Cargando…

A loaded self-managed exercise programme for patellofemoral pain: a mixed methods feasibility study

BACKGROUND: A novel loaded self-managed exercise programme that includes pain education and self-management strategies may result in better outcomes for people with patellofemoral pain (PFP). However, establishing program feasibility is an essential first step before testing efficacy. The purpose of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smith, Benjamin E., Hendrick, Paul, Bateman, Marcus, Moffatt, Fiona, Rathleff, Michael Skovdal, Selfe, James, Smith, Toby O., Logan, Pip
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6438027/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30917806
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2516-1
_version_ 1783407044197351424
author Smith, Benjamin E.
Hendrick, Paul
Bateman, Marcus
Moffatt, Fiona
Rathleff, Michael Skovdal
Selfe, James
Smith, Toby O.
Logan, Pip
author_facet Smith, Benjamin E.
Hendrick, Paul
Bateman, Marcus
Moffatt, Fiona
Rathleff, Michael Skovdal
Selfe, James
Smith, Toby O.
Logan, Pip
author_sort Smith, Benjamin E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A novel loaded self-managed exercise programme that includes pain education and self-management strategies may result in better outcomes for people with patellofemoral pain (PFP). However, establishing program feasibility is an essential first step before testing efficacy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of conducting a definitive RCT which will evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a loaded self-managed exercise programme for people with PFP compared with usual physiotherapy. METHODS: In a mixed methods, pragmatic, randomised controlled feasibility study, 60 participants with PFP (57% female; mean age 29 years) were recruited from a physiotherapy clinic within a large UK teaching hospital. They were randomly allocated to receive either a loaded self-managed exercise programme (n = 30) or usual physiotherapy (n = 30). Feasibility indicators of process, resources, and management were collected through follow-up of standardised questionnaires six months after recruitment and semi-structured interviews with 20 participants and physiotherapists. RESULTS: Recruitment rate was 5 participants per month; consent rate was 99%; adherence to intervention appointments was 87%; completeness of questionnaire data was 100%; and adherence to intervention delivery was 95%. Three exercise diaries were returned at six months (5%). At six months, 25 questionnaire booklets were returned (9 in the loaded self-managed group, 16 in the usual physiotherapy group), with a total retention rate of 42%. At six months, 56% (5/9) of respondents in the loaded self-managed group and 56% (9/16) in the usual physiotherapy group were classified as ‘recovered’. Both groups demonstrated improvements in average pain (VAS), kinesiophobia, pain catastrophizing, general self-efficacy and EQ-5D-5 L from baseline to six months. CONCLUSION: The results of this feasibility study confirm that it is feasible and acceptable to deliver a loaded self-managed exercise programme to adults with PFP in an NHS physiotherapy outpatient setting. However, between group differences in lost to follow up and poor exercise diary completion mean we are uncertain on some feasibility aspects. These methodological issues need addressing prior to conducting a definitive RCT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN 35272486. Registered 19th December 2016.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6438027
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64380272019-04-08 A loaded self-managed exercise programme for patellofemoral pain: a mixed methods feasibility study Smith, Benjamin E. Hendrick, Paul Bateman, Marcus Moffatt, Fiona Rathleff, Michael Skovdal Selfe, James Smith, Toby O. Logan, Pip BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: A novel loaded self-managed exercise programme that includes pain education and self-management strategies may result in better outcomes for people with patellofemoral pain (PFP). However, establishing program feasibility is an essential first step before testing efficacy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of conducting a definitive RCT which will evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a loaded self-managed exercise programme for people with PFP compared with usual physiotherapy. METHODS: In a mixed methods, pragmatic, randomised controlled feasibility study, 60 participants with PFP (57% female; mean age 29 years) were recruited from a physiotherapy clinic within a large UK teaching hospital. They were randomly allocated to receive either a loaded self-managed exercise programme (n = 30) or usual physiotherapy (n = 30). Feasibility indicators of process, resources, and management were collected through follow-up of standardised questionnaires six months after recruitment and semi-structured interviews with 20 participants and physiotherapists. RESULTS: Recruitment rate was 5 participants per month; consent rate was 99%; adherence to intervention appointments was 87%; completeness of questionnaire data was 100%; and adherence to intervention delivery was 95%. Three exercise diaries were returned at six months (5%). At six months, 25 questionnaire booklets were returned (9 in the loaded self-managed group, 16 in the usual physiotherapy group), with a total retention rate of 42%. At six months, 56% (5/9) of respondents in the loaded self-managed group and 56% (9/16) in the usual physiotherapy group were classified as ‘recovered’. Both groups demonstrated improvements in average pain (VAS), kinesiophobia, pain catastrophizing, general self-efficacy and EQ-5D-5 L from baseline to six months. CONCLUSION: The results of this feasibility study confirm that it is feasible and acceptable to deliver a loaded self-managed exercise programme to adults with PFP in an NHS physiotherapy outpatient setting. However, between group differences in lost to follow up and poor exercise diary completion mean we are uncertain on some feasibility aspects. These methodological issues need addressing prior to conducting a definitive RCT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN 35272486. Registered 19th December 2016. BioMed Central 2019-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6438027/ /pubmed/30917806 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2516-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Smith, Benjamin E.
Hendrick, Paul
Bateman, Marcus
Moffatt, Fiona
Rathleff, Michael Skovdal
Selfe, James
Smith, Toby O.
Logan, Pip
A loaded self-managed exercise programme for patellofemoral pain: a mixed methods feasibility study
title A loaded self-managed exercise programme for patellofemoral pain: a mixed methods feasibility study
title_full A loaded self-managed exercise programme for patellofemoral pain: a mixed methods feasibility study
title_fullStr A loaded self-managed exercise programme for patellofemoral pain: a mixed methods feasibility study
title_full_unstemmed A loaded self-managed exercise programme for patellofemoral pain: a mixed methods feasibility study
title_short A loaded self-managed exercise programme for patellofemoral pain: a mixed methods feasibility study
title_sort loaded self-managed exercise programme for patellofemoral pain: a mixed methods feasibility study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6438027/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30917806
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2516-1
work_keys_str_mv AT smithbenjamine aloadedselfmanagedexerciseprogrammeforpatellofemoralpainamixedmethodsfeasibilitystudy
AT hendrickpaul aloadedselfmanagedexerciseprogrammeforpatellofemoralpainamixedmethodsfeasibilitystudy
AT batemanmarcus aloadedselfmanagedexerciseprogrammeforpatellofemoralpainamixedmethodsfeasibilitystudy
AT moffattfiona aloadedselfmanagedexerciseprogrammeforpatellofemoralpainamixedmethodsfeasibilitystudy
AT rathleffmichaelskovdal aloadedselfmanagedexerciseprogrammeforpatellofemoralpainamixedmethodsfeasibilitystudy
AT selfejames aloadedselfmanagedexerciseprogrammeforpatellofemoralpainamixedmethodsfeasibilitystudy
AT smithtobyo aloadedselfmanagedexerciseprogrammeforpatellofemoralpainamixedmethodsfeasibilitystudy
AT loganpip aloadedselfmanagedexerciseprogrammeforpatellofemoralpainamixedmethodsfeasibilitystudy
AT smithbenjamine loadedselfmanagedexerciseprogrammeforpatellofemoralpainamixedmethodsfeasibilitystudy
AT hendrickpaul loadedselfmanagedexerciseprogrammeforpatellofemoralpainamixedmethodsfeasibilitystudy
AT batemanmarcus loadedselfmanagedexerciseprogrammeforpatellofemoralpainamixedmethodsfeasibilitystudy
AT moffattfiona loadedselfmanagedexerciseprogrammeforpatellofemoralpainamixedmethodsfeasibilitystudy
AT rathleffmichaelskovdal loadedselfmanagedexerciseprogrammeforpatellofemoralpainamixedmethodsfeasibilitystudy
AT selfejames loadedselfmanagedexerciseprogrammeforpatellofemoralpainamixedmethodsfeasibilitystudy
AT smithtobyo loadedselfmanagedexerciseprogrammeforpatellofemoralpainamixedmethodsfeasibilitystudy
AT loganpip loadedselfmanagedexerciseprogrammeforpatellofemoralpainamixedmethodsfeasibilitystudy