Cargando…
Comparing stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) versus re-trans-catheter arterial chemoembolization (re-TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma patients who had incomplete response after initial TACE (TASABR): a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounts for 75–85% of primary liver cancers and is prevalent in the Asia-Pacific region. Till now, trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is still one of common modalities in managing unresectable intermediate-stage HCC. However, post-TACE residual viable...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6437913/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30922261 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5461-3 |
_version_ | 1783407017443983360 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Liang-Cheng Chiou, Wen-Yen Lin, Hon-Yi Lee, Moon-Sing Lo, Yuan-Chen Huang, Li-Wen Chang, Chun-Ming Hung, Tsung-Hsing Lin, Chih-Wen Tseng, Kuo-Chih Liu, Dai-Wei Hsu, Feng-Chun Hung, Shih-Kai |
author_facet | Chen, Liang-Cheng Chiou, Wen-Yen Lin, Hon-Yi Lee, Moon-Sing Lo, Yuan-Chen Huang, Li-Wen Chang, Chun-Ming Hung, Tsung-Hsing Lin, Chih-Wen Tseng, Kuo-Chih Liu, Dai-Wei Hsu, Feng-Chun Hung, Shih-Kai |
author_sort | Chen, Liang-Cheng |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounts for 75–85% of primary liver cancers and is prevalent in the Asia-Pacific region. Till now, trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is still one of common modalities in managing unresectable intermediate-stage HCC. However, post-TACE residual viable HCC is not uncommon, resulting in unsatisfied overall survival after TACE alone. Recently, stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) has been suggested to manage HCC curatively. However, evidence from phase-III trials is largely lacking. Hence, the present phase III randomized trial is designed to compare clinical outcomes between SABR and re-TACE for unresectable HCC patients who had incomplete response after initial TACE. METHODS: The present study is an open-label, parallel, randomized controlled trial. A total of 120 patients will be included into two study groups, i.e., SABR and re-TACE, with a 1:1 allocation rate. A 3-year allocating period is planned. Patients with incomplete response after initial TACE will be enrolled and randomized. The primary endpoint is 1-year freedom-form-local-progression rate. Secondary endpoints are disease-progression-free survival, overall survival, local control, response rate, toxicity, and duration of response of the treated tumor. DISCUSSION: SABR has been reported as an effective modality in managing intermediate-stage HCC patients, but evidence from phase-III randomized trials is largely lacking. As a result, conducting randomized trials to demarcate the role of SABR in these patients is warranted, especially in the Asia-Pacific region, where HBV- and HCV-related HCCs are prevalent. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Before enrolling participants, the present study was registered prospectively on ClinicalTrials.gov (trial identifier, NCT02921139) on Sep. 29, 2016. This study is ongoing. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6437913 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64379132019-04-08 Comparing stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) versus re-trans-catheter arterial chemoembolization (re-TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma patients who had incomplete response after initial TACE (TASABR): a randomized controlled trial Chen, Liang-Cheng Chiou, Wen-Yen Lin, Hon-Yi Lee, Moon-Sing Lo, Yuan-Chen Huang, Li-Wen Chang, Chun-Ming Hung, Tsung-Hsing Lin, Chih-Wen Tseng, Kuo-Chih Liu, Dai-Wei Hsu, Feng-Chun Hung, Shih-Kai BMC Cancer Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounts for 75–85% of primary liver cancers and is prevalent in the Asia-Pacific region. Till now, trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is still one of common modalities in managing unresectable intermediate-stage HCC. However, post-TACE residual viable HCC is not uncommon, resulting in unsatisfied overall survival after TACE alone. Recently, stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) has been suggested to manage HCC curatively. However, evidence from phase-III trials is largely lacking. Hence, the present phase III randomized trial is designed to compare clinical outcomes between SABR and re-TACE for unresectable HCC patients who had incomplete response after initial TACE. METHODS: The present study is an open-label, parallel, randomized controlled trial. A total of 120 patients will be included into two study groups, i.e., SABR and re-TACE, with a 1:1 allocation rate. A 3-year allocating period is planned. Patients with incomplete response after initial TACE will be enrolled and randomized. The primary endpoint is 1-year freedom-form-local-progression rate. Secondary endpoints are disease-progression-free survival, overall survival, local control, response rate, toxicity, and duration of response of the treated tumor. DISCUSSION: SABR has been reported as an effective modality in managing intermediate-stage HCC patients, but evidence from phase-III randomized trials is largely lacking. As a result, conducting randomized trials to demarcate the role of SABR in these patients is warranted, especially in the Asia-Pacific region, where HBV- and HCV-related HCCs are prevalent. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Before enrolling participants, the present study was registered prospectively on ClinicalTrials.gov (trial identifier, NCT02921139) on Sep. 29, 2016. This study is ongoing. BioMed Central 2019-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6437913/ /pubmed/30922261 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5461-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Chen, Liang-Cheng Chiou, Wen-Yen Lin, Hon-Yi Lee, Moon-Sing Lo, Yuan-Chen Huang, Li-Wen Chang, Chun-Ming Hung, Tsung-Hsing Lin, Chih-Wen Tseng, Kuo-Chih Liu, Dai-Wei Hsu, Feng-Chun Hung, Shih-Kai Comparing stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) versus re-trans-catheter arterial chemoembolization (re-TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma patients who had incomplete response after initial TACE (TASABR): a randomized controlled trial |
title | Comparing stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) versus re-trans-catheter arterial chemoembolization (re-TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma patients who had incomplete response after initial TACE (TASABR): a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Comparing stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) versus re-trans-catheter arterial chemoembolization (re-TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma patients who had incomplete response after initial TACE (TASABR): a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Comparing stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) versus re-trans-catheter arterial chemoembolization (re-TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma patients who had incomplete response after initial TACE (TASABR): a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) versus re-trans-catheter arterial chemoembolization (re-TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma patients who had incomplete response after initial TACE (TASABR): a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Comparing stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) versus re-trans-catheter arterial chemoembolization (re-TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma patients who had incomplete response after initial TACE (TASABR): a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | comparing stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (sabr) versus re-trans-catheter arterial chemoembolization (re-tace) for hepatocellular carcinoma patients who had incomplete response after initial tace (tasabr): a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6437913/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30922261 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5461-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenliangcheng comparingstereotacticablativeradiotherapysabrversusretranscatheterarterialchemoembolizationretaceforhepatocellularcarcinomapatientswhohadincompleteresponseafterinitialtacetasabrarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT chiouwenyen comparingstereotacticablativeradiotherapysabrversusretranscatheterarterialchemoembolizationretaceforhepatocellularcarcinomapatientswhohadincompleteresponseafterinitialtacetasabrarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT linhonyi comparingstereotacticablativeradiotherapysabrversusretranscatheterarterialchemoembolizationretaceforhepatocellularcarcinomapatientswhohadincompleteresponseafterinitialtacetasabrarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT leemoonsing comparingstereotacticablativeradiotherapysabrversusretranscatheterarterialchemoembolizationretaceforhepatocellularcarcinomapatientswhohadincompleteresponseafterinitialtacetasabrarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT loyuanchen comparingstereotacticablativeradiotherapysabrversusretranscatheterarterialchemoembolizationretaceforhepatocellularcarcinomapatientswhohadincompleteresponseafterinitialtacetasabrarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT huangliwen comparingstereotacticablativeradiotherapysabrversusretranscatheterarterialchemoembolizationretaceforhepatocellularcarcinomapatientswhohadincompleteresponseafterinitialtacetasabrarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT changchunming comparingstereotacticablativeradiotherapysabrversusretranscatheterarterialchemoembolizationretaceforhepatocellularcarcinomapatientswhohadincompleteresponseafterinitialtacetasabrarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hungtsunghsing comparingstereotacticablativeradiotherapysabrversusretranscatheterarterialchemoembolizationretaceforhepatocellularcarcinomapatientswhohadincompleteresponseafterinitialtacetasabrarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT linchihwen comparingstereotacticablativeradiotherapysabrversusretranscatheterarterialchemoembolizationretaceforhepatocellularcarcinomapatientswhohadincompleteresponseafterinitialtacetasabrarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT tsengkuochih comparingstereotacticablativeradiotherapysabrversusretranscatheterarterialchemoembolizationretaceforhepatocellularcarcinomapatientswhohadincompleteresponseafterinitialtacetasabrarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT liudaiwei comparingstereotacticablativeradiotherapysabrversusretranscatheterarterialchemoembolizationretaceforhepatocellularcarcinomapatientswhohadincompleteresponseafterinitialtacetasabrarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hsufengchun comparingstereotacticablativeradiotherapysabrversusretranscatheterarterialchemoembolizationretaceforhepatocellularcarcinomapatientswhohadincompleteresponseafterinitialtacetasabrarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hungshihkai comparingstereotacticablativeradiotherapysabrversusretranscatheterarterialchemoembolizationretaceforhepatocellularcarcinomapatientswhohadincompleteresponseafterinitialtacetasabrarandomizedcontrolledtrial |