Cargando…

Effect of magnification devices on dental students’ visual acuity

This study aimed to determine dental students’ visual acuity and neck angulation when using magnification devices and distances from the operating field. Forty students from each of the second through fifth years of the five-year program at the School of Dentistry of Araraquara were selected (N = 16...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wajngarten, Danielle, Garcia, Patrícia Petromilli Nordi Sasso
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6436677/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30917132
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212793
_version_ 1783406839651631104
author Wajngarten, Danielle
Garcia, Patrícia Petromilli Nordi Sasso
author_facet Wajngarten, Danielle
Garcia, Patrícia Petromilli Nordi Sasso
author_sort Wajngarten, Danielle
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to determine dental students’ visual acuity and neck angulation when using magnification devices and distances from the operating field. Forty students from each of the second through fifth years of the five-year program at the School of Dentistry of Araraquara were selected (N = 160). Visual acuity was tested using a miniature Snellen eye chart under five different settings (naked eye; simple loupe; Galilean loupe; Keplerian loupe and an operating microscope). Photographs were taken during the visual acuity exam in order to evaluate the angulation of the subjects’ necks in a neutral posture. The two-factor analysis of variance and the Games-Howell post-hoc test were performed (α = 0.05). A significant difference in visual acuity and neck angulation was found between the "magnification device" and "distance" factors in each of the graduating classes analyzed (p<0.05). At a standardized distance, the Keplerian loupe (535.93±133.69), the Galilean loupe (514.06±171.56), and the operating microscope (517.71±161.61) all provided greater visual acuity. At a subjectively comfortable distance, the Keplerian (521.35±157.99) and Galilean (515.00±156.32) loupes produced the best visual acuity. The angulation of the neck was greater when the simple loupes (56,59±10,88) and naked eye (56.51±13.55) were used at a subjectively comfortable distance. At both a standardized distance and a comfortable distance, the Galilean and Keplerian magnification systems provided the best visual acuity and the lowest angulation of the operator’s neck. At a standardized distance of 30 cm to 40 cm, the operating microscopes produced similar results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6436677
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64366772019-04-12 Effect of magnification devices on dental students’ visual acuity Wajngarten, Danielle Garcia, Patrícia Petromilli Nordi Sasso PLoS One Research Article This study aimed to determine dental students’ visual acuity and neck angulation when using magnification devices and distances from the operating field. Forty students from each of the second through fifth years of the five-year program at the School of Dentistry of Araraquara were selected (N = 160). Visual acuity was tested using a miniature Snellen eye chart under five different settings (naked eye; simple loupe; Galilean loupe; Keplerian loupe and an operating microscope). Photographs were taken during the visual acuity exam in order to evaluate the angulation of the subjects’ necks in a neutral posture. The two-factor analysis of variance and the Games-Howell post-hoc test were performed (α = 0.05). A significant difference in visual acuity and neck angulation was found between the "magnification device" and "distance" factors in each of the graduating classes analyzed (p<0.05). At a standardized distance, the Keplerian loupe (535.93±133.69), the Galilean loupe (514.06±171.56), and the operating microscope (517.71±161.61) all provided greater visual acuity. At a subjectively comfortable distance, the Keplerian (521.35±157.99) and Galilean (515.00±156.32) loupes produced the best visual acuity. The angulation of the neck was greater when the simple loupes (56,59±10,88) and naked eye (56.51±13.55) were used at a subjectively comfortable distance. At both a standardized distance and a comfortable distance, the Galilean and Keplerian magnification systems provided the best visual acuity and the lowest angulation of the operator’s neck. At a standardized distance of 30 cm to 40 cm, the operating microscopes produced similar results. Public Library of Science 2019-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6436677/ /pubmed/30917132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212793 Text en © 2019 Wajngarten, Garcia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wajngarten, Danielle
Garcia, Patrícia Petromilli Nordi Sasso
Effect of magnification devices on dental students’ visual acuity
title Effect of magnification devices on dental students’ visual acuity
title_full Effect of magnification devices on dental students’ visual acuity
title_fullStr Effect of magnification devices on dental students’ visual acuity
title_full_unstemmed Effect of magnification devices on dental students’ visual acuity
title_short Effect of magnification devices on dental students’ visual acuity
title_sort effect of magnification devices on dental students’ visual acuity
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6436677/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30917132
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212793
work_keys_str_mv AT wajngartendanielle effectofmagnificationdevicesondentalstudentsvisualacuity
AT garciapatriciapetromillinordisasso effectofmagnificationdevicesondentalstudentsvisualacuity