Cargando…
Coverage probability analysis of three uplink power control schemes: Stochastic geometry approach
In cellular networks, each mobile station adjusts its power level under control of its base station, i.e., through uplink transmit power control, which is essential to reach desired signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) at the base station and to limit inter-cell interference. The optimal l...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6438601/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30996724 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13638-018-1120-7 |
_version_ | 1783407128672731136 |
---|---|
author | Herath, Prasanna Tellambura, Chintha Krzymień, Witold A. |
author_facet | Herath, Prasanna Tellambura, Chintha Krzymień, Witold A. |
author_sort | Herath, Prasanna |
collection | PubMed |
description | In cellular networks, each mobile station adjusts its power level under control of its base station, i.e., through uplink transmit power control, which is essential to reach desired signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) at the base station and to limit inter-cell interference. The optimal levels of transmit power in a network depend on path loss, shadowing, and multipath fading, as well as the network configuration. However, since path loss is distance dependent and the cell association distances are correlated due to the cell association policies, the performance analysis of the uplink transmit power control is very complicated. Consequently, the impact of a specific power control algorithm on network performance is hard to quantify. In this paper, we analyze three uplink transmit power control schemes. We assume the standard power-law path loss and composite Rayleigh-lognormal fading. Using stochastic geometry tools, we derive the cumulative distribution function and the probability density function of the uplink transmit power and the resulting network coverage probability. It is shown that the coverage is highly dependent on the severity of shadowing, the power control scheme, and its parameters, but invariant of the density of deployment of base stations when the shadowing is mild and power control is fractional. At low SINRs, compensation of both path loss and shadowing improves the coverage. However, at high SINRs, compensating for path loss only improves coverage. Increase in the severity of shadowing significantly reduces the coverage. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6438601 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64386012019-04-15 Coverage probability analysis of three uplink power control schemes: Stochastic geometry approach Herath, Prasanna Tellambura, Chintha Krzymień, Witold A. EURASIP J Wirel Commun Netw Research In cellular networks, each mobile station adjusts its power level under control of its base station, i.e., through uplink transmit power control, which is essential to reach desired signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) at the base station and to limit inter-cell interference. The optimal levels of transmit power in a network depend on path loss, shadowing, and multipath fading, as well as the network configuration. However, since path loss is distance dependent and the cell association distances are correlated due to the cell association policies, the performance analysis of the uplink transmit power control is very complicated. Consequently, the impact of a specific power control algorithm on network performance is hard to quantify. In this paper, we analyze three uplink transmit power control schemes. We assume the standard power-law path loss and composite Rayleigh-lognormal fading. Using stochastic geometry tools, we derive the cumulative distribution function and the probability density function of the uplink transmit power and the resulting network coverage probability. It is shown that the coverage is highly dependent on the severity of shadowing, the power control scheme, and its parameters, but invariant of the density of deployment of base stations when the shadowing is mild and power control is fractional. At low SINRs, compensation of both path loss and shadowing improves the coverage. However, at high SINRs, compensating for path loss only improves coverage. Increase in the severity of shadowing significantly reduces the coverage. Springer International Publishing 2018-06-07 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6438601/ /pubmed/30996724 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13638-018-1120-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Herath, Prasanna Tellambura, Chintha Krzymień, Witold A. Coverage probability analysis of three uplink power control schemes: Stochastic geometry approach |
title | Coverage probability analysis of three uplink power control schemes: Stochastic geometry approach |
title_full | Coverage probability analysis of three uplink power control schemes: Stochastic geometry approach |
title_fullStr | Coverage probability analysis of three uplink power control schemes: Stochastic geometry approach |
title_full_unstemmed | Coverage probability analysis of three uplink power control schemes: Stochastic geometry approach |
title_short | Coverage probability analysis of three uplink power control schemes: Stochastic geometry approach |
title_sort | coverage probability analysis of three uplink power control schemes: stochastic geometry approach |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6438601/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30996724 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13638-018-1120-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT herathprasanna coverageprobabilityanalysisofthreeuplinkpowercontrolschemesstochasticgeometryapproach AT tellamburachintha coverageprobabilityanalysisofthreeuplinkpowercontrolschemesstochasticgeometryapproach AT krzymienwitolda coverageprobabilityanalysisofthreeuplinkpowercontrolschemesstochasticgeometryapproach |