Cargando…

Group ICA for identifying biomarkers in schizophrenia: ‘Adaptive’ networks via spatially constrained ICA show more sensitivity to group differences than spatio-temporal regression

Brain functional networks identified from fMRI data can provide potential biomarkers for brain disorders. Group independent component analysis (GICA) is popular for extracting brain functional networks from multiple subjects. In GICA, different strategies exist for reconstructing subject-specific ne...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Salman, Mustafa S., Du, Yuhui, Lin, Dongdong, Fu, Zening, Fedorov, Alex, Damaraju, Eswar, Sui, Jing, Chen, Jiayu, Mayer, Andrew R., Posse, Stefan, Mathalon, Daniel H., Ford, Judith M., Van Erp, Theodorus, Calhoun, Vince D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6438914/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30921608
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101747
_version_ 1783407170523496448
author Salman, Mustafa S.
Du, Yuhui
Lin, Dongdong
Fu, Zening
Fedorov, Alex
Damaraju, Eswar
Sui, Jing
Chen, Jiayu
Mayer, Andrew R.
Posse, Stefan
Mathalon, Daniel H.
Ford, Judith M.
Van Erp, Theodorus
Calhoun, Vince D.
author_facet Salman, Mustafa S.
Du, Yuhui
Lin, Dongdong
Fu, Zening
Fedorov, Alex
Damaraju, Eswar
Sui, Jing
Chen, Jiayu
Mayer, Andrew R.
Posse, Stefan
Mathalon, Daniel H.
Ford, Judith M.
Van Erp, Theodorus
Calhoun, Vince D.
author_sort Salman, Mustafa S.
collection PubMed
description Brain functional networks identified from fMRI data can provide potential biomarkers for brain disorders. Group independent component analysis (GICA) is popular for extracting brain functional networks from multiple subjects. In GICA, different strategies exist for reconstructing subject-specific networks from the group-level networks. However, it is unknown whether these strategies have different sensitivities to group differences and abilities in distinguishing patients. Among GICA, spatio-temporal regression (STR) and spatially constrained ICA approaches such as group information guided ICA (GIG-ICA) can be used to propagate components (indicating networks) to a new subject that is not included in the original subjects. In this study, based on the same a priori network maps, we reconstructed subject-specific networks using these two methods separately from resting-state fMRI data of 151 schizophrenia patients (SZs) and 163 healthy controls (HCs). We investigated group differences in the estimated functional networks and the functional network connectivity (FNC) obtained by each method. The networks were also used as features in a cross-validated support vector machine (SVM) for classifying SZs and HCs. We selected features using different strategies to provide a comprehensive comparison between the two methods. GIG-ICA generally showed greater sensitivity in statistical analysis and better classification performance (accuracy 76.45 ± 8.9%, sensitivity 0.74 ± 0.11, specificity 0.79 ± 0.11) than STR (accuracy 67.45 ± 8.13%, sensitivity 0.65 ± 0.11, specificity 0.71 ± 0.11). Importantly, results were also consistent when applied to an independent dataset including 82 HCs and 82 SZs. Our work suggests that the functional networks estimated by GIG-ICA are more sensitive to group differences, and GIG-ICA is promising for identifying image-derived biomarkers of brain disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6438914
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64389142019-04-11 Group ICA for identifying biomarkers in schizophrenia: ‘Adaptive’ networks via spatially constrained ICA show more sensitivity to group differences than spatio-temporal regression Salman, Mustafa S. Du, Yuhui Lin, Dongdong Fu, Zening Fedorov, Alex Damaraju, Eswar Sui, Jing Chen, Jiayu Mayer, Andrew R. Posse, Stefan Mathalon, Daniel H. Ford, Judith M. Van Erp, Theodorus Calhoun, Vince D. Neuroimage Clin Regular Article Brain functional networks identified from fMRI data can provide potential biomarkers for brain disorders. Group independent component analysis (GICA) is popular for extracting brain functional networks from multiple subjects. In GICA, different strategies exist for reconstructing subject-specific networks from the group-level networks. However, it is unknown whether these strategies have different sensitivities to group differences and abilities in distinguishing patients. Among GICA, spatio-temporal regression (STR) and spatially constrained ICA approaches such as group information guided ICA (GIG-ICA) can be used to propagate components (indicating networks) to a new subject that is not included in the original subjects. In this study, based on the same a priori network maps, we reconstructed subject-specific networks using these two methods separately from resting-state fMRI data of 151 schizophrenia patients (SZs) and 163 healthy controls (HCs). We investigated group differences in the estimated functional networks and the functional network connectivity (FNC) obtained by each method. The networks were also used as features in a cross-validated support vector machine (SVM) for classifying SZs and HCs. We selected features using different strategies to provide a comprehensive comparison between the two methods. GIG-ICA generally showed greater sensitivity in statistical analysis and better classification performance (accuracy 76.45 ± 8.9%, sensitivity 0.74 ± 0.11, specificity 0.79 ± 0.11) than STR (accuracy 67.45 ± 8.13%, sensitivity 0.65 ± 0.11, specificity 0.71 ± 0.11). Importantly, results were also consistent when applied to an independent dataset including 82 HCs and 82 SZs. Our work suggests that the functional networks estimated by GIG-ICA are more sensitive to group differences, and GIG-ICA is promising for identifying image-derived biomarkers of brain disease. Elsevier 2019-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6438914/ /pubmed/30921608 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101747 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Regular Article
Salman, Mustafa S.
Du, Yuhui
Lin, Dongdong
Fu, Zening
Fedorov, Alex
Damaraju, Eswar
Sui, Jing
Chen, Jiayu
Mayer, Andrew R.
Posse, Stefan
Mathalon, Daniel H.
Ford, Judith M.
Van Erp, Theodorus
Calhoun, Vince D.
Group ICA for identifying biomarkers in schizophrenia: ‘Adaptive’ networks via spatially constrained ICA show more sensitivity to group differences than spatio-temporal regression
title Group ICA for identifying biomarkers in schizophrenia: ‘Adaptive’ networks via spatially constrained ICA show more sensitivity to group differences than spatio-temporal regression
title_full Group ICA for identifying biomarkers in schizophrenia: ‘Adaptive’ networks via spatially constrained ICA show more sensitivity to group differences than spatio-temporal regression
title_fullStr Group ICA for identifying biomarkers in schizophrenia: ‘Adaptive’ networks via spatially constrained ICA show more sensitivity to group differences than spatio-temporal regression
title_full_unstemmed Group ICA for identifying biomarkers in schizophrenia: ‘Adaptive’ networks via spatially constrained ICA show more sensitivity to group differences than spatio-temporal regression
title_short Group ICA for identifying biomarkers in schizophrenia: ‘Adaptive’ networks via spatially constrained ICA show more sensitivity to group differences than spatio-temporal regression
title_sort group ica for identifying biomarkers in schizophrenia: ‘adaptive’ networks via spatially constrained ica show more sensitivity to group differences than spatio-temporal regression
topic Regular Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6438914/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30921608
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101747
work_keys_str_mv AT salmanmustafas groupicaforidentifyingbiomarkersinschizophreniaadaptivenetworksviaspatiallyconstrainedicashowmoresensitivitytogroupdifferencesthanspatiotemporalregression
AT duyuhui groupicaforidentifyingbiomarkersinschizophreniaadaptivenetworksviaspatiallyconstrainedicashowmoresensitivitytogroupdifferencesthanspatiotemporalregression
AT lindongdong groupicaforidentifyingbiomarkersinschizophreniaadaptivenetworksviaspatiallyconstrainedicashowmoresensitivitytogroupdifferencesthanspatiotemporalregression
AT fuzening groupicaforidentifyingbiomarkersinschizophreniaadaptivenetworksviaspatiallyconstrainedicashowmoresensitivitytogroupdifferencesthanspatiotemporalregression
AT fedorovalex groupicaforidentifyingbiomarkersinschizophreniaadaptivenetworksviaspatiallyconstrainedicashowmoresensitivitytogroupdifferencesthanspatiotemporalregression
AT damarajueswar groupicaforidentifyingbiomarkersinschizophreniaadaptivenetworksviaspatiallyconstrainedicashowmoresensitivitytogroupdifferencesthanspatiotemporalregression
AT suijing groupicaforidentifyingbiomarkersinschizophreniaadaptivenetworksviaspatiallyconstrainedicashowmoresensitivitytogroupdifferencesthanspatiotemporalregression
AT chenjiayu groupicaforidentifyingbiomarkersinschizophreniaadaptivenetworksviaspatiallyconstrainedicashowmoresensitivitytogroupdifferencesthanspatiotemporalregression
AT mayerandrewr groupicaforidentifyingbiomarkersinschizophreniaadaptivenetworksviaspatiallyconstrainedicashowmoresensitivitytogroupdifferencesthanspatiotemporalregression
AT possestefan groupicaforidentifyingbiomarkersinschizophreniaadaptivenetworksviaspatiallyconstrainedicashowmoresensitivitytogroupdifferencesthanspatiotemporalregression
AT mathalondanielh groupicaforidentifyingbiomarkersinschizophreniaadaptivenetworksviaspatiallyconstrainedicashowmoresensitivitytogroupdifferencesthanspatiotemporalregression
AT fordjudithm groupicaforidentifyingbiomarkersinschizophreniaadaptivenetworksviaspatiallyconstrainedicashowmoresensitivitytogroupdifferencesthanspatiotemporalregression
AT vanerptheodorus groupicaforidentifyingbiomarkersinschizophreniaadaptivenetworksviaspatiallyconstrainedicashowmoresensitivitytogroupdifferencesthanspatiotemporalregression
AT calhounvinced groupicaforidentifyingbiomarkersinschizophreniaadaptivenetworksviaspatiallyconstrainedicashowmoresensitivitytogroupdifferencesthanspatiotemporalregression