Cargando…

Comparing stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) versus re-trans-catheter arterial chemoembolization (re-TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma patients who had incomplete response after initial TACE (TASABR): a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounts for 75–85% of primary liver cancers and is prevalent in the Asia-Pacific region. Till now, trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is still one of common modalities in managing unresectable intermediate-stage HCC. However, post-TACE residual viable...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Liang-Cheng, Chiou, Wen-Yen, Lin, Hon-Yi, Lee, Moon-Sing, Lo, Yuan-Chen, Huang, Li-Wen, Chang, Chun-Ming, Hung, Tsung-Hsing, Lin, Chih-Wen, Tseng, Kuo-Chih, Liu, Dai-Wei, Hsu, Feng-Chun, Hung, Shih-Kai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6437913/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30922261
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5461-3
_version_ 1783407017443983360
author Chen, Liang-Cheng
Chiou, Wen-Yen
Lin, Hon-Yi
Lee, Moon-Sing
Lo, Yuan-Chen
Huang, Li-Wen
Chang, Chun-Ming
Hung, Tsung-Hsing
Lin, Chih-Wen
Tseng, Kuo-Chih
Liu, Dai-Wei
Hsu, Feng-Chun
Hung, Shih-Kai
author_facet Chen, Liang-Cheng
Chiou, Wen-Yen
Lin, Hon-Yi
Lee, Moon-Sing
Lo, Yuan-Chen
Huang, Li-Wen
Chang, Chun-Ming
Hung, Tsung-Hsing
Lin, Chih-Wen
Tseng, Kuo-Chih
Liu, Dai-Wei
Hsu, Feng-Chun
Hung, Shih-Kai
author_sort Chen, Liang-Cheng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounts for 75–85% of primary liver cancers and is prevalent in the Asia-Pacific region. Till now, trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is still one of common modalities in managing unresectable intermediate-stage HCC. However, post-TACE residual viable HCC is not uncommon, resulting in unsatisfied overall survival after TACE alone. Recently, stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) has been suggested to manage HCC curatively. However, evidence from phase-III trials is largely lacking. Hence, the present phase III randomized trial is designed to compare clinical outcomes between SABR and re-TACE for unresectable HCC patients who had incomplete response after initial TACE. METHODS: The present study is an open-label, parallel, randomized controlled trial. A total of 120 patients will be included into two study groups, i.e., SABR and re-TACE, with a 1:1 allocation rate. A 3-year allocating period is planned. Patients with incomplete response after initial TACE will be enrolled and randomized. The primary endpoint is 1-year freedom-form-local-progression rate. Secondary endpoints are disease-progression-free survival, overall survival, local control, response rate, toxicity, and duration of response of the treated tumor. DISCUSSION: SABR has been reported as an effective modality in managing intermediate-stage HCC patients, but evidence from phase-III randomized trials is largely lacking. As a result, conducting randomized trials to demarcate the role of SABR in these patients is warranted, especially in the Asia-Pacific region, where HBV- and HCV-related HCCs are prevalent. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Before enrolling participants, the present study was registered prospectively on ClinicalTrials.gov (trial identifier, NCT02921139) on Sep. 29, 2016. This study is ongoing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6437913
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64379132019-04-08 Comparing stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) versus re-trans-catheter arterial chemoembolization (re-TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma patients who had incomplete response after initial TACE (TASABR): a randomized controlled trial Chen, Liang-Cheng Chiou, Wen-Yen Lin, Hon-Yi Lee, Moon-Sing Lo, Yuan-Chen Huang, Li-Wen Chang, Chun-Ming Hung, Tsung-Hsing Lin, Chih-Wen Tseng, Kuo-Chih Liu, Dai-Wei Hsu, Feng-Chun Hung, Shih-Kai BMC Cancer Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounts for 75–85% of primary liver cancers and is prevalent in the Asia-Pacific region. Till now, trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is still one of common modalities in managing unresectable intermediate-stage HCC. However, post-TACE residual viable HCC is not uncommon, resulting in unsatisfied overall survival after TACE alone. Recently, stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) has been suggested to manage HCC curatively. However, evidence from phase-III trials is largely lacking. Hence, the present phase III randomized trial is designed to compare clinical outcomes between SABR and re-TACE for unresectable HCC patients who had incomplete response after initial TACE. METHODS: The present study is an open-label, parallel, randomized controlled trial. A total of 120 patients will be included into two study groups, i.e., SABR and re-TACE, with a 1:1 allocation rate. A 3-year allocating period is planned. Patients with incomplete response after initial TACE will be enrolled and randomized. The primary endpoint is 1-year freedom-form-local-progression rate. Secondary endpoints are disease-progression-free survival, overall survival, local control, response rate, toxicity, and duration of response of the treated tumor. DISCUSSION: SABR has been reported as an effective modality in managing intermediate-stage HCC patients, but evidence from phase-III randomized trials is largely lacking. As a result, conducting randomized trials to demarcate the role of SABR in these patients is warranted, especially in the Asia-Pacific region, where HBV- and HCV-related HCCs are prevalent. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Before enrolling participants, the present study was registered prospectively on ClinicalTrials.gov (trial identifier, NCT02921139) on Sep. 29, 2016. This study is ongoing. BioMed Central 2019-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6437913/ /pubmed/30922261 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5461-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Chen, Liang-Cheng
Chiou, Wen-Yen
Lin, Hon-Yi
Lee, Moon-Sing
Lo, Yuan-Chen
Huang, Li-Wen
Chang, Chun-Ming
Hung, Tsung-Hsing
Lin, Chih-Wen
Tseng, Kuo-Chih
Liu, Dai-Wei
Hsu, Feng-Chun
Hung, Shih-Kai
Comparing stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) versus re-trans-catheter arterial chemoembolization (re-TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma patients who had incomplete response after initial TACE (TASABR): a randomized controlled trial
title Comparing stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) versus re-trans-catheter arterial chemoembolization (re-TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma patients who had incomplete response after initial TACE (TASABR): a randomized controlled trial
title_full Comparing stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) versus re-trans-catheter arterial chemoembolization (re-TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma patients who had incomplete response after initial TACE (TASABR): a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Comparing stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) versus re-trans-catheter arterial chemoembolization (re-TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma patients who had incomplete response after initial TACE (TASABR): a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparing stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) versus re-trans-catheter arterial chemoembolization (re-TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma patients who had incomplete response after initial TACE (TASABR): a randomized controlled trial
title_short Comparing stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) versus re-trans-catheter arterial chemoembolization (re-TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma patients who had incomplete response after initial TACE (TASABR): a randomized controlled trial
title_sort comparing stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (sabr) versus re-trans-catheter arterial chemoembolization (re-tace) for hepatocellular carcinoma patients who had incomplete response after initial tace (tasabr): a randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6437913/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30922261
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5461-3
work_keys_str_mv AT chenliangcheng comparingstereotacticablativeradiotherapysabrversusretranscatheterarterialchemoembolizationretaceforhepatocellularcarcinomapatientswhohadincompleteresponseafterinitialtacetasabrarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chiouwenyen comparingstereotacticablativeradiotherapysabrversusretranscatheterarterialchemoembolizationretaceforhepatocellularcarcinomapatientswhohadincompleteresponseafterinitialtacetasabrarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT linhonyi comparingstereotacticablativeradiotherapysabrversusretranscatheterarterialchemoembolizationretaceforhepatocellularcarcinomapatientswhohadincompleteresponseafterinitialtacetasabrarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT leemoonsing comparingstereotacticablativeradiotherapysabrversusretranscatheterarterialchemoembolizationretaceforhepatocellularcarcinomapatientswhohadincompleteresponseafterinitialtacetasabrarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT loyuanchen comparingstereotacticablativeradiotherapysabrversusretranscatheterarterialchemoembolizationretaceforhepatocellularcarcinomapatientswhohadincompleteresponseafterinitialtacetasabrarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT huangliwen comparingstereotacticablativeradiotherapysabrversusretranscatheterarterialchemoembolizationretaceforhepatocellularcarcinomapatientswhohadincompleteresponseafterinitialtacetasabrarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT changchunming comparingstereotacticablativeradiotherapysabrversusretranscatheterarterialchemoembolizationretaceforhepatocellularcarcinomapatientswhohadincompleteresponseafterinitialtacetasabrarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hungtsunghsing comparingstereotacticablativeradiotherapysabrversusretranscatheterarterialchemoembolizationretaceforhepatocellularcarcinomapatientswhohadincompleteresponseafterinitialtacetasabrarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT linchihwen comparingstereotacticablativeradiotherapysabrversusretranscatheterarterialchemoembolizationretaceforhepatocellularcarcinomapatientswhohadincompleteresponseafterinitialtacetasabrarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT tsengkuochih comparingstereotacticablativeradiotherapysabrversusretranscatheterarterialchemoembolizationretaceforhepatocellularcarcinomapatientswhohadincompleteresponseafterinitialtacetasabrarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT liudaiwei comparingstereotacticablativeradiotherapysabrversusretranscatheterarterialchemoembolizationretaceforhepatocellularcarcinomapatientswhohadincompleteresponseafterinitialtacetasabrarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hsufengchun comparingstereotacticablativeradiotherapysabrversusretranscatheterarterialchemoembolizationretaceforhepatocellularcarcinomapatientswhohadincompleteresponseafterinitialtacetasabrarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hungshihkai comparingstereotacticablativeradiotherapysabrversusretranscatheterarterialchemoembolizationretaceforhepatocellularcarcinomapatientswhohadincompleteresponseafterinitialtacetasabrarandomizedcontrolledtrial