Cargando…
Group ICA for identifying biomarkers in schizophrenia: ‘Adaptive’ networks via spatially constrained ICA show more sensitivity to group differences than spatio-temporal regression
Brain functional networks identified from fMRI data can provide potential biomarkers for brain disorders. Group independent component analysis (GICA) is popular for extracting brain functional networks from multiple subjects. In GICA, different strategies exist for reconstructing subject-specific ne...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6438914/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30921608 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101747 |
_version_ | 1783407170523496448 |
---|---|
author | Salman, Mustafa S. Du, Yuhui Lin, Dongdong Fu, Zening Fedorov, Alex Damaraju, Eswar Sui, Jing Chen, Jiayu Mayer, Andrew R. Posse, Stefan Mathalon, Daniel H. Ford, Judith M. Van Erp, Theodorus Calhoun, Vince D. |
author_facet | Salman, Mustafa S. Du, Yuhui Lin, Dongdong Fu, Zening Fedorov, Alex Damaraju, Eswar Sui, Jing Chen, Jiayu Mayer, Andrew R. Posse, Stefan Mathalon, Daniel H. Ford, Judith M. Van Erp, Theodorus Calhoun, Vince D. |
author_sort | Salman, Mustafa S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Brain functional networks identified from fMRI data can provide potential biomarkers for brain disorders. Group independent component analysis (GICA) is popular for extracting brain functional networks from multiple subjects. In GICA, different strategies exist for reconstructing subject-specific networks from the group-level networks. However, it is unknown whether these strategies have different sensitivities to group differences and abilities in distinguishing patients. Among GICA, spatio-temporal regression (STR) and spatially constrained ICA approaches such as group information guided ICA (GIG-ICA) can be used to propagate components (indicating networks) to a new subject that is not included in the original subjects. In this study, based on the same a priori network maps, we reconstructed subject-specific networks using these two methods separately from resting-state fMRI data of 151 schizophrenia patients (SZs) and 163 healthy controls (HCs). We investigated group differences in the estimated functional networks and the functional network connectivity (FNC) obtained by each method. The networks were also used as features in a cross-validated support vector machine (SVM) for classifying SZs and HCs. We selected features using different strategies to provide a comprehensive comparison between the two methods. GIG-ICA generally showed greater sensitivity in statistical analysis and better classification performance (accuracy 76.45 ± 8.9%, sensitivity 0.74 ± 0.11, specificity 0.79 ± 0.11) than STR (accuracy 67.45 ± 8.13%, sensitivity 0.65 ± 0.11, specificity 0.71 ± 0.11). Importantly, results were also consistent when applied to an independent dataset including 82 HCs and 82 SZs. Our work suggests that the functional networks estimated by GIG-ICA are more sensitive to group differences, and GIG-ICA is promising for identifying image-derived biomarkers of brain disease. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6438914 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64389142019-04-11 Group ICA for identifying biomarkers in schizophrenia: ‘Adaptive’ networks via spatially constrained ICA show more sensitivity to group differences than spatio-temporal regression Salman, Mustafa S. Du, Yuhui Lin, Dongdong Fu, Zening Fedorov, Alex Damaraju, Eswar Sui, Jing Chen, Jiayu Mayer, Andrew R. Posse, Stefan Mathalon, Daniel H. Ford, Judith M. Van Erp, Theodorus Calhoun, Vince D. Neuroimage Clin Regular Article Brain functional networks identified from fMRI data can provide potential biomarkers for brain disorders. Group independent component analysis (GICA) is popular for extracting brain functional networks from multiple subjects. In GICA, different strategies exist for reconstructing subject-specific networks from the group-level networks. However, it is unknown whether these strategies have different sensitivities to group differences and abilities in distinguishing patients. Among GICA, spatio-temporal regression (STR) and spatially constrained ICA approaches such as group information guided ICA (GIG-ICA) can be used to propagate components (indicating networks) to a new subject that is not included in the original subjects. In this study, based on the same a priori network maps, we reconstructed subject-specific networks using these two methods separately from resting-state fMRI data of 151 schizophrenia patients (SZs) and 163 healthy controls (HCs). We investigated group differences in the estimated functional networks and the functional network connectivity (FNC) obtained by each method. The networks were also used as features in a cross-validated support vector machine (SVM) for classifying SZs and HCs. We selected features using different strategies to provide a comprehensive comparison between the two methods. GIG-ICA generally showed greater sensitivity in statistical analysis and better classification performance (accuracy 76.45 ± 8.9%, sensitivity 0.74 ± 0.11, specificity 0.79 ± 0.11) than STR (accuracy 67.45 ± 8.13%, sensitivity 0.65 ± 0.11, specificity 0.71 ± 0.11). Importantly, results were also consistent when applied to an independent dataset including 82 HCs and 82 SZs. Our work suggests that the functional networks estimated by GIG-ICA are more sensitive to group differences, and GIG-ICA is promising for identifying image-derived biomarkers of brain disease. Elsevier 2019-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6438914/ /pubmed/30921608 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101747 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Regular Article Salman, Mustafa S. Du, Yuhui Lin, Dongdong Fu, Zening Fedorov, Alex Damaraju, Eswar Sui, Jing Chen, Jiayu Mayer, Andrew R. Posse, Stefan Mathalon, Daniel H. Ford, Judith M. Van Erp, Theodorus Calhoun, Vince D. Group ICA for identifying biomarkers in schizophrenia: ‘Adaptive’ networks via spatially constrained ICA show more sensitivity to group differences than spatio-temporal regression |
title | Group ICA for identifying biomarkers in schizophrenia: ‘Adaptive’ networks via spatially constrained ICA show more sensitivity to group differences than spatio-temporal regression |
title_full | Group ICA for identifying biomarkers in schizophrenia: ‘Adaptive’ networks via spatially constrained ICA show more sensitivity to group differences than spatio-temporal regression |
title_fullStr | Group ICA for identifying biomarkers in schizophrenia: ‘Adaptive’ networks via spatially constrained ICA show more sensitivity to group differences than spatio-temporal regression |
title_full_unstemmed | Group ICA for identifying biomarkers in schizophrenia: ‘Adaptive’ networks via spatially constrained ICA show more sensitivity to group differences than spatio-temporal regression |
title_short | Group ICA for identifying biomarkers in schizophrenia: ‘Adaptive’ networks via spatially constrained ICA show more sensitivity to group differences than spatio-temporal regression |
title_sort | group ica for identifying biomarkers in schizophrenia: ‘adaptive’ networks via spatially constrained ica show more sensitivity to group differences than spatio-temporal regression |
topic | Regular Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6438914/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30921608 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101747 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT salmanmustafas groupicaforidentifyingbiomarkersinschizophreniaadaptivenetworksviaspatiallyconstrainedicashowmoresensitivitytogroupdifferencesthanspatiotemporalregression AT duyuhui groupicaforidentifyingbiomarkersinschizophreniaadaptivenetworksviaspatiallyconstrainedicashowmoresensitivitytogroupdifferencesthanspatiotemporalregression AT lindongdong groupicaforidentifyingbiomarkersinschizophreniaadaptivenetworksviaspatiallyconstrainedicashowmoresensitivitytogroupdifferencesthanspatiotemporalregression AT fuzening groupicaforidentifyingbiomarkersinschizophreniaadaptivenetworksviaspatiallyconstrainedicashowmoresensitivitytogroupdifferencesthanspatiotemporalregression AT fedorovalex groupicaforidentifyingbiomarkersinschizophreniaadaptivenetworksviaspatiallyconstrainedicashowmoresensitivitytogroupdifferencesthanspatiotemporalregression AT damarajueswar groupicaforidentifyingbiomarkersinschizophreniaadaptivenetworksviaspatiallyconstrainedicashowmoresensitivitytogroupdifferencesthanspatiotemporalregression AT suijing groupicaforidentifyingbiomarkersinschizophreniaadaptivenetworksviaspatiallyconstrainedicashowmoresensitivitytogroupdifferencesthanspatiotemporalregression AT chenjiayu groupicaforidentifyingbiomarkersinschizophreniaadaptivenetworksviaspatiallyconstrainedicashowmoresensitivitytogroupdifferencesthanspatiotemporalregression AT mayerandrewr groupicaforidentifyingbiomarkersinschizophreniaadaptivenetworksviaspatiallyconstrainedicashowmoresensitivitytogroupdifferencesthanspatiotemporalregression AT possestefan groupicaforidentifyingbiomarkersinschizophreniaadaptivenetworksviaspatiallyconstrainedicashowmoresensitivitytogroupdifferencesthanspatiotemporalregression AT mathalondanielh groupicaforidentifyingbiomarkersinschizophreniaadaptivenetworksviaspatiallyconstrainedicashowmoresensitivitytogroupdifferencesthanspatiotemporalregression AT fordjudithm groupicaforidentifyingbiomarkersinschizophreniaadaptivenetworksviaspatiallyconstrainedicashowmoresensitivitytogroupdifferencesthanspatiotemporalregression AT vanerptheodorus groupicaforidentifyingbiomarkersinschizophreniaadaptivenetworksviaspatiallyconstrainedicashowmoresensitivitytogroupdifferencesthanspatiotemporalregression AT calhounvinced groupicaforidentifyingbiomarkersinschizophreniaadaptivenetworksviaspatiallyconstrainedicashowmoresensitivitytogroupdifferencesthanspatiotemporalregression |