Cargando…

The effectiveness of ICSI versus conventional IVF in couples with non-male factor infertility: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

STUDY QUESTIONS: Does ICSI result in a higher live birth rate as compared with conventional IVF in couples with non-male factor infertility? WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: ICSI is primarily indicated for severe male factor infertility. While the use of ICSI for couples with non-male factor infertility has b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dang, V Q, Vuong, L N, Ho, T M, Ha, A N, Nguyen, Q N, Truong, B T, Pham, Q T, Wang, R, Norman, R J, Mol, B W
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6436611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30937394
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoz006
_version_ 1783406834107809792
author Dang, V Q
Vuong, L N
Ho, T M
Ha, A N
Nguyen, Q N
Truong, B T
Pham, Q T
Wang, R
Norman, R J
Mol, B W
author_facet Dang, V Q
Vuong, L N
Ho, T M
Ha, A N
Nguyen, Q N
Truong, B T
Pham, Q T
Wang, R
Norman, R J
Mol, B W
author_sort Dang, V Q
collection PubMed
description STUDY QUESTIONS: Does ICSI result in a higher live birth rate as compared with conventional IVF in couples with non-male factor infertility? WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: ICSI is primarily indicated for severe male factor infertility. While the use of ICSI for couples with non-male factor infertility has been increasing worldwide, this is not supported by data from randomised controlled trials. Evidence from non-randomised studies suggest no benefit from ICSI compared with conventional IVF in non-male factor infertility, if not a harm. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This randomised, open-label, multi-centre trial aims to compare the effectiveness of one ICSI cycle and one conventional IVF cycle in infertile couples with non-male factor infertility. A total of 1064 couples will be randomly allocated to an ICSI group and a conventional IVF group. The estimated duration of the study is 30 months. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Eligible couples are those whose husbands’ total sperm count and motility are normal, have undergone ≤2 previous IVF/ICSI attempts, use antagonist protocol for ovarian stimulation, agree to have ≤2 embryos transferred and are not participating in another IVF study at the same time. Women undergoing IVM cycles, using frozen semen or having a poor fertilisation (≤25%) in previous cycle will not be eligible. Couples will be randomised to undergo ICSI or conventional IVF (1:1) with ongoing pregnancy resulting in live birth after the first embryo transfer of the started treatment cycle as the primary endpoint. All analyses will be conducted on an intention-to-treat basis. Effect sizes will be summarised as relative risk (RR), with precision evaluated by 95% CIs. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): All authors declare having no conflict of interests with regards to this trial. This work was supported by a grant from MSD [MISP #57508]. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03428919. TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE: 8 February 2018. DATE OF FIRST PATIENT’S ENROLMENT: 16 March 2018.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6436611
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64366112019-04-01 The effectiveness of ICSI versus conventional IVF in couples with non-male factor infertility: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial Dang, V Q Vuong, L N Ho, T M Ha, A N Nguyen, Q N Truong, B T Pham, Q T Wang, R Norman, R J Mol, B W Hum Reprod Open Protocol STUDY QUESTIONS: Does ICSI result in a higher live birth rate as compared with conventional IVF in couples with non-male factor infertility? WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: ICSI is primarily indicated for severe male factor infertility. While the use of ICSI for couples with non-male factor infertility has been increasing worldwide, this is not supported by data from randomised controlled trials. Evidence from non-randomised studies suggest no benefit from ICSI compared with conventional IVF in non-male factor infertility, if not a harm. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This randomised, open-label, multi-centre trial aims to compare the effectiveness of one ICSI cycle and one conventional IVF cycle in infertile couples with non-male factor infertility. A total of 1064 couples will be randomly allocated to an ICSI group and a conventional IVF group. The estimated duration of the study is 30 months. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Eligible couples are those whose husbands’ total sperm count and motility are normal, have undergone ≤2 previous IVF/ICSI attempts, use antagonist protocol for ovarian stimulation, agree to have ≤2 embryos transferred and are not participating in another IVF study at the same time. Women undergoing IVM cycles, using frozen semen or having a poor fertilisation (≤25%) in previous cycle will not be eligible. Couples will be randomised to undergo ICSI or conventional IVF (1:1) with ongoing pregnancy resulting in live birth after the first embryo transfer of the started treatment cycle as the primary endpoint. All analyses will be conducted on an intention-to-treat basis. Effect sizes will be summarised as relative risk (RR), with precision evaluated by 95% CIs. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): All authors declare having no conflict of interests with regards to this trial. This work was supported by a grant from MSD [MISP #57508]. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03428919. TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE: 8 February 2018. DATE OF FIRST PATIENT’S ENROLMENT: 16 March 2018. Oxford University Press 2019-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6436611/ /pubmed/30937394 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoz006 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Protocol
Dang, V Q
Vuong, L N
Ho, T M
Ha, A N
Nguyen, Q N
Truong, B T
Pham, Q T
Wang, R
Norman, R J
Mol, B W
The effectiveness of ICSI versus conventional IVF in couples with non-male factor infertility: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title The effectiveness of ICSI versus conventional IVF in couples with non-male factor infertility: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full The effectiveness of ICSI versus conventional IVF in couples with non-male factor infertility: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr The effectiveness of ICSI versus conventional IVF in couples with non-male factor infertility: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed The effectiveness of ICSI versus conventional IVF in couples with non-male factor infertility: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_short The effectiveness of ICSI versus conventional IVF in couples with non-male factor infertility: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_sort effectiveness of icsi versus conventional ivf in couples with non-male factor infertility: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6436611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30937394
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoz006
work_keys_str_mv AT dangvq theeffectivenessoficsiversusconventionalivfincoupleswithnonmalefactorinfertilitystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT vuongln theeffectivenessoficsiversusconventionalivfincoupleswithnonmalefactorinfertilitystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hotm theeffectivenessoficsiversusconventionalivfincoupleswithnonmalefactorinfertilitystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT haan theeffectivenessoficsiversusconventionalivfincoupleswithnonmalefactorinfertilitystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT nguyenqn theeffectivenessoficsiversusconventionalivfincoupleswithnonmalefactorinfertilitystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT truongbt theeffectivenessoficsiversusconventionalivfincoupleswithnonmalefactorinfertilitystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT phamqt theeffectivenessoficsiversusconventionalivfincoupleswithnonmalefactorinfertilitystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT wangr theeffectivenessoficsiversusconventionalivfincoupleswithnonmalefactorinfertilitystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT normanrj theeffectivenessoficsiversusconventionalivfincoupleswithnonmalefactorinfertilitystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT molbw theeffectivenessoficsiversusconventionalivfincoupleswithnonmalefactorinfertilitystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT dangvq effectivenessoficsiversusconventionalivfincoupleswithnonmalefactorinfertilitystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT vuongln effectivenessoficsiversusconventionalivfincoupleswithnonmalefactorinfertilitystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hotm effectivenessoficsiversusconventionalivfincoupleswithnonmalefactorinfertilitystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT haan effectivenessoficsiversusconventionalivfincoupleswithnonmalefactorinfertilitystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT nguyenqn effectivenessoficsiversusconventionalivfincoupleswithnonmalefactorinfertilitystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT truongbt effectivenessoficsiversusconventionalivfincoupleswithnonmalefactorinfertilitystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT phamqt effectivenessoficsiversusconventionalivfincoupleswithnonmalefactorinfertilitystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT wangr effectivenessoficsiversusconventionalivfincoupleswithnonmalefactorinfertilitystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT normanrj effectivenessoficsiversusconventionalivfincoupleswithnonmalefactorinfertilitystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT molbw effectivenessoficsiversusconventionalivfincoupleswithnonmalefactorinfertilitystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial