Cargando…

Projected heat stress challenges and abatement opportunities for U.S. milk production

Cost-effective heat mitigation strategies are imperative for maintaining milk production and dairy farm profitability in the U.S. with projected climate change. This study investigated the cost-effectiveness of four heat abatement strategies, including Minimal (open barn or shading), Moderate (force...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gunn, Kpoti M., Holly, Michael A., Veith, Tamie L., Buda, Anthony R., Prasad, Rishi, Rotz, C. Alan, Soder, Kathy J., Stoner, Anne M. K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6438606/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30921450
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214665
_version_ 1783407129815678976
author Gunn, Kpoti M.
Holly, Michael A.
Veith, Tamie L.
Buda, Anthony R.
Prasad, Rishi
Rotz, C. Alan
Soder, Kathy J.
Stoner, Anne M. K.
author_facet Gunn, Kpoti M.
Holly, Michael A.
Veith, Tamie L.
Buda, Anthony R.
Prasad, Rishi
Rotz, C. Alan
Soder, Kathy J.
Stoner, Anne M. K.
author_sort Gunn, Kpoti M.
collection PubMed
description Cost-effective heat mitigation strategies are imperative for maintaining milk production and dairy farm profitability in the U.S. with projected climate change. This study investigated the cost-effectiveness of four heat abatement strategies, including Minimal (open barn or shading), Moderate (forced ventilation), High (fans and misting), and Intense (air conditioning). Heat stress and subsequent impacts on milk production per cow were predicted across nine climatic regions in the U.S. for early (2015 to 2034), mid (2045 to 2064) and late (2081 to 2100) 21(st) century, using downscaled climate projections. Heat abatements were used to adjust predicted milk production losses and illustrate the potential to reduce milk production losses due to heat stress. Economic analysis included a cost-benefit ratio calculation associated with the implementation of each heat abatement. Results showed that milk production losses were expected to accelerate across the U.S. at a mean rate of 174±7 kg/cow/decade, with the fastest rate in the Southeast region. Relative to Minimal heat abatement, Moderate, High, and Intense heat abatements increased annual milk production per cow by 3%, 4%, and 6% during early-21(st) century, 3%, 6%, and 11% during mid-21(st) century, and 3%, 8%, and 21% during late-21(st) century, respectively. The cost effectiveness of different heat abatement strategies generally increased with subsequently stronger heat abatements. In mid- and late-21(st) century, mean annual net values of High and Intense heat stress abatement implementation approached -$30 to $190 /cow and -$20 to $590 /cow, respectively, with the largest net annual benefit in late-21(st) century under Intense abatement. Findings from the study demonstrate the value of using downscaled climate projections to shed light on local and regional strategies to abate heat stress on cattle and mitigate potential milk production losses due to climate change.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6438606
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64386062019-04-12 Projected heat stress challenges and abatement opportunities for U.S. milk production Gunn, Kpoti M. Holly, Michael A. Veith, Tamie L. Buda, Anthony R. Prasad, Rishi Rotz, C. Alan Soder, Kathy J. Stoner, Anne M. K. PLoS One Research Article Cost-effective heat mitigation strategies are imperative for maintaining milk production and dairy farm profitability in the U.S. with projected climate change. This study investigated the cost-effectiveness of four heat abatement strategies, including Minimal (open barn or shading), Moderate (forced ventilation), High (fans and misting), and Intense (air conditioning). Heat stress and subsequent impacts on milk production per cow were predicted across nine climatic regions in the U.S. for early (2015 to 2034), mid (2045 to 2064) and late (2081 to 2100) 21(st) century, using downscaled climate projections. Heat abatements were used to adjust predicted milk production losses and illustrate the potential to reduce milk production losses due to heat stress. Economic analysis included a cost-benefit ratio calculation associated with the implementation of each heat abatement. Results showed that milk production losses were expected to accelerate across the U.S. at a mean rate of 174±7 kg/cow/decade, with the fastest rate in the Southeast region. Relative to Minimal heat abatement, Moderate, High, and Intense heat abatements increased annual milk production per cow by 3%, 4%, and 6% during early-21(st) century, 3%, 6%, and 11% during mid-21(st) century, and 3%, 8%, and 21% during late-21(st) century, respectively. The cost effectiveness of different heat abatement strategies generally increased with subsequently stronger heat abatements. In mid- and late-21(st) century, mean annual net values of High and Intense heat stress abatement implementation approached -$30 to $190 /cow and -$20 to $590 /cow, respectively, with the largest net annual benefit in late-21(st) century under Intense abatement. Findings from the study demonstrate the value of using downscaled climate projections to shed light on local and regional strategies to abate heat stress on cattle and mitigate potential milk production losses due to climate change. Public Library of Science 2019-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6438606/ /pubmed/30921450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214665 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gunn, Kpoti M.
Holly, Michael A.
Veith, Tamie L.
Buda, Anthony R.
Prasad, Rishi
Rotz, C. Alan
Soder, Kathy J.
Stoner, Anne M. K.
Projected heat stress challenges and abatement opportunities for U.S. milk production
title Projected heat stress challenges and abatement opportunities for U.S. milk production
title_full Projected heat stress challenges and abatement opportunities for U.S. milk production
title_fullStr Projected heat stress challenges and abatement opportunities for U.S. milk production
title_full_unstemmed Projected heat stress challenges and abatement opportunities for U.S. milk production
title_short Projected heat stress challenges and abatement opportunities for U.S. milk production
title_sort projected heat stress challenges and abatement opportunities for u.s. milk production
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6438606/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30921450
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214665
work_keys_str_mv AT gunnkpotim projectedheatstresschallengesandabatementopportunitiesforusmilkproduction
AT hollymichaela projectedheatstresschallengesandabatementopportunitiesforusmilkproduction
AT veithtamiel projectedheatstresschallengesandabatementopportunitiesforusmilkproduction
AT budaanthonyr projectedheatstresschallengesandabatementopportunitiesforusmilkproduction
AT prasadrishi projectedheatstresschallengesandabatementopportunitiesforusmilkproduction
AT rotzcalan projectedheatstresschallengesandabatementopportunitiesforusmilkproduction
AT soderkathyj projectedheatstresschallengesandabatementopportunitiesforusmilkproduction
AT stonerannemk projectedheatstresschallengesandabatementopportunitiesforusmilkproduction