Cargando…
Projected heat stress challenges and abatement opportunities for U.S. milk production
Cost-effective heat mitigation strategies are imperative for maintaining milk production and dairy farm profitability in the U.S. with projected climate change. This study investigated the cost-effectiveness of four heat abatement strategies, including Minimal (open barn or shading), Moderate (force...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6438606/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30921450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214665 |
_version_ | 1783407129815678976 |
---|---|
author | Gunn, Kpoti M. Holly, Michael A. Veith, Tamie L. Buda, Anthony R. Prasad, Rishi Rotz, C. Alan Soder, Kathy J. Stoner, Anne M. K. |
author_facet | Gunn, Kpoti M. Holly, Michael A. Veith, Tamie L. Buda, Anthony R. Prasad, Rishi Rotz, C. Alan Soder, Kathy J. Stoner, Anne M. K. |
author_sort | Gunn, Kpoti M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cost-effective heat mitigation strategies are imperative for maintaining milk production and dairy farm profitability in the U.S. with projected climate change. This study investigated the cost-effectiveness of four heat abatement strategies, including Minimal (open barn or shading), Moderate (forced ventilation), High (fans and misting), and Intense (air conditioning). Heat stress and subsequent impacts on milk production per cow were predicted across nine climatic regions in the U.S. for early (2015 to 2034), mid (2045 to 2064) and late (2081 to 2100) 21(st) century, using downscaled climate projections. Heat abatements were used to adjust predicted milk production losses and illustrate the potential to reduce milk production losses due to heat stress. Economic analysis included a cost-benefit ratio calculation associated with the implementation of each heat abatement. Results showed that milk production losses were expected to accelerate across the U.S. at a mean rate of 174±7 kg/cow/decade, with the fastest rate in the Southeast region. Relative to Minimal heat abatement, Moderate, High, and Intense heat abatements increased annual milk production per cow by 3%, 4%, and 6% during early-21(st) century, 3%, 6%, and 11% during mid-21(st) century, and 3%, 8%, and 21% during late-21(st) century, respectively. The cost effectiveness of different heat abatement strategies generally increased with subsequently stronger heat abatements. In mid- and late-21(st) century, mean annual net values of High and Intense heat stress abatement implementation approached -$30 to $190 /cow and -$20 to $590 /cow, respectively, with the largest net annual benefit in late-21(st) century under Intense abatement. Findings from the study demonstrate the value of using downscaled climate projections to shed light on local and regional strategies to abate heat stress on cattle and mitigate potential milk production losses due to climate change. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6438606 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64386062019-04-12 Projected heat stress challenges and abatement opportunities for U.S. milk production Gunn, Kpoti M. Holly, Michael A. Veith, Tamie L. Buda, Anthony R. Prasad, Rishi Rotz, C. Alan Soder, Kathy J. Stoner, Anne M. K. PLoS One Research Article Cost-effective heat mitigation strategies are imperative for maintaining milk production and dairy farm profitability in the U.S. with projected climate change. This study investigated the cost-effectiveness of four heat abatement strategies, including Minimal (open barn or shading), Moderate (forced ventilation), High (fans and misting), and Intense (air conditioning). Heat stress and subsequent impacts on milk production per cow were predicted across nine climatic regions in the U.S. for early (2015 to 2034), mid (2045 to 2064) and late (2081 to 2100) 21(st) century, using downscaled climate projections. Heat abatements were used to adjust predicted milk production losses and illustrate the potential to reduce milk production losses due to heat stress. Economic analysis included a cost-benefit ratio calculation associated with the implementation of each heat abatement. Results showed that milk production losses were expected to accelerate across the U.S. at a mean rate of 174±7 kg/cow/decade, with the fastest rate in the Southeast region. Relative to Minimal heat abatement, Moderate, High, and Intense heat abatements increased annual milk production per cow by 3%, 4%, and 6% during early-21(st) century, 3%, 6%, and 11% during mid-21(st) century, and 3%, 8%, and 21% during late-21(st) century, respectively. The cost effectiveness of different heat abatement strategies generally increased with subsequently stronger heat abatements. In mid- and late-21(st) century, mean annual net values of High and Intense heat stress abatement implementation approached -$30 to $190 /cow and -$20 to $590 /cow, respectively, with the largest net annual benefit in late-21(st) century under Intense abatement. Findings from the study demonstrate the value of using downscaled climate projections to shed light on local and regional strategies to abate heat stress on cattle and mitigate potential milk production losses due to climate change. Public Library of Science 2019-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6438606/ /pubmed/30921450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214665 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Gunn, Kpoti M. Holly, Michael A. Veith, Tamie L. Buda, Anthony R. Prasad, Rishi Rotz, C. Alan Soder, Kathy J. Stoner, Anne M. K. Projected heat stress challenges and abatement opportunities for U.S. milk production |
title | Projected heat stress challenges and abatement opportunities for U.S. milk production |
title_full | Projected heat stress challenges and abatement opportunities for U.S. milk production |
title_fullStr | Projected heat stress challenges and abatement opportunities for U.S. milk production |
title_full_unstemmed | Projected heat stress challenges and abatement opportunities for U.S. milk production |
title_short | Projected heat stress challenges and abatement opportunities for U.S. milk production |
title_sort | projected heat stress challenges and abatement opportunities for u.s. milk production |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6438606/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30921450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214665 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gunnkpotim projectedheatstresschallengesandabatementopportunitiesforusmilkproduction AT hollymichaela projectedheatstresschallengesandabatementopportunitiesforusmilkproduction AT veithtamiel projectedheatstresschallengesandabatementopportunitiesforusmilkproduction AT budaanthonyr projectedheatstresschallengesandabatementopportunitiesforusmilkproduction AT prasadrishi projectedheatstresschallengesandabatementopportunitiesforusmilkproduction AT rotzcalan projectedheatstresschallengesandabatementopportunitiesforusmilkproduction AT soderkathyj projectedheatstresschallengesandabatementopportunitiesforusmilkproduction AT stonerannemk projectedheatstresschallengesandabatementopportunitiesforusmilkproduction |