Cargando…
Evaluation of sperm DNA fragmentation using multiple methods: a comparison of their predictive power for male infertility
OBJECTIVE: The usual seminal profile has been customarily used for diagnosing male infertility based on an examination of semen samples. However, sperm DNA fragmentation has also been causally linked to reproductive failure, suggesting that it should be evaluated as part of male infertility assessme...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Society for Reproductive Medicine
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6436467/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30827073 http://dx.doi.org/10.5653/cerm.2019.46.1.14 |
_version_ | 1783406820307501056 |
---|---|
author | Javed, Aamir Talkad, Muralidhar Srinivasaih Ramaiah, Manjula Kannasandra |
author_facet | Javed, Aamir Talkad, Muralidhar Srinivasaih Ramaiah, Manjula Kannasandra |
author_sort | Javed, Aamir |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The usual seminal profile has been customarily used for diagnosing male infertility based on an examination of semen samples. However, sperm DNA fragmentation has also been causally linked to reproductive failure, suggesting that it should be evaluated as part of male infertility assessments. To compare the ability of the five most widely utilized methodologies of measuring DNA fragmentation to predict male infertility and reactive oxygen species by Oxisperm kit assay. METHODS: In this case-control study, which received ethical committee approval, the participants were divided into fertile and infertile groups (50 patients in each group). RESULTS: The alkaline comet test showed the best ability to predict male infertility, followed by the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labelling (TUNEL) assay, the sperm chromatin dispersion (SCD) test, and the sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA), while the neutral comet test had no predictive power. For our patient population, the projected cut-off point for the DNA fragmentation index was 22.08% using the TUNEL assay, 19.90% using SCSA, 24.74% using the SCD test, 48.47% using the alkaline comet test, and 36.37% using the neutral comet test. Significant correlations were found between the results of the SCD test and those obtained using SCSA and TUNEL (r =0.70 and r =0.68, respectively; p<0.001), and a statistically significant correlation was also found between the results of SCSA and the TUNEL assay (r =0.77, p<0.001). Likewise, the results of the alkaline comet test showed significant correlations with those of the SCD, SCSA, and TUNEL tests (r =0.59, r =0.57, and r =0.72, respectively; p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The TUNEL assay, SCSA, SCD, and the alkaline comet test were effective for distinguishing between fertile and infertile patients, and the alkaline comet test was the best predictor of male infertility. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6436467 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Korean Society for Reproductive Medicine |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64364672019-04-03 Evaluation of sperm DNA fragmentation using multiple methods: a comparison of their predictive power for male infertility Javed, Aamir Talkad, Muralidhar Srinivasaih Ramaiah, Manjula Kannasandra Clin Exp Reprod Med Original Article OBJECTIVE: The usual seminal profile has been customarily used for diagnosing male infertility based on an examination of semen samples. However, sperm DNA fragmentation has also been causally linked to reproductive failure, suggesting that it should be evaluated as part of male infertility assessments. To compare the ability of the five most widely utilized methodologies of measuring DNA fragmentation to predict male infertility and reactive oxygen species by Oxisperm kit assay. METHODS: In this case-control study, which received ethical committee approval, the participants were divided into fertile and infertile groups (50 patients in each group). RESULTS: The alkaline comet test showed the best ability to predict male infertility, followed by the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labelling (TUNEL) assay, the sperm chromatin dispersion (SCD) test, and the sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA), while the neutral comet test had no predictive power. For our patient population, the projected cut-off point for the DNA fragmentation index was 22.08% using the TUNEL assay, 19.90% using SCSA, 24.74% using the SCD test, 48.47% using the alkaline comet test, and 36.37% using the neutral comet test. Significant correlations were found between the results of the SCD test and those obtained using SCSA and TUNEL (r =0.70 and r =0.68, respectively; p<0.001), and a statistically significant correlation was also found between the results of SCSA and the TUNEL assay (r =0.77, p<0.001). Likewise, the results of the alkaline comet test showed significant correlations with those of the SCD, SCSA, and TUNEL tests (r =0.59, r =0.57, and r =0.72, respectively; p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The TUNEL assay, SCSA, SCD, and the alkaline comet test were effective for distinguishing between fertile and infertile patients, and the alkaline comet test was the best predictor of male infertility. Korean Society for Reproductive Medicine 2019-03 2019-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6436467/ /pubmed/30827073 http://dx.doi.org/10.5653/cerm.2019.46.1.14 Text en Copyright © 2019. THE KOREAN SOCIETY FOR REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Javed, Aamir Talkad, Muralidhar Srinivasaih Ramaiah, Manjula Kannasandra Evaluation of sperm DNA fragmentation using multiple methods: a comparison of their predictive power for male infertility |
title | Evaluation of sperm DNA fragmentation using multiple methods: a comparison of their predictive power for male infertility |
title_full | Evaluation of sperm DNA fragmentation using multiple methods: a comparison of their predictive power for male infertility |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of sperm DNA fragmentation using multiple methods: a comparison of their predictive power for male infertility |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of sperm DNA fragmentation using multiple methods: a comparison of their predictive power for male infertility |
title_short | Evaluation of sperm DNA fragmentation using multiple methods: a comparison of their predictive power for male infertility |
title_sort | evaluation of sperm dna fragmentation using multiple methods: a comparison of their predictive power for male infertility |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6436467/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30827073 http://dx.doi.org/10.5653/cerm.2019.46.1.14 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT javedaamir evaluationofspermdnafragmentationusingmultiplemethodsacomparisonoftheirpredictivepowerformaleinfertility AT talkadmuralidharsrinivasaih evaluationofspermdnafragmentationusingmultiplemethodsacomparisonoftheirpredictivepowerformaleinfertility AT ramaiahmanjulakannasandra evaluationofspermdnafragmentationusingmultiplemethodsacomparisonoftheirpredictivepowerformaleinfertility |