Cargando…

Maternal and neonatal outcome of reverse breech extraction of an impacted fetal head during caesarean section in advanced stage of labour: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: Caesarean section with extraction of a deeply impacted fetal head is technically challenging and is associated with serious maternal and neonatal complications. The purpose of the study was to identify risks and evaluate selected outcome parameters associated with difficult fetal head ex...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lenz, Franziska, Kimmich, Nina, Zimmermann, Roland, Kreft, Martina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6437943/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30917799
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2253-3
_version_ 1783407024401285120
author Lenz, Franziska
Kimmich, Nina
Zimmermann, Roland
Kreft, Martina
author_facet Lenz, Franziska
Kimmich, Nina
Zimmermann, Roland
Kreft, Martina
author_sort Lenz, Franziska
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Caesarean section with extraction of a deeply impacted fetal head is technically challenging and is associated with serious maternal and neonatal complications. The purpose of the study was to identify risks and evaluate selected outcome parameters associated with difficult fetal head extraction during caesarean section in advanced labour comparing two different extraction techniques (head pushing vs. reverse breech). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at the Division of Obstetrics in a tertiary care hospital in Zurich, Switzerland. 629 women at term with a singleton pregnancy in cephalic presentation during advanced intrapartum caesarean section from December 2012 until December 2016 were evaluated. Primary outcome was the incidence of uterine incision extensions. Secondary outcomes were other selected maternal and neonatal outcome parameters. Data analysis was performed using SPSS with Mann-Whitney U independent sampling test and two-tailed Fisher’s exact test (p < 0.01). RESULTS: Difficult fetal head extractions are associated with significantly elevated maternal and neonatal risks. When performed by reverse breech technique, significant lower rates of extensions of the uterine incision, shorter operation times and less operative blood loss were identified compared to the head pushing method. No statistically significant differences for the neonatal outcomes were described so far. However, among the group of difficult fetal delivery with the head pushing method two neonates had perinatal skull fractures, with one of those resulting in neonatal death. CONCLUSIONS: The head pushing method is associated with higher maternal morbidity than the reverse breech method for extraction of a deeply engaged fetus during intrapartum caesarean section in advanced stage of labour.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6437943
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64379432019-04-08 Maternal and neonatal outcome of reverse breech extraction of an impacted fetal head during caesarean section in advanced stage of labour: a retrospective cohort study Lenz, Franziska Kimmich, Nina Zimmermann, Roland Kreft, Martina BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Caesarean section with extraction of a deeply impacted fetal head is technically challenging and is associated with serious maternal and neonatal complications. The purpose of the study was to identify risks and evaluate selected outcome parameters associated with difficult fetal head extraction during caesarean section in advanced labour comparing two different extraction techniques (head pushing vs. reverse breech). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at the Division of Obstetrics in a tertiary care hospital in Zurich, Switzerland. 629 women at term with a singleton pregnancy in cephalic presentation during advanced intrapartum caesarean section from December 2012 until December 2016 were evaluated. Primary outcome was the incidence of uterine incision extensions. Secondary outcomes were other selected maternal and neonatal outcome parameters. Data analysis was performed using SPSS with Mann-Whitney U independent sampling test and two-tailed Fisher’s exact test (p < 0.01). RESULTS: Difficult fetal head extractions are associated with significantly elevated maternal and neonatal risks. When performed by reverse breech technique, significant lower rates of extensions of the uterine incision, shorter operation times and less operative blood loss were identified compared to the head pushing method. No statistically significant differences for the neonatal outcomes were described so far. However, among the group of difficult fetal delivery with the head pushing method two neonates had perinatal skull fractures, with one of those resulting in neonatal death. CONCLUSIONS: The head pushing method is associated with higher maternal morbidity than the reverse breech method for extraction of a deeply engaged fetus during intrapartum caesarean section in advanced stage of labour. BioMed Central 2019-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6437943/ /pubmed/30917799 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2253-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lenz, Franziska
Kimmich, Nina
Zimmermann, Roland
Kreft, Martina
Maternal and neonatal outcome of reverse breech extraction of an impacted fetal head during caesarean section in advanced stage of labour: a retrospective cohort study
title Maternal and neonatal outcome of reverse breech extraction of an impacted fetal head during caesarean section in advanced stage of labour: a retrospective cohort study
title_full Maternal and neonatal outcome of reverse breech extraction of an impacted fetal head during caesarean section in advanced stage of labour: a retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Maternal and neonatal outcome of reverse breech extraction of an impacted fetal head during caesarean section in advanced stage of labour: a retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Maternal and neonatal outcome of reverse breech extraction of an impacted fetal head during caesarean section in advanced stage of labour: a retrospective cohort study
title_short Maternal and neonatal outcome of reverse breech extraction of an impacted fetal head during caesarean section in advanced stage of labour: a retrospective cohort study
title_sort maternal and neonatal outcome of reverse breech extraction of an impacted fetal head during caesarean section in advanced stage of labour: a retrospective cohort study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6437943/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30917799
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2253-3
work_keys_str_mv AT lenzfranziska maternalandneonataloutcomeofreversebreechextractionofanimpactedfetalheadduringcaesareansectioninadvancedstageoflabouraretrospectivecohortstudy
AT kimmichnina maternalandneonataloutcomeofreversebreechextractionofanimpactedfetalheadduringcaesareansectioninadvancedstageoflabouraretrospectivecohortstudy
AT zimmermannroland maternalandneonataloutcomeofreversebreechextractionofanimpactedfetalheadduringcaesareansectioninadvancedstageoflabouraretrospectivecohortstudy
AT kreftmartina maternalandneonataloutcomeofreversebreechextractionofanimpactedfetalheadduringcaesareansectioninadvancedstageoflabouraretrospectivecohortstudy