinvestigation
AT kreftrachael resistanceofsyntheticandbiologicsurgicalmeshestomethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbiofilmaninvitroinvestigation
AT edingtonhoward resistanceofsyntheticandbiologicsurgicalmeshestomethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbiofilmaninvitroinvestigation