Cargando…
Resistance of Synthetic and Biologic Surgical Meshes to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm: An In Vitro Investigation
Surgical meshes have become the standard procedure for a variety of surgical applications with 20 million meshes being implanted each year. The popularity of mesh usage among surgeons is backed by the multiple studies that support its functionality as a tool for improving surgical outcomes. However,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6436333/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31001340 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/1063643 |
_version_ | 1783406798572617728 |
---|---|
author | Kallick, Ethan Nistico, Laura Longwell, Mark Byers, Barbara Cartieri, Frank Kreft, Rachael Edington, Howard |
author_facet | Kallick, Ethan Nistico, Laura Longwell, Mark Byers, Barbara Cartieri, Frank Kreft, Rachael Edington, Howard |
author_sort | Kallick, Ethan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Surgical meshes have become the standard procedure for a variety of surgical applications with 20 million meshes being implanted each year. The popularity of mesh usage among surgeons is backed by the multiple studies that support its functionality as a tool for improving surgical outcomes. However, their use has also been associated with infectious surgical complications and many surgeons have turned to biologic meshes. While there have been several studies investigating synthetic meshes, there is limited data comparing synthetic and biologic meshes in vitro in an infection model. This study evaluates the in vitro susceptibility of both synthetic and biologic meshes to single-species methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) biofilms. This research compares biofilm biomass, average thickness, and coverage between the three meshes through florescent in situ hybridization (FISH), confocal scanning microscopy (CSLM), and image analysis. We also report the varying levels of planktonic and attached bacteria through sonication and cfu counts. While the data illustrates increased biofilm formation on biologic mesh in vitro, the study must further be investigated in vivo to confirm the study observations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6436333 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64363332019-04-18 Resistance of Synthetic and Biologic Surgical Meshes to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm: An In Vitro Investigation Kallick, Ethan Nistico, Laura Longwell, Mark Byers, Barbara Cartieri, Frank Kreft, Rachael Edington, Howard Int J Biomater Research Article Surgical meshes have become the standard procedure for a variety of surgical applications with 20 million meshes being implanted each year. The popularity of mesh usage among surgeons is backed by the multiple studies that support its functionality as a tool for improving surgical outcomes. However, their use has also been associated with infectious surgical complications and many surgeons have turned to biologic meshes. While there have been several studies investigating synthetic meshes, there is limited data comparing synthetic and biologic meshes in vitro in an infection model. This study evaluates the in vitro susceptibility of both synthetic and biologic meshes to single-species methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) biofilms. This research compares biofilm biomass, average thickness, and coverage between the three meshes through florescent in situ hybridization (FISH), confocal scanning microscopy (CSLM), and image analysis. We also report the varying levels of planktonic and attached bacteria through sonication and cfu counts. While the data illustrates increased biofilm formation on biologic mesh in vitro, the study must further be investigated in vivo to confirm the study observations. Hindawi 2019-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6436333/ /pubmed/31001340 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/1063643 Text en Copyright © 2019 Ethan Kallick et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kallick, Ethan Nistico, Laura Longwell, Mark Byers, Barbara Cartieri, Frank Kreft, Rachael Edington, Howard Resistance of Synthetic and Biologic Surgical Meshes to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm: An In Vitro Investigation |
title | Resistance of Synthetic and Biologic Surgical Meshes to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm: An In Vitro Investigation |
title_full | Resistance of Synthetic and Biologic Surgical Meshes to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm: An In Vitro Investigation |
title_fullStr | Resistance of Synthetic and Biologic Surgical Meshes to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm: An In Vitro Investigation |
title_full_unstemmed | Resistance of Synthetic and Biologic Surgical Meshes to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm: An In Vitro Investigation |
title_short | Resistance of Synthetic and Biologic Surgical Meshes to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm: An In Vitro Investigation |
title_sort | resistance of synthetic and biologic surgical meshes to methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus biofilm: an in vitro investigation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6436333/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31001340 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/1063643 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kallickethan resistanceofsyntheticandbiologicsurgicalmeshestomethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbiofilmaninvitroinvestigation AT nisticolaura resistanceofsyntheticandbiologicsurgicalmeshestomethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbiofilmaninvitroinvestigation AT longwellmark resistanceofsyntheticandbiologicsurgicalmeshestomethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbiofilmaninvitroinvestigation AT byersbarbara resistanceofsyntheticandbiologicsurgicalmeshestomethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbiofilmaninvitroinvestigation AT cartierifrank resistanceofsyntheticandbiologicsurgicalmeshestomethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbiofilmaninvitroinvestigation AT kreftrachael resistanceofsyntheticandbiologicsurgicalmeshestomethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbiofilmaninvitroinvestigation AT edingtonhoward resistanceofsyntheticandbiologicsurgicalmeshestomethicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusbiofilmaninvitroinvestigation |