Cargando…

The Learning Exchange, a Community Knowledge Commons for Learning Networks: Qualitative Evaluation to Test Acceptability, Feasibility, and Utility

BACKGROUND: Learning Networks are distributed learning health systems that enable collaboration at scale to improve health and health care. A key requirement for such networks is having a way to create and share information and knowledge in furtherance of the work of the community. OBJECTIVE: We des...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McLinden, Daniel, Myers, Sarah, Seid, Michael, Busch, Melida, Davis, David, Murphy, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6437610/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30869643
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/formative.9858
_version_ 1783406964168982528
author McLinden, Daniel
Myers, Sarah
Seid, Michael
Busch, Melida
Davis, David
Murphy, John
author_facet McLinden, Daniel
Myers, Sarah
Seid, Michael
Busch, Melida
Davis, David
Murphy, John
author_sort McLinden, Daniel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Learning Networks are distributed learning health systems that enable collaboration at scale to improve health and health care. A key requirement for such networks is having a way to create and share information and knowledge in furtherance of the work of the community. OBJECTIVE: We describe a Learning Exchange—a bespoke, scalable knowledge management and exchange platform initially built and tested for improving pediatric inflammatory bowel disease outcomes in the ImproveCareNow (ICN) Network—and assess evidence of its acceptability, feasibility, and utility in facilitating creation and sharing of information in furtherance of the work of the community and as a model for other communities. METHODS: Acceptability was assessed via growth in active users and activity. Feasibility was measured in terms of the percentage of users with a log-in who became active users as well as user surveys and a case study. Utility was measured in terms of the type of work that the Learning Exchange facilitated for the community. RESULTS: The ICNExchange has over 1000 users and supported sharing of resources across all care centers in ICN. Users reported that the Learning Exchange has facilitated their work and resulted in increased ability to find resources relevant to local information needs. CONCLUSIONS: The ICNExchange is acceptable, feasible, and useful as a knowledge management and exchange platform in service of the work of ICN. Experience with the ICNExchange suggests that the design principles are extensible to other chronic care Learning Networks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6437610
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64376102019-04-17 The Learning Exchange, a Community Knowledge Commons for Learning Networks: Qualitative Evaluation to Test Acceptability, Feasibility, and Utility McLinden, Daniel Myers, Sarah Seid, Michael Busch, Melida Davis, David Murphy, John JMIR Form Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Learning Networks are distributed learning health systems that enable collaboration at scale to improve health and health care. A key requirement for such networks is having a way to create and share information and knowledge in furtherance of the work of the community. OBJECTIVE: We describe a Learning Exchange—a bespoke, scalable knowledge management and exchange platform initially built and tested for improving pediatric inflammatory bowel disease outcomes in the ImproveCareNow (ICN) Network—and assess evidence of its acceptability, feasibility, and utility in facilitating creation and sharing of information in furtherance of the work of the community and as a model for other communities. METHODS: Acceptability was assessed via growth in active users and activity. Feasibility was measured in terms of the percentage of users with a log-in who became active users as well as user surveys and a case study. Utility was measured in terms of the type of work that the Learning Exchange facilitated for the community. RESULTS: The ICNExchange has over 1000 users and supported sharing of resources across all care centers in ICN. Users reported that the Learning Exchange has facilitated their work and resulted in increased ability to find resources relevant to local information needs. CONCLUSIONS: The ICNExchange is acceptable, feasible, and useful as a knowledge management and exchange platform in service of the work of ICN. Experience with the ICNExchange suggests that the design principles are extensible to other chronic care Learning Networks. JMIR Publications 2019-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6437610/ /pubmed/30869643 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/formative.9858 Text en ©Daniel McLinden, Sarah Myers, Michael Seid, Melida Busch, David Davis, John Murphy. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (http://formative.jmir.org), 14.03.2019. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Formative Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://formative.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
McLinden, Daniel
Myers, Sarah
Seid, Michael
Busch, Melida
Davis, David
Murphy, John
The Learning Exchange, a Community Knowledge Commons for Learning Networks: Qualitative Evaluation to Test Acceptability, Feasibility, and Utility
title The Learning Exchange, a Community Knowledge Commons for Learning Networks: Qualitative Evaluation to Test Acceptability, Feasibility, and Utility
title_full The Learning Exchange, a Community Knowledge Commons for Learning Networks: Qualitative Evaluation to Test Acceptability, Feasibility, and Utility
title_fullStr The Learning Exchange, a Community Knowledge Commons for Learning Networks: Qualitative Evaluation to Test Acceptability, Feasibility, and Utility
title_full_unstemmed The Learning Exchange, a Community Knowledge Commons for Learning Networks: Qualitative Evaluation to Test Acceptability, Feasibility, and Utility
title_short The Learning Exchange, a Community Knowledge Commons for Learning Networks: Qualitative Evaluation to Test Acceptability, Feasibility, and Utility
title_sort learning exchange, a community knowledge commons for learning networks: qualitative evaluation to test acceptability, feasibility, and utility
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6437610/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30869643
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/formative.9858
work_keys_str_mv AT mclindendaniel thelearningexchangeacommunityknowledgecommonsforlearningnetworksqualitativeevaluationtotestacceptabilityfeasibilityandutility
AT myerssarah thelearningexchangeacommunityknowledgecommonsforlearningnetworksqualitativeevaluationtotestacceptabilityfeasibilityandutility
AT seidmichael thelearningexchangeacommunityknowledgecommonsforlearningnetworksqualitativeevaluationtotestacceptabilityfeasibilityandutility
AT buschmelida thelearningexchangeacommunityknowledgecommonsforlearningnetworksqualitativeevaluationtotestacceptabilityfeasibilityandutility
AT davisdavid thelearningexchangeacommunityknowledgecommonsforlearningnetworksqualitativeevaluationtotestacceptabilityfeasibilityandutility
AT murphyjohn thelearningexchangeacommunityknowledgecommonsforlearningnetworksqualitativeevaluationtotestacceptabilityfeasibilityandutility
AT mclindendaniel learningexchangeacommunityknowledgecommonsforlearningnetworksqualitativeevaluationtotestacceptabilityfeasibilityandutility
AT myerssarah learningexchangeacommunityknowledgecommonsforlearningnetworksqualitativeevaluationtotestacceptabilityfeasibilityandutility
AT seidmichael learningexchangeacommunityknowledgecommonsforlearningnetworksqualitativeevaluationtotestacceptabilityfeasibilityandutility
AT buschmelida learningexchangeacommunityknowledgecommonsforlearningnetworksqualitativeevaluationtotestacceptabilityfeasibilityandutility
AT davisdavid learningexchangeacommunityknowledgecommonsforlearningnetworksqualitativeevaluationtotestacceptabilityfeasibilityandutility
AT murphyjohn learningexchangeacommunityknowledgecommonsforlearningnetworksqualitativeevaluationtotestacceptabilityfeasibilityandutility