Cargando…
Does bilateral uterine artery ligation have negative effects on ovarian reserve markers and ovarian artery blood flow in women with postpartum hemorrhage?
OBJECTIVE: Bilateral uterine artery ligation (UAL) is a fertility-preserving procedure used in women experiencing postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). However, the long-term effects of this procedure on ovarian function remain unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate whether bilateral UAL compromis...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Society for Reproductive Medicine
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6436468/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30827075 http://dx.doi.org/10.5653/cerm.2019.46.1.30 |
_version_ | 1783406820544479232 |
---|---|
author | Verit, Fatma Ferda Çetin, Orkun Keskin, Seda Akyol, Hürkan Zebitay, Ali Galip |
author_facet | Verit, Fatma Ferda Çetin, Orkun Keskin, Seda Akyol, Hürkan Zebitay, Ali Galip |
author_sort | Verit, Fatma Ferda |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Bilateral uterine artery ligation (UAL) is a fertility-preserving procedure used in women experiencing postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). However, the long-term effects of this procedure on ovarian function remain unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate whether bilateral UAL compromised ovarian reserve and ovarian blood supply. METHODS: This prospective study included 49 women aged between 21 and 36 years who had undergone a cesarean section for obstetric indications. Of these, 25 underwent uterine bilateral UAL to control intractable atonic PPH. The control group consisted of 24 women who had not undergone bilateral UAL. Standard clinical parameters, the results of color Doppler screening, and ovarian reserve markers were assessed in all participants at 6 months after surgery. The clinical parameters included age, parity, cycle history, body mass index, and previous medication and/or surgery. Color Doppler screening findings included the pulsatility index (PI) and resistance index (RI) for both the uterine and ovarian arteries. The ovarian reserve markers included day 3 follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels, antral follicle count, and anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the ovarian reserve markers of day 3 FSH levels, antral follicle count, and AMH levels between the study and control groups (p>0.05 for all). In addition, no significant differences were observed in the PI and RI indices of the uterine and ovarian arteries (p>0.05 for all). CONCLUSION: In this study, we showed that bilateral UAL had no negative effects on ovarian reserve or ovarian blood supply, so this treatment should be used as a fertility preservation technique to avoid hysterectomy in patients experiencing PPH. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6436468 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Korean Society for Reproductive Medicine |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64364682019-04-03 Does bilateral uterine artery ligation have negative effects on ovarian reserve markers and ovarian artery blood flow in women with postpartum hemorrhage? Verit, Fatma Ferda Çetin, Orkun Keskin, Seda Akyol, Hürkan Zebitay, Ali Galip Clin Exp Reprod Med Original Article OBJECTIVE: Bilateral uterine artery ligation (UAL) is a fertility-preserving procedure used in women experiencing postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). However, the long-term effects of this procedure on ovarian function remain unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate whether bilateral UAL compromised ovarian reserve and ovarian blood supply. METHODS: This prospective study included 49 women aged between 21 and 36 years who had undergone a cesarean section for obstetric indications. Of these, 25 underwent uterine bilateral UAL to control intractable atonic PPH. The control group consisted of 24 women who had not undergone bilateral UAL. Standard clinical parameters, the results of color Doppler screening, and ovarian reserve markers were assessed in all participants at 6 months after surgery. The clinical parameters included age, parity, cycle history, body mass index, and previous medication and/or surgery. Color Doppler screening findings included the pulsatility index (PI) and resistance index (RI) for both the uterine and ovarian arteries. The ovarian reserve markers included day 3 follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels, antral follicle count, and anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the ovarian reserve markers of day 3 FSH levels, antral follicle count, and AMH levels between the study and control groups (p>0.05 for all). In addition, no significant differences were observed in the PI and RI indices of the uterine and ovarian arteries (p>0.05 for all). CONCLUSION: In this study, we showed that bilateral UAL had no negative effects on ovarian reserve or ovarian blood supply, so this treatment should be used as a fertility preservation technique to avoid hysterectomy in patients experiencing PPH. Korean Society for Reproductive Medicine 2019-03 2019-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6436468/ /pubmed/30827075 http://dx.doi.org/10.5653/cerm.2019.46.1.30 Text en Copyright © 2019. THE KOREAN SOCIETY FOR REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Verit, Fatma Ferda Çetin, Orkun Keskin, Seda Akyol, Hürkan Zebitay, Ali Galip Does bilateral uterine artery ligation have negative effects on ovarian reserve markers and ovarian artery blood flow in women with postpartum hemorrhage? |
title | Does bilateral uterine artery ligation have negative effects on ovarian reserve markers and ovarian artery blood flow in women with postpartum hemorrhage? |
title_full | Does bilateral uterine artery ligation have negative effects on ovarian reserve markers and ovarian artery blood flow in women with postpartum hemorrhage? |
title_fullStr | Does bilateral uterine artery ligation have negative effects on ovarian reserve markers and ovarian artery blood flow in women with postpartum hemorrhage? |
title_full_unstemmed | Does bilateral uterine artery ligation have negative effects on ovarian reserve markers and ovarian artery blood flow in women with postpartum hemorrhage? |
title_short | Does bilateral uterine artery ligation have negative effects on ovarian reserve markers and ovarian artery blood flow in women with postpartum hemorrhage? |
title_sort | does bilateral uterine artery ligation have negative effects on ovarian reserve markers and ovarian artery blood flow in women with postpartum hemorrhage? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6436468/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30827075 http://dx.doi.org/10.5653/cerm.2019.46.1.30 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT veritfatmaferda doesbilateraluterinearteryligationhavenegativeeffectsonovarianreservemarkersandovarianarterybloodflowinwomenwithpostpartumhemorrhage AT cetinorkun doesbilateraluterinearteryligationhavenegativeeffectsonovarianreservemarkersandovarianarterybloodflowinwomenwithpostpartumhemorrhage AT keskinseda doesbilateraluterinearteryligationhavenegativeeffectsonovarianreservemarkersandovarianarterybloodflowinwomenwithpostpartumhemorrhage AT akyolhurkan doesbilateraluterinearteryligationhavenegativeeffectsonovarianreservemarkersandovarianarterybloodflowinwomenwithpostpartumhemorrhage AT zebitayaligalip doesbilateraluterinearteryligationhavenegativeeffectsonovarianreservemarkersandovarianarterybloodflowinwomenwithpostpartumhemorrhage |