Cargando…

Evaluation of the mortality registry in Ecuador (2001–2013) – social and geographical inequalities in completeness and quality

BACKGROUND: Mortality registries are an essential data source for public health surveillance and for planning and evaluating public policy. Nevertheless, there are still large inequalities in the completeness and quality of mortality registries between and within countries. In Ecuador, there have be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peralta, Andrés, Benach, Joan, Borrell, Carme, Espinel-Flores, Verónica, Cash-Gibson, Lucinda, Queiroz, Bernardo L., Marí-Dell’Olmo, Marc
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6437878/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30922340
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12963-019-0183-y
_version_ 1783407009613217792
author Peralta, Andrés
Benach, Joan
Borrell, Carme
Espinel-Flores, Verónica
Cash-Gibson, Lucinda
Queiroz, Bernardo L.
Marí-Dell’Olmo, Marc
author_facet Peralta, Andrés
Benach, Joan
Borrell, Carme
Espinel-Flores, Verónica
Cash-Gibson, Lucinda
Queiroz, Bernardo L.
Marí-Dell’Olmo, Marc
author_sort Peralta, Andrés
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mortality registries are an essential data source for public health surveillance and for planning and evaluating public policy. Nevertheless, there are still large inequalities in the completeness and quality of mortality registries between and within countries. In Ecuador, there have been few nationwide evaluations of the mortality registry and no evaluations of inequalities between provinces. This kind of analysis is fundamental for strengthening the vital statistics system. METHODS: Ecological study assessing the completeness, quality and internal consistency of mortality data in the provinces of Ecuador, using 13 years of mortality data (2001–2013). Completeness was assessed using three types of death distribution methods (DDMs), quality by estimating the percentages of garbage codes and deaths with unspecified age or sex in the registered deaths, and internal consistency by estimating the percentage of deaths with reported causes of deaths considered impossible in some age–sex combinations. Finally, we propose a classification of the mortality registry in the studied areas based on completeness and quality. RESULTS: Completeness estimates (mean of the three methods used) in the provinces ranged from 21 to 87% in women and from 35 to 89% in men. The percentage of garbage codes in the provinces ranged from 21 to 56% in women and from 25 to 52% in men. Garbage coding was higher in women and in older age groups. The percentage of deaths with unspecified age or sex, and the percentage of deaths with reported causes of deaths considered impossible in some age–sex combinations was low in all the studied areas. The mortality registry could only be classified as acceptable in one area for men and one area for women. CONCLUSIONS: We found substantial inequalities by sex, geographical areas and age in the completeness and quality of the mortality registry of Ecuador. The findings of this study will be helpful to direct measures to improve Ecuador’s vital statistics system and to generate strategies to reduce bias when using mortality data to analyse health inequalities in the country. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12963-019-0183-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6437878
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64378782019-04-08 Evaluation of the mortality registry in Ecuador (2001–2013) – social and geographical inequalities in completeness and quality Peralta, Andrés Benach, Joan Borrell, Carme Espinel-Flores, Verónica Cash-Gibson, Lucinda Queiroz, Bernardo L. Marí-Dell’Olmo, Marc Popul Health Metr Research BACKGROUND: Mortality registries are an essential data source for public health surveillance and for planning and evaluating public policy. Nevertheless, there are still large inequalities in the completeness and quality of mortality registries between and within countries. In Ecuador, there have been few nationwide evaluations of the mortality registry and no evaluations of inequalities between provinces. This kind of analysis is fundamental for strengthening the vital statistics system. METHODS: Ecological study assessing the completeness, quality and internal consistency of mortality data in the provinces of Ecuador, using 13 years of mortality data (2001–2013). Completeness was assessed using three types of death distribution methods (DDMs), quality by estimating the percentages of garbage codes and deaths with unspecified age or sex in the registered deaths, and internal consistency by estimating the percentage of deaths with reported causes of deaths considered impossible in some age–sex combinations. Finally, we propose a classification of the mortality registry in the studied areas based on completeness and quality. RESULTS: Completeness estimates (mean of the three methods used) in the provinces ranged from 21 to 87% in women and from 35 to 89% in men. The percentage of garbage codes in the provinces ranged from 21 to 56% in women and from 25 to 52% in men. Garbage coding was higher in women and in older age groups. The percentage of deaths with unspecified age or sex, and the percentage of deaths with reported causes of deaths considered impossible in some age–sex combinations was low in all the studied areas. The mortality registry could only be classified as acceptable in one area for men and one area for women. CONCLUSIONS: We found substantial inequalities by sex, geographical areas and age in the completeness and quality of the mortality registry of Ecuador. The findings of this study will be helpful to direct measures to improve Ecuador’s vital statistics system and to generate strategies to reduce bias when using mortality data to analyse health inequalities in the country. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12963-019-0183-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6437878/ /pubmed/30922340 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12963-019-0183-y Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Peralta, Andrés
Benach, Joan
Borrell, Carme
Espinel-Flores, Verónica
Cash-Gibson, Lucinda
Queiroz, Bernardo L.
Marí-Dell’Olmo, Marc
Evaluation of the mortality registry in Ecuador (2001–2013) – social and geographical inequalities in completeness and quality
title Evaluation of the mortality registry in Ecuador (2001–2013) – social and geographical inequalities in completeness and quality
title_full Evaluation of the mortality registry in Ecuador (2001–2013) – social and geographical inequalities in completeness and quality
title_fullStr Evaluation of the mortality registry in Ecuador (2001–2013) – social and geographical inequalities in completeness and quality
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the mortality registry in Ecuador (2001–2013) – social and geographical inequalities in completeness and quality
title_short Evaluation of the mortality registry in Ecuador (2001–2013) – social and geographical inequalities in completeness and quality
title_sort evaluation of the mortality registry in ecuador (2001–2013) – social and geographical inequalities in completeness and quality
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6437878/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30922340
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12963-019-0183-y
work_keys_str_mv AT peraltaandres evaluationofthemortalityregistryinecuador20012013socialandgeographicalinequalitiesincompletenessandquality
AT benachjoan evaluationofthemortalityregistryinecuador20012013socialandgeographicalinequalitiesincompletenessandquality
AT borrellcarme evaluationofthemortalityregistryinecuador20012013socialandgeographicalinequalitiesincompletenessandquality
AT espinelfloresveronica evaluationofthemortalityregistryinecuador20012013socialandgeographicalinequalitiesincompletenessandquality
AT cashgibsonlucinda evaluationofthemortalityregistryinecuador20012013socialandgeographicalinequalitiesincompletenessandquality
AT queirozbernardol evaluationofthemortalityregistryinecuador20012013socialandgeographicalinequalitiesincompletenessandquality
AT maridellolmomarc evaluationofthemortalityregistryinecuador20012013socialandgeographicalinequalitiesincompletenessandquality