Cargando…

National consensus recommendations on patient-centered care for ductal carcinoma in situ

PURPOSE: The purpose of this research was to generate recommendations on strategies to achieve patient-centered care (PCC) for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). METHODS: Thirty clinicians (surgeons, medical/radiation oncologists, radiologists, nurses, navigators) who manage DCIS and 32 DCIS survivors...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gagliardi, Anna R., Wright, Frances C., Look Hong, Nicole J., Groot, Gary, Helyer, Lucy, Meiers, Pamela, Quan, May Lynn, Urquhart, Robin, Warburton, Rebecca
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6438938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30627960
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-019-05132-z
_version_ 1783407176261304320
author Gagliardi, Anna R.
Wright, Frances C.
Look Hong, Nicole J.
Groot, Gary
Helyer, Lucy
Meiers, Pamela
Quan, May Lynn
Urquhart, Robin
Warburton, Rebecca
author_facet Gagliardi, Anna R.
Wright, Frances C.
Look Hong, Nicole J.
Groot, Gary
Helyer, Lucy
Meiers, Pamela
Quan, May Lynn
Urquhart, Robin
Warburton, Rebecca
author_sort Gagliardi, Anna R.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of this research was to generate recommendations on strategies to achieve patient-centered care (PCC) for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). METHODS: Thirty clinicians (surgeons, medical/radiation oncologists, radiologists, nurses, navigators) who manage DCIS and 32 DCIS survivors aged 18 or older were nominated. Forty-six recommendations to support PCC for DCIS were derived from primary research, and rated in a two-round Delphi process from March to June 2018. RESULTS: A total of 29 clinicians and 27 women completed Round One, and 28 clinicians and 22 women completed Round Two. The 29 recommendations retained by both women and clinicians reflected the PCC domains of fostering patient–physician relationship (5), exchanging information (5), responding to emotions (1), managing uncertainty (4), making decisions (9), and enabling patient self-management (5). An additional 13 recommendations were retained by women only: fostering patient–physician relationship (1), exchanging information (3), responding to emotions (2), making decisions (3), and enabling patient self-management (4). Some recommendations refer to processes (i.e., ask questions about lifestyle or views about risks/outcomes to understand patient preferences); others to tools (i.e., communication aid). Panelists recommended a separate consensus process to refine the language that clinicians use when describing DCIS. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to generate guidance on how to achieve PCC for DCIS. Organizations that deliver or oversee health care can use these recommendations on PCC for DCIS to plan, evaluate, or improve services. Ongoing research is needed to develop communication tools, and establish labels and language for DCIS that optimize communication. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10549-019-05132-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6438938
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64389382019-04-15 National consensus recommendations on patient-centered care for ductal carcinoma in situ Gagliardi, Anna R. Wright, Frances C. Look Hong, Nicole J. Groot, Gary Helyer, Lucy Meiers, Pamela Quan, May Lynn Urquhart, Robin Warburton, Rebecca Breast Cancer Res Treat Review PURPOSE: The purpose of this research was to generate recommendations on strategies to achieve patient-centered care (PCC) for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). METHODS: Thirty clinicians (surgeons, medical/radiation oncologists, radiologists, nurses, navigators) who manage DCIS and 32 DCIS survivors aged 18 or older were nominated. Forty-six recommendations to support PCC for DCIS were derived from primary research, and rated in a two-round Delphi process from March to June 2018. RESULTS: A total of 29 clinicians and 27 women completed Round One, and 28 clinicians and 22 women completed Round Two. The 29 recommendations retained by both women and clinicians reflected the PCC domains of fostering patient–physician relationship (5), exchanging information (5), responding to emotions (1), managing uncertainty (4), making decisions (9), and enabling patient self-management (5). An additional 13 recommendations were retained by women only: fostering patient–physician relationship (1), exchanging information (3), responding to emotions (2), making decisions (3), and enabling patient self-management (4). Some recommendations refer to processes (i.e., ask questions about lifestyle or views about risks/outcomes to understand patient preferences); others to tools (i.e., communication aid). Panelists recommended a separate consensus process to refine the language that clinicians use when describing DCIS. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to generate guidance on how to achieve PCC for DCIS. Organizations that deliver or oversee health care can use these recommendations on PCC for DCIS to plan, evaluate, or improve services. Ongoing research is needed to develop communication tools, and establish labels and language for DCIS that optimize communication. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10549-019-05132-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2019-01-09 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6438938/ /pubmed/30627960 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-019-05132-z Text en © The Author(s) 2019 OpenAccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review
Gagliardi, Anna R.
Wright, Frances C.
Look Hong, Nicole J.
Groot, Gary
Helyer, Lucy
Meiers, Pamela
Quan, May Lynn
Urquhart, Robin
Warburton, Rebecca
National consensus recommendations on patient-centered care for ductal carcinoma in situ
title National consensus recommendations on patient-centered care for ductal carcinoma in situ
title_full National consensus recommendations on patient-centered care for ductal carcinoma in situ
title_fullStr National consensus recommendations on patient-centered care for ductal carcinoma in situ
title_full_unstemmed National consensus recommendations on patient-centered care for ductal carcinoma in situ
title_short National consensus recommendations on patient-centered care for ductal carcinoma in situ
title_sort national consensus recommendations on patient-centered care for ductal carcinoma in situ
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6438938/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30627960
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-019-05132-z
work_keys_str_mv AT gagliardiannar nationalconsensusrecommendationsonpatientcenteredcareforductalcarcinomainsitu
AT wrightfrancesc nationalconsensusrecommendationsonpatientcenteredcareforductalcarcinomainsitu
AT lookhongnicolej nationalconsensusrecommendationsonpatientcenteredcareforductalcarcinomainsitu
AT grootgary nationalconsensusrecommendationsonpatientcenteredcareforductalcarcinomainsitu
AT helyerlucy nationalconsensusrecommendationsonpatientcenteredcareforductalcarcinomainsitu
AT meierspamela nationalconsensusrecommendationsonpatientcenteredcareforductalcarcinomainsitu
AT quanmaylynn nationalconsensusrecommendationsonpatientcenteredcareforductalcarcinomainsitu
AT urquhartrobin nationalconsensusrecommendationsonpatientcenteredcareforductalcarcinomainsitu
AT warburtonrebecca nationalconsensusrecommendationsonpatientcenteredcareforductalcarcinomainsitu