Cargando…

Ki67 Quantitative Interpretation: Insights using Image Analysis

BACKGROUND: Proliferation markers, especially Ki67, are increasingly important in diagnosis and prognosis. The best method for calculating Ki67 is still the subject of debate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated an image analysis tool for quantitative interpretation of Ki67 in neuroendocrine tumors...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Volynskaya, Zoya, Mete, Ozgur, Pakbaz, Sara, Al-Ghamdi, Doaa, Asa, Sylvia L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6437785/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30984468
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpi.jpi_76_18
_version_ 1783406988622823424
author Volynskaya, Zoya
Mete, Ozgur
Pakbaz, Sara
Al-Ghamdi, Doaa
Asa, Sylvia L.
author_facet Volynskaya, Zoya
Mete, Ozgur
Pakbaz, Sara
Al-Ghamdi, Doaa
Asa, Sylvia L.
author_sort Volynskaya, Zoya
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Proliferation markers, especially Ki67, are increasingly important in diagnosis and prognosis. The best method for calculating Ki67 is still the subject of debate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated an image analysis tool for quantitative interpretation of Ki67 in neuroendocrine tumors and compared it to manual counts. We expanded a primary digital pathology platform to include the Leica Biosystems image analysis nuclear algorithm. Slides were digitized using a Leica Aperio AT2 Scanner and accessed through the Cerner CoPath LIS interfaced with Aperio eSlideManager through Aperio ImageScope. Selected regions of interest (ROIs) were manually defined and annotated to include tumor cells only; they were then analyzed with the algorithm and by four pathologists counting on printed images. After validation, the algorithm was used to examine the impact of the size and number of areas selected as ROIs. RESULTS: The algorithm provided reproducible results that were obtained within seconds, compared to up to 55 min of manual counting that varied between users. Benefits of image analysis identified by users included accuracy, time savings, and ease of viewing. Access to the algorithm allowed rapid comparisons of Ki67 counts in ROIs that varied in numbers of cells and selection of fields, the outputs demonstrated that the results vary around defined cutoffs that provide tumor grade depending on the number of cells and ROIs counted. CONCLUSIONS: Digital image analysis provides accurate and reproducible quantitative data faster than manual counts. However, access to this tool allows multiple analyses of a single sample to use variable numbers of cells and selection of variable ROIs that can alter the result in clinically significant ways. This study highlights the potential risk of hard cutoffs of continuous variables and indicates that standardization of number of cells and number of regions selected for analysis should be incorporated into guidelines for Ki67 calculations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6437785
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64377852019-04-12 Ki67 Quantitative Interpretation: Insights using Image Analysis Volynskaya, Zoya Mete, Ozgur Pakbaz, Sara Al-Ghamdi, Doaa Asa, Sylvia L. J Pathol Inform Research Article BACKGROUND: Proliferation markers, especially Ki67, are increasingly important in diagnosis and prognosis. The best method for calculating Ki67 is still the subject of debate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated an image analysis tool for quantitative interpretation of Ki67 in neuroendocrine tumors and compared it to manual counts. We expanded a primary digital pathology platform to include the Leica Biosystems image analysis nuclear algorithm. Slides were digitized using a Leica Aperio AT2 Scanner and accessed through the Cerner CoPath LIS interfaced with Aperio eSlideManager through Aperio ImageScope. Selected regions of interest (ROIs) were manually defined and annotated to include tumor cells only; they were then analyzed with the algorithm and by four pathologists counting on printed images. After validation, the algorithm was used to examine the impact of the size and number of areas selected as ROIs. RESULTS: The algorithm provided reproducible results that were obtained within seconds, compared to up to 55 min of manual counting that varied between users. Benefits of image analysis identified by users included accuracy, time savings, and ease of viewing. Access to the algorithm allowed rapid comparisons of Ki67 counts in ROIs that varied in numbers of cells and selection of fields, the outputs demonstrated that the results vary around defined cutoffs that provide tumor grade depending on the number of cells and ROIs counted. CONCLUSIONS: Digital image analysis provides accurate and reproducible quantitative data faster than manual counts. However, access to this tool allows multiple analyses of a single sample to use variable numbers of cells and selection of variable ROIs that can alter the result in clinically significant ways. This study highlights the potential risk of hard cutoffs of continuous variables and indicates that standardization of number of cells and number of regions selected for analysis should be incorporated into guidelines for Ki67 calculations. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6437785/ /pubmed/30984468 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpi.jpi_76_18 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Journal of Pathology Informatics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Research Article
Volynskaya, Zoya
Mete, Ozgur
Pakbaz, Sara
Al-Ghamdi, Doaa
Asa, Sylvia L.
Ki67 Quantitative Interpretation: Insights using Image Analysis
title Ki67 Quantitative Interpretation: Insights using Image Analysis
title_full Ki67 Quantitative Interpretation: Insights using Image Analysis
title_fullStr Ki67 Quantitative Interpretation: Insights using Image Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Ki67 Quantitative Interpretation: Insights using Image Analysis
title_short Ki67 Quantitative Interpretation: Insights using Image Analysis
title_sort ki67 quantitative interpretation: insights using image analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6437785/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30984468
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpi.jpi_76_18
work_keys_str_mv AT volynskayazoya ki67quantitativeinterpretationinsightsusingimageanalysis
AT meteozgur ki67quantitativeinterpretationinsightsusingimageanalysis
AT pakbazsara ki67quantitativeinterpretationinsightsusingimageanalysis
AT alghamdidoaa ki67quantitativeinterpretationinsightsusingimageanalysis
AT asasylvial ki67quantitativeinterpretationinsightsusingimageanalysis