Cargando…

Accuracy of malaria diagnosis by clinical laboratories in Belgium

BACKGROUND: The Belgian Reference Laboratory for Plasmodium offers a free-of-charge reference testing of malaria-positive or doubtful samples to clinical laboratories. METHODS: The final malaria diagnosis from the Reference Laboratory (microscopy, rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) and Plasmodium species...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Loomans, Laura, Conesa Botella, Anali, D’hondt, Agnes, Verschueren, Jacob, Van den Bossche, Dorien, Van Esbroeck, Marjan, Jacobs, Jan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6437969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30922316
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-019-2731-0
_version_ 1783407030545940480
author Loomans, Laura
Conesa Botella, Anali
D’hondt, Agnes
Verschueren, Jacob
Van den Bossche, Dorien
Van Esbroeck, Marjan
Jacobs, Jan
author_facet Loomans, Laura
Conesa Botella, Anali
D’hondt, Agnes
Verschueren, Jacob
Van den Bossche, Dorien
Van Esbroeck, Marjan
Jacobs, Jan
author_sort Loomans, Laura
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Belgian Reference Laboratory for Plasmodium offers a free-of-charge reference testing of malaria-positive or doubtful samples to clinical laboratories. METHODS: The final malaria diagnosis from the Reference Laboratory (microscopy, rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) and Plasmodium species-specific PCR) were compared with the final diagnosis from peripheral Belgian laboratories. The Reference Laboratory reports were analysed for all samples submitted between 2013 and 2017. Criteria assessed included the diagnosis of malaria, Plasmodium species identification including mixed infections, and in case of Plasmodium falciparum, the parasite density and the presence of sexual and asexual stages. RESULTS: A total of 947 non-duplicate samples were included. Reference testing confirmed 96.3% (893/927) and 90.0% (18/20) samples submitted as positive and negative, respectively, the two missed diagnoses were samples with Plasmodium ovale and Plasmodium malariae. Submitting laboratories had correctly identified P. falciparum in 95.1% (508/534) samples with P. falciparum single infection. They had correctly diagnosed the species in 62.9% (95/151) single non-falciparum samples and had reported ‘non-falciparum’ in another 26 (17.2%) samples; most errors occurred among P. malariae (n = 8/21, 38.1%) and P. ovale (n = 14/51, 27.5%). Only one of the 21 mixed Plasmodium species infections had been diagnosed as such by the submitting laboratories; in three of them, P. falciparum had been overlooked. Taken single and mixed infections together, P. falciparum was diagnosed in 98.6% (546/554) samples. Among 471 single P. falciparum samples available for comparison, laboratories had correctly reported parasite densities above 2% in 87.5% (70/80) samples; they had incorrectly reported parasite densities > 2% in an extra 52 (8.9%) samples. Laboratories had correctly reported P. falciparum schizonts and gametocytes in 25.6% (11/43) and 56.7% (17/30) samples, respectively. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic laboratories in a malaria non-endemic setting provided excellent diagnosis of malaria and P. falciparum, reasonably good diagnosis of non-falciparum infections and acceptable calculation of P. falciparum parasite density.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6437969
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64379692019-04-08 Accuracy of malaria diagnosis by clinical laboratories in Belgium Loomans, Laura Conesa Botella, Anali D’hondt, Agnes Verschueren, Jacob Van den Bossche, Dorien Van Esbroeck, Marjan Jacobs, Jan Malar J Research BACKGROUND: The Belgian Reference Laboratory for Plasmodium offers a free-of-charge reference testing of malaria-positive or doubtful samples to clinical laboratories. METHODS: The final malaria diagnosis from the Reference Laboratory (microscopy, rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) and Plasmodium species-specific PCR) were compared with the final diagnosis from peripheral Belgian laboratories. The Reference Laboratory reports were analysed for all samples submitted between 2013 and 2017. Criteria assessed included the diagnosis of malaria, Plasmodium species identification including mixed infections, and in case of Plasmodium falciparum, the parasite density and the presence of sexual and asexual stages. RESULTS: A total of 947 non-duplicate samples were included. Reference testing confirmed 96.3% (893/927) and 90.0% (18/20) samples submitted as positive and negative, respectively, the two missed diagnoses were samples with Plasmodium ovale and Plasmodium malariae. Submitting laboratories had correctly identified P. falciparum in 95.1% (508/534) samples with P. falciparum single infection. They had correctly diagnosed the species in 62.9% (95/151) single non-falciparum samples and had reported ‘non-falciparum’ in another 26 (17.2%) samples; most errors occurred among P. malariae (n = 8/21, 38.1%) and P. ovale (n = 14/51, 27.5%). Only one of the 21 mixed Plasmodium species infections had been diagnosed as such by the submitting laboratories; in three of them, P. falciparum had been overlooked. Taken single and mixed infections together, P. falciparum was diagnosed in 98.6% (546/554) samples. Among 471 single P. falciparum samples available for comparison, laboratories had correctly reported parasite densities above 2% in 87.5% (70/80) samples; they had incorrectly reported parasite densities > 2% in an extra 52 (8.9%) samples. Laboratories had correctly reported P. falciparum schizonts and gametocytes in 25.6% (11/43) and 56.7% (17/30) samples, respectively. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic laboratories in a malaria non-endemic setting provided excellent diagnosis of malaria and P. falciparum, reasonably good diagnosis of non-falciparum infections and acceptable calculation of P. falciparum parasite density. BioMed Central 2019-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6437969/ /pubmed/30922316 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-019-2731-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Loomans, Laura
Conesa Botella, Anali
D’hondt, Agnes
Verschueren, Jacob
Van den Bossche, Dorien
Van Esbroeck, Marjan
Jacobs, Jan
Accuracy of malaria diagnosis by clinical laboratories in Belgium
title Accuracy of malaria diagnosis by clinical laboratories in Belgium
title_full Accuracy of malaria diagnosis by clinical laboratories in Belgium
title_fullStr Accuracy of malaria diagnosis by clinical laboratories in Belgium
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of malaria diagnosis by clinical laboratories in Belgium
title_short Accuracy of malaria diagnosis by clinical laboratories in Belgium
title_sort accuracy of malaria diagnosis by clinical laboratories in belgium
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6437969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30922316
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-019-2731-0
work_keys_str_mv AT loomanslaura accuracyofmalariadiagnosisbyclinicallaboratoriesinbelgium
AT conesabotellaanali accuracyofmalariadiagnosisbyclinicallaboratoriesinbelgium
AT dhondtagnes accuracyofmalariadiagnosisbyclinicallaboratoriesinbelgium
AT verschuerenjacob accuracyofmalariadiagnosisbyclinicallaboratoriesinbelgium
AT vandenbosschedorien accuracyofmalariadiagnosisbyclinicallaboratoriesinbelgium
AT vanesbroeckmarjan accuracyofmalariadiagnosisbyclinicallaboratoriesinbelgium
AT jacobsjan accuracyofmalariadiagnosisbyclinicallaboratoriesinbelgium