Cargando…
A loaded self-managed exercise programme for patellofemoral pain: a mixed methods feasibility study
BACKGROUND: A novel loaded self-managed exercise programme that includes pain education and self-management strategies may result in better outcomes for people with patellofemoral pain (PFP). However, establishing program feasibility is an essential first step before testing efficacy. The purpose of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6438027/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30917806 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2516-1 |
_version_ | 1783407044197351424 |
---|---|
author | Smith, Benjamin E. Hendrick, Paul Bateman, Marcus Moffatt, Fiona Rathleff, Michael Skovdal Selfe, James Smith, Toby O. Logan, Pip |
author_facet | Smith, Benjamin E. Hendrick, Paul Bateman, Marcus Moffatt, Fiona Rathleff, Michael Skovdal Selfe, James Smith, Toby O. Logan, Pip |
author_sort | Smith, Benjamin E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A novel loaded self-managed exercise programme that includes pain education and self-management strategies may result in better outcomes for people with patellofemoral pain (PFP). However, establishing program feasibility is an essential first step before testing efficacy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of conducting a definitive RCT which will evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a loaded self-managed exercise programme for people with PFP compared with usual physiotherapy. METHODS: In a mixed methods, pragmatic, randomised controlled feasibility study, 60 participants with PFP (57% female; mean age 29 years) were recruited from a physiotherapy clinic within a large UK teaching hospital. They were randomly allocated to receive either a loaded self-managed exercise programme (n = 30) or usual physiotherapy (n = 30). Feasibility indicators of process, resources, and management were collected through follow-up of standardised questionnaires six months after recruitment and semi-structured interviews with 20 participants and physiotherapists. RESULTS: Recruitment rate was 5 participants per month; consent rate was 99%; adherence to intervention appointments was 87%; completeness of questionnaire data was 100%; and adherence to intervention delivery was 95%. Three exercise diaries were returned at six months (5%). At six months, 25 questionnaire booklets were returned (9 in the loaded self-managed group, 16 in the usual physiotherapy group), with a total retention rate of 42%. At six months, 56% (5/9) of respondents in the loaded self-managed group and 56% (9/16) in the usual physiotherapy group were classified as ‘recovered’. Both groups demonstrated improvements in average pain (VAS), kinesiophobia, pain catastrophizing, general self-efficacy and EQ-5D-5 L from baseline to six months. CONCLUSION: The results of this feasibility study confirm that it is feasible and acceptable to deliver a loaded self-managed exercise programme to adults with PFP in an NHS physiotherapy outpatient setting. However, between group differences in lost to follow up and poor exercise diary completion mean we are uncertain on some feasibility aspects. These methodological issues need addressing prior to conducting a definitive RCT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN 35272486. Registered 19th December 2016. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6438027 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64380272019-04-08 A loaded self-managed exercise programme for patellofemoral pain: a mixed methods feasibility study Smith, Benjamin E. Hendrick, Paul Bateman, Marcus Moffatt, Fiona Rathleff, Michael Skovdal Selfe, James Smith, Toby O. Logan, Pip BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: A novel loaded self-managed exercise programme that includes pain education and self-management strategies may result in better outcomes for people with patellofemoral pain (PFP). However, establishing program feasibility is an essential first step before testing efficacy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of conducting a definitive RCT which will evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a loaded self-managed exercise programme for people with PFP compared with usual physiotherapy. METHODS: In a mixed methods, pragmatic, randomised controlled feasibility study, 60 participants with PFP (57% female; mean age 29 years) were recruited from a physiotherapy clinic within a large UK teaching hospital. They were randomly allocated to receive either a loaded self-managed exercise programme (n = 30) or usual physiotherapy (n = 30). Feasibility indicators of process, resources, and management were collected through follow-up of standardised questionnaires six months after recruitment and semi-structured interviews with 20 participants and physiotherapists. RESULTS: Recruitment rate was 5 participants per month; consent rate was 99%; adherence to intervention appointments was 87%; completeness of questionnaire data was 100%; and adherence to intervention delivery was 95%. Three exercise diaries were returned at six months (5%). At six months, 25 questionnaire booklets were returned (9 in the loaded self-managed group, 16 in the usual physiotherapy group), with a total retention rate of 42%. At six months, 56% (5/9) of respondents in the loaded self-managed group and 56% (9/16) in the usual physiotherapy group were classified as ‘recovered’. Both groups demonstrated improvements in average pain (VAS), kinesiophobia, pain catastrophizing, general self-efficacy and EQ-5D-5 L from baseline to six months. CONCLUSION: The results of this feasibility study confirm that it is feasible and acceptable to deliver a loaded self-managed exercise programme to adults with PFP in an NHS physiotherapy outpatient setting. However, between group differences in lost to follow up and poor exercise diary completion mean we are uncertain on some feasibility aspects. These methodological issues need addressing prior to conducting a definitive RCT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN 35272486. Registered 19th December 2016. BioMed Central 2019-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6438027/ /pubmed/30917806 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2516-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Smith, Benjamin E. Hendrick, Paul Bateman, Marcus Moffatt, Fiona Rathleff, Michael Skovdal Selfe, James Smith, Toby O. Logan, Pip A loaded self-managed exercise programme for patellofemoral pain: a mixed methods feasibility study |
title | A loaded self-managed exercise programme for patellofemoral pain: a mixed methods feasibility study |
title_full | A loaded self-managed exercise programme for patellofemoral pain: a mixed methods feasibility study |
title_fullStr | A loaded self-managed exercise programme for patellofemoral pain: a mixed methods feasibility study |
title_full_unstemmed | A loaded self-managed exercise programme for patellofemoral pain: a mixed methods feasibility study |
title_short | A loaded self-managed exercise programme for patellofemoral pain: a mixed methods feasibility study |
title_sort | loaded self-managed exercise programme for patellofemoral pain: a mixed methods feasibility study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6438027/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30917806 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2516-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT smithbenjamine aloadedselfmanagedexerciseprogrammeforpatellofemoralpainamixedmethodsfeasibilitystudy AT hendrickpaul aloadedselfmanagedexerciseprogrammeforpatellofemoralpainamixedmethodsfeasibilitystudy AT batemanmarcus aloadedselfmanagedexerciseprogrammeforpatellofemoralpainamixedmethodsfeasibilitystudy AT moffattfiona aloadedselfmanagedexerciseprogrammeforpatellofemoralpainamixedmethodsfeasibilitystudy AT rathleffmichaelskovdal aloadedselfmanagedexerciseprogrammeforpatellofemoralpainamixedmethodsfeasibilitystudy AT selfejames aloadedselfmanagedexerciseprogrammeforpatellofemoralpainamixedmethodsfeasibilitystudy AT smithtobyo aloadedselfmanagedexerciseprogrammeforpatellofemoralpainamixedmethodsfeasibilitystudy AT loganpip aloadedselfmanagedexerciseprogrammeforpatellofemoralpainamixedmethodsfeasibilitystudy AT smithbenjamine loadedselfmanagedexerciseprogrammeforpatellofemoralpainamixedmethodsfeasibilitystudy AT hendrickpaul loadedselfmanagedexerciseprogrammeforpatellofemoralpainamixedmethodsfeasibilitystudy AT batemanmarcus loadedselfmanagedexerciseprogrammeforpatellofemoralpainamixedmethodsfeasibilitystudy AT moffattfiona loadedselfmanagedexerciseprogrammeforpatellofemoralpainamixedmethodsfeasibilitystudy AT rathleffmichaelskovdal loadedselfmanagedexerciseprogrammeforpatellofemoralpainamixedmethodsfeasibilitystudy AT selfejames loadedselfmanagedexerciseprogrammeforpatellofemoralpainamixedmethodsfeasibilitystudy AT smithtobyo loadedselfmanagedexerciseprogrammeforpatellofemoralpainamixedmethodsfeasibilitystudy AT loganpip loadedselfmanagedexerciseprogrammeforpatellofemoralpainamixedmethodsfeasibilitystudy |