Cargando…
The effectiveness of ICSI versus conventional IVF in couples with non-male factor infertility: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
STUDY QUESTIONS: Does ICSI result in a higher live birth rate as compared with conventional IVF in couples with non-male factor infertility? WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: ICSI is primarily indicated for severe male factor infertility. While the use of ICSI for couples with non-male factor infertility has b...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6436611/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30937394 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoz006 |
_version_ | 1783406834107809792 |
---|---|
author | Dang, V Q Vuong, L N Ho, T M Ha, A N Nguyen, Q N Truong, B T Pham, Q T Wang, R Norman, R J Mol, B W |
author_facet | Dang, V Q Vuong, L N Ho, T M Ha, A N Nguyen, Q N Truong, B T Pham, Q T Wang, R Norman, R J Mol, B W |
author_sort | Dang, V Q |
collection | PubMed |
description | STUDY QUESTIONS: Does ICSI result in a higher live birth rate as compared with conventional IVF in couples with non-male factor infertility? WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: ICSI is primarily indicated for severe male factor infertility. While the use of ICSI for couples with non-male factor infertility has been increasing worldwide, this is not supported by data from randomised controlled trials. Evidence from non-randomised studies suggest no benefit from ICSI compared with conventional IVF in non-male factor infertility, if not a harm. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This randomised, open-label, multi-centre trial aims to compare the effectiveness of one ICSI cycle and one conventional IVF cycle in infertile couples with non-male factor infertility. A total of 1064 couples will be randomly allocated to an ICSI group and a conventional IVF group. The estimated duration of the study is 30 months. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Eligible couples are those whose husbands’ total sperm count and motility are normal, have undergone ≤2 previous IVF/ICSI attempts, use antagonist protocol for ovarian stimulation, agree to have ≤2 embryos transferred and are not participating in another IVF study at the same time. Women undergoing IVM cycles, using frozen semen or having a poor fertilisation (≤25%) in previous cycle will not be eligible. Couples will be randomised to undergo ICSI or conventional IVF (1:1) with ongoing pregnancy resulting in live birth after the first embryo transfer of the started treatment cycle as the primary endpoint. All analyses will be conducted on an intention-to-treat basis. Effect sizes will be summarised as relative risk (RR), with precision evaluated by 95% CIs. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): All authors declare having no conflict of interests with regards to this trial. This work was supported by a grant from MSD [MISP #57508]. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03428919. TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE: 8 February 2018. DATE OF FIRST PATIENT’S ENROLMENT: 16 March 2018. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6436611 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64366112019-04-01 The effectiveness of ICSI versus conventional IVF in couples with non-male factor infertility: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial Dang, V Q Vuong, L N Ho, T M Ha, A N Nguyen, Q N Truong, B T Pham, Q T Wang, R Norman, R J Mol, B W Hum Reprod Open Protocol STUDY QUESTIONS: Does ICSI result in a higher live birth rate as compared with conventional IVF in couples with non-male factor infertility? WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: ICSI is primarily indicated for severe male factor infertility. While the use of ICSI for couples with non-male factor infertility has been increasing worldwide, this is not supported by data from randomised controlled trials. Evidence from non-randomised studies suggest no benefit from ICSI compared with conventional IVF in non-male factor infertility, if not a harm. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This randomised, open-label, multi-centre trial aims to compare the effectiveness of one ICSI cycle and one conventional IVF cycle in infertile couples with non-male factor infertility. A total of 1064 couples will be randomly allocated to an ICSI group and a conventional IVF group. The estimated duration of the study is 30 months. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Eligible couples are those whose husbands’ total sperm count and motility are normal, have undergone ≤2 previous IVF/ICSI attempts, use antagonist protocol for ovarian stimulation, agree to have ≤2 embryos transferred and are not participating in another IVF study at the same time. Women undergoing IVM cycles, using frozen semen or having a poor fertilisation (≤25%) in previous cycle will not be eligible. Couples will be randomised to undergo ICSI or conventional IVF (1:1) with ongoing pregnancy resulting in live birth after the first embryo transfer of the started treatment cycle as the primary endpoint. All analyses will be conducted on an intention-to-treat basis. Effect sizes will be summarised as relative risk (RR), with precision evaluated by 95% CIs. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): All authors declare having no conflict of interests with regards to this trial. This work was supported by a grant from MSD [MISP #57508]. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03428919. TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE: 8 February 2018. DATE OF FIRST PATIENT’S ENROLMENT: 16 March 2018. Oxford University Press 2019-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6436611/ /pubmed/30937394 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoz006 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Protocol Dang, V Q Vuong, L N Ho, T M Ha, A N Nguyen, Q N Truong, B T Pham, Q T Wang, R Norman, R J Mol, B W The effectiveness of ICSI versus conventional IVF in couples with non-male factor infertility: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title | The effectiveness of ICSI versus conventional IVF in couples with non-male factor infertility: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_full | The effectiveness of ICSI versus conventional IVF in couples with non-male factor infertility: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | The effectiveness of ICSI versus conventional IVF in couples with non-male factor infertility: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | The effectiveness of ICSI versus conventional IVF in couples with non-male factor infertility: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_short | The effectiveness of ICSI versus conventional IVF in couples with non-male factor infertility: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | effectiveness of icsi versus conventional ivf in couples with non-male factor infertility: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial |
topic | Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6436611/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30937394 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoz006 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dangvq theeffectivenessoficsiversusconventionalivfincoupleswithnonmalefactorinfertilitystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT vuongln theeffectivenessoficsiversusconventionalivfincoupleswithnonmalefactorinfertilitystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT hotm theeffectivenessoficsiversusconventionalivfincoupleswithnonmalefactorinfertilitystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT haan theeffectivenessoficsiversusconventionalivfincoupleswithnonmalefactorinfertilitystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT nguyenqn theeffectivenessoficsiversusconventionalivfincoupleswithnonmalefactorinfertilitystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT truongbt theeffectivenessoficsiversusconventionalivfincoupleswithnonmalefactorinfertilitystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT phamqt theeffectivenessoficsiversusconventionalivfincoupleswithnonmalefactorinfertilitystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT wangr theeffectivenessoficsiversusconventionalivfincoupleswithnonmalefactorinfertilitystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT normanrj theeffectivenessoficsiversusconventionalivfincoupleswithnonmalefactorinfertilitystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT molbw theeffectivenessoficsiversusconventionalivfincoupleswithnonmalefactorinfertilitystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT dangvq effectivenessoficsiversusconventionalivfincoupleswithnonmalefactorinfertilitystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT vuongln effectivenessoficsiversusconventionalivfincoupleswithnonmalefactorinfertilitystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT hotm effectivenessoficsiversusconventionalivfincoupleswithnonmalefactorinfertilitystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT haan effectivenessoficsiversusconventionalivfincoupleswithnonmalefactorinfertilitystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT nguyenqn effectivenessoficsiversusconventionalivfincoupleswithnonmalefactorinfertilitystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT truongbt effectivenessoficsiversusconventionalivfincoupleswithnonmalefactorinfertilitystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT phamqt effectivenessoficsiversusconventionalivfincoupleswithnonmalefactorinfertilitystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT wangr effectivenessoficsiversusconventionalivfincoupleswithnonmalefactorinfertilitystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT normanrj effectivenessoficsiversusconventionalivfincoupleswithnonmalefactorinfertilitystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT molbw effectivenessoficsiversusconventionalivfincoupleswithnonmalefactorinfertilitystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial |