Cargando…

Coverage probability analysis of three uplink power control schemes: Stochastic geometry approach

In cellular networks, each mobile station adjusts its power level under control of its base station, i.e., through uplink transmit power control, which is essential to reach desired signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) at the base station and to limit inter-cell interference. The optimal l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Herath, Prasanna, Tellambura, Chintha, Krzymień, Witold A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6438601/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30996724
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13638-018-1120-7
_version_ 1783407128672731136
author Herath, Prasanna
Tellambura, Chintha
Krzymień, Witold A.
author_facet Herath, Prasanna
Tellambura, Chintha
Krzymień, Witold A.
author_sort Herath, Prasanna
collection PubMed
description In cellular networks, each mobile station adjusts its power level under control of its base station, i.e., through uplink transmit power control, which is essential to reach desired signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) at the base station and to limit inter-cell interference. The optimal levels of transmit power in a network depend on path loss, shadowing, and multipath fading, as well as the network configuration. However, since path loss is distance dependent and the cell association distances are correlated due to the cell association policies, the performance analysis of the uplink transmit power control is very complicated. Consequently, the impact of a specific power control algorithm on network performance is hard to quantify. In this paper, we analyze three uplink transmit power control schemes. We assume the standard power-law path loss and composite Rayleigh-lognormal fading. Using stochastic geometry tools, we derive the cumulative distribution function and the probability density function of the uplink transmit power and the resulting network coverage probability. It is shown that the coverage is highly dependent on the severity of shadowing, the power control scheme, and its parameters, but invariant of the density of deployment of base stations when the shadowing is mild and power control is fractional. At low SINRs, compensation of both path loss and shadowing improves the coverage. However, at high SINRs, compensating for path loss only improves coverage. Increase in the severity of shadowing significantly reduces the coverage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6438601
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64386012019-04-15 Coverage probability analysis of three uplink power control schemes: Stochastic geometry approach Herath, Prasanna Tellambura, Chintha Krzymień, Witold A. EURASIP J Wirel Commun Netw Research In cellular networks, each mobile station adjusts its power level under control of its base station, i.e., through uplink transmit power control, which is essential to reach desired signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) at the base station and to limit inter-cell interference. The optimal levels of transmit power in a network depend on path loss, shadowing, and multipath fading, as well as the network configuration. However, since path loss is distance dependent and the cell association distances are correlated due to the cell association policies, the performance analysis of the uplink transmit power control is very complicated. Consequently, the impact of a specific power control algorithm on network performance is hard to quantify. In this paper, we analyze three uplink transmit power control schemes. We assume the standard power-law path loss and composite Rayleigh-lognormal fading. Using stochastic geometry tools, we derive the cumulative distribution function and the probability density function of the uplink transmit power and the resulting network coverage probability. It is shown that the coverage is highly dependent on the severity of shadowing, the power control scheme, and its parameters, but invariant of the density of deployment of base stations when the shadowing is mild and power control is fractional. At low SINRs, compensation of both path loss and shadowing improves the coverage. However, at high SINRs, compensating for path loss only improves coverage. Increase in the severity of shadowing significantly reduces the coverage. Springer International Publishing 2018-06-07 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6438601/ /pubmed/30996724 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13638-018-1120-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Herath, Prasanna
Tellambura, Chintha
Krzymień, Witold A.
Coverage probability analysis of three uplink power control schemes: Stochastic geometry approach
title Coverage probability analysis of three uplink power control schemes: Stochastic geometry approach
title_full Coverage probability analysis of three uplink power control schemes: Stochastic geometry approach
title_fullStr Coverage probability analysis of three uplink power control schemes: Stochastic geometry approach
title_full_unstemmed Coverage probability analysis of three uplink power control schemes: Stochastic geometry approach
title_short Coverage probability analysis of three uplink power control schemes: Stochastic geometry approach
title_sort coverage probability analysis of three uplink power control schemes: stochastic geometry approach
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6438601/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30996724
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13638-018-1120-7
work_keys_str_mv AT herathprasanna coverageprobabilityanalysisofthreeuplinkpowercontrolschemesstochasticgeometryapproach
AT tellamburachintha coverageprobabilityanalysisofthreeuplinkpowercontrolschemesstochasticgeometryapproach
AT krzymienwitolda coverageprobabilityanalysisofthreeuplinkpowercontrolschemesstochasticgeometryapproach