Cargando…

Mechanical Work and Physiological Responses to Simulated Flat Water Slalom Kayaking

The purpose of this study was to assess the physical work demand in relation to metrics of force and subsequent physiological response to a simulated flatwater slalom competition. Eight New Zealand team members completed a standard incremental step-test to ascertain power:oxygen consumption relation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Macdermid, Paul W., Osborne, Aaron, Stannard, Stephen R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6436605/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30949065
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.00260
_version_ 1783406832706912256
author Macdermid, Paul W.
Osborne, Aaron
Stannard, Stephen R.
author_facet Macdermid, Paul W.
Osborne, Aaron
Stannard, Stephen R.
author_sort Macdermid, Paul W.
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to assess the physical work demand in relation to metrics of force and subsequent physiological response to a simulated flatwater slalom competition. Eight New Zealand team members completed a standard incremental step-test to ascertain power:oxygen consumption relationship. This was followed by a simulated race run where breath-by-breath analysis along with force and power data logged at 50 Hz to determine stroke length, impulse, peak force, time to peak force, and rate of peak force per stroke. Physiological response to negotiating a flatwater slalom course was greater than straight-line paddling (36.89 ± 2.01 vs. 32.17 ± 1.97 ml⋅kg(-1)⋅min(-1), p = 0.0065) at the same power output. Mean power output for the duration of the simulated race (91.63 ± 7.19 s) was 203.8 ± 45.0 W, incurring an oxygen deficit of 1.386 ± 0.541 L⋅min(-1) translating to an overall anaerobic contribution of 32 ± 18% and aerobic contribution of 68 ± 18%. Moderate to strong relationships between time duration and stroke peak force (R(2) = 0.354, R(2) = 0.485) and rate of peak force development (R(2) = 0.345, R(2) = 0.426) but not for stroke length (R(2) = 0.022, R(2) = 0.012), impulse (R(2) = 0.088, R(2) = 0.097) or time to peak force (R(2) = 0.001, R(2) = 0.0001) for left and right strokes, respectively. The number of propulsive (<0.6 s) strokes outweighed turning/driving (>0.6 s) strokes with a ratio of 94:6%. Longer stroke duration was significantly correlated to greater impulse (R(2) = 0.507, p < 0.0001) and time to peak force (R(2) = 0.851, p < 0.0001), but a lower rate of force development (R(2) = 0.107, p < 0.0001). The results show that a flatwater slalom under simulated race conditions entails initial supra-maximal (anaerobic) work rate with a subsequent transition to one associated with maximal aerobic capacity. Inability to sustain work done and the subsequent decline in peak force and force profile per stroke requires further research regarding strategies to enhance performance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6436605
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64366052019-04-04 Mechanical Work and Physiological Responses to Simulated Flat Water Slalom Kayaking Macdermid, Paul W. Osborne, Aaron Stannard, Stephen R. Front Physiol Physiology The purpose of this study was to assess the physical work demand in relation to metrics of force and subsequent physiological response to a simulated flatwater slalom competition. Eight New Zealand team members completed a standard incremental step-test to ascertain power:oxygen consumption relationship. This was followed by a simulated race run where breath-by-breath analysis along with force and power data logged at 50 Hz to determine stroke length, impulse, peak force, time to peak force, and rate of peak force per stroke. Physiological response to negotiating a flatwater slalom course was greater than straight-line paddling (36.89 ± 2.01 vs. 32.17 ± 1.97 ml⋅kg(-1)⋅min(-1), p = 0.0065) at the same power output. Mean power output for the duration of the simulated race (91.63 ± 7.19 s) was 203.8 ± 45.0 W, incurring an oxygen deficit of 1.386 ± 0.541 L⋅min(-1) translating to an overall anaerobic contribution of 32 ± 18% and aerobic contribution of 68 ± 18%. Moderate to strong relationships between time duration and stroke peak force (R(2) = 0.354, R(2) = 0.485) and rate of peak force development (R(2) = 0.345, R(2) = 0.426) but not for stroke length (R(2) = 0.022, R(2) = 0.012), impulse (R(2) = 0.088, R(2) = 0.097) or time to peak force (R(2) = 0.001, R(2) = 0.0001) for left and right strokes, respectively. The number of propulsive (<0.6 s) strokes outweighed turning/driving (>0.6 s) strokes with a ratio of 94:6%. Longer stroke duration was significantly correlated to greater impulse (R(2) = 0.507, p < 0.0001) and time to peak force (R(2) = 0.851, p < 0.0001), but a lower rate of force development (R(2) = 0.107, p < 0.0001). The results show that a flatwater slalom under simulated race conditions entails initial supra-maximal (anaerobic) work rate with a subsequent transition to one associated with maximal aerobic capacity. Inability to sustain work done and the subsequent decline in peak force and force profile per stroke requires further research regarding strategies to enhance performance. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6436605/ /pubmed/30949065 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.00260 Text en Copyright © 2019 Macdermid, Osborne and Stannard. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Macdermid, Paul W.
Osborne, Aaron
Stannard, Stephen R.
Mechanical Work and Physiological Responses to Simulated Flat Water Slalom Kayaking
title Mechanical Work and Physiological Responses to Simulated Flat Water Slalom Kayaking
title_full Mechanical Work and Physiological Responses to Simulated Flat Water Slalom Kayaking
title_fullStr Mechanical Work and Physiological Responses to Simulated Flat Water Slalom Kayaking
title_full_unstemmed Mechanical Work and Physiological Responses to Simulated Flat Water Slalom Kayaking
title_short Mechanical Work and Physiological Responses to Simulated Flat Water Slalom Kayaking
title_sort mechanical work and physiological responses to simulated flat water slalom kayaking
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6436605/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30949065
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.00260
work_keys_str_mv AT macdermidpaulw mechanicalworkandphysiologicalresponsestosimulatedflatwaterslalomkayaking
AT osborneaaron mechanicalworkandphysiologicalresponsestosimulatedflatwaterslalomkayaking
AT stannardstephenr mechanicalworkandphysiologicalresponsestosimulatedflatwaterslalomkayaking