Cargando…
Recent trends from the results of clinical trials on gastric cancer surgery
The Japan Clinical Oncology Group has recently conducted large scale clinical trials with findings that have revealed pivotal strategies for the treatment of resectable gastric cancer surgery. These findings include the fact that D3 lymphadenectomy does not improve survival rates when compared to D2...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6437915/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30917873 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40880-019-0360-1 |
_version_ | 1783407017895919616 |
---|---|
author | Kiyokawa, Takashi Fukagawa, Takeo |
author_facet | Kiyokawa, Takashi Fukagawa, Takeo |
author_sort | Kiyokawa, Takashi |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Japan Clinical Oncology Group has recently conducted large scale clinical trials with findings that have revealed pivotal strategies for the treatment of resectable gastric cancer surgery. These findings include the fact that D3 lymphadenectomy does not improve survival rates when compared to D2 lymphadenectomy, and it is not recommended for resectable gastric cancer. Also, a transhiatal approach is recommended, instead of the left thoraco-abdominal approach, for the treatment of adenocarcinoma of the esophago-gastric junction or gastric cardia which has invaded ≤ 3 cm of the esophagus. Gastrectomy with splenectomy and bursectomy had been recommended as a part of the D2 lymphadenectomy. However, the results of the recent clinical trials revealed that splenectomy should be avoided in total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for proximal gastric cancer and that bursectomy should be avoided in gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for resectable gastric cancer. Both splenectomy and bursectomy were found to be unable to improve survival, but instead increased operative morbidity. These trials revealed that the above-mentioned invasive and aggressive procedures did not provide sufficient survival benefits and that gastric cancer surgery may be trending from an “invasive to less invasive” and “aggressive to more conservative” approach. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6437915 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64379152019-04-11 Recent trends from the results of clinical trials on gastric cancer surgery Kiyokawa, Takashi Fukagawa, Takeo Cancer Commun (Lond) Review The Japan Clinical Oncology Group has recently conducted large scale clinical trials with findings that have revealed pivotal strategies for the treatment of resectable gastric cancer surgery. These findings include the fact that D3 lymphadenectomy does not improve survival rates when compared to D2 lymphadenectomy, and it is not recommended for resectable gastric cancer. Also, a transhiatal approach is recommended, instead of the left thoraco-abdominal approach, for the treatment of adenocarcinoma of the esophago-gastric junction or gastric cardia which has invaded ≤ 3 cm of the esophagus. Gastrectomy with splenectomy and bursectomy had been recommended as a part of the D2 lymphadenectomy. However, the results of the recent clinical trials revealed that splenectomy should be avoided in total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for proximal gastric cancer and that bursectomy should be avoided in gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for resectable gastric cancer. Both splenectomy and bursectomy were found to be unable to improve survival, but instead increased operative morbidity. These trials revealed that the above-mentioned invasive and aggressive procedures did not provide sufficient survival benefits and that gastric cancer surgery may be trending from an “invasive to less invasive” and “aggressive to more conservative” approach. BioMed Central 2019-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6437915/ /pubmed/30917873 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40880-019-0360-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Review Kiyokawa, Takashi Fukagawa, Takeo Recent trends from the results of clinical trials on gastric cancer surgery |
title | Recent trends from the results of clinical trials on gastric cancer surgery |
title_full | Recent trends from the results of clinical trials on gastric cancer surgery |
title_fullStr | Recent trends from the results of clinical trials on gastric cancer surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | Recent trends from the results of clinical trials on gastric cancer surgery |
title_short | Recent trends from the results of clinical trials on gastric cancer surgery |
title_sort | recent trends from the results of clinical trials on gastric cancer surgery |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6437915/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30917873 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40880-019-0360-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kiyokawatakashi recenttrendsfromtheresultsofclinicaltrialsongastriccancersurgery AT fukagawatakeo recenttrendsfromtheresultsofclinicaltrialsongastriccancersurgery |