Cargando…
National consensus recommendations on patient-centered care for ductal carcinoma in situ
PURPOSE: The purpose of this research was to generate recommendations on strategies to achieve patient-centered care (PCC) for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). METHODS: Thirty clinicians (surgeons, medical/radiation oncologists, radiologists, nurses, navigators) who manage DCIS and 32 DCIS survivors...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6438938/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30627960 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-019-05132-z |
_version_ | 1783407176261304320 |
---|---|
author | Gagliardi, Anna R. Wright, Frances C. Look Hong, Nicole J. Groot, Gary Helyer, Lucy Meiers, Pamela Quan, May Lynn Urquhart, Robin Warburton, Rebecca |
author_facet | Gagliardi, Anna R. Wright, Frances C. Look Hong, Nicole J. Groot, Gary Helyer, Lucy Meiers, Pamela Quan, May Lynn Urquhart, Robin Warburton, Rebecca |
author_sort | Gagliardi, Anna R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The purpose of this research was to generate recommendations on strategies to achieve patient-centered care (PCC) for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). METHODS: Thirty clinicians (surgeons, medical/radiation oncologists, radiologists, nurses, navigators) who manage DCIS and 32 DCIS survivors aged 18 or older were nominated. Forty-six recommendations to support PCC for DCIS were derived from primary research, and rated in a two-round Delphi process from March to June 2018. RESULTS: A total of 29 clinicians and 27 women completed Round One, and 28 clinicians and 22 women completed Round Two. The 29 recommendations retained by both women and clinicians reflected the PCC domains of fostering patient–physician relationship (5), exchanging information (5), responding to emotions (1), managing uncertainty (4), making decisions (9), and enabling patient self-management (5). An additional 13 recommendations were retained by women only: fostering patient–physician relationship (1), exchanging information (3), responding to emotions (2), making decisions (3), and enabling patient self-management (4). Some recommendations refer to processes (i.e., ask questions about lifestyle or views about risks/outcomes to understand patient preferences); others to tools (i.e., communication aid). Panelists recommended a separate consensus process to refine the language that clinicians use when describing DCIS. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to generate guidance on how to achieve PCC for DCIS. Organizations that deliver or oversee health care can use these recommendations on PCC for DCIS to plan, evaluate, or improve services. Ongoing research is needed to develop communication tools, and establish labels and language for DCIS that optimize communication. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10549-019-05132-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6438938 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64389382019-04-15 National consensus recommendations on patient-centered care for ductal carcinoma in situ Gagliardi, Anna R. Wright, Frances C. Look Hong, Nicole J. Groot, Gary Helyer, Lucy Meiers, Pamela Quan, May Lynn Urquhart, Robin Warburton, Rebecca Breast Cancer Res Treat Review PURPOSE: The purpose of this research was to generate recommendations on strategies to achieve patient-centered care (PCC) for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). METHODS: Thirty clinicians (surgeons, medical/radiation oncologists, radiologists, nurses, navigators) who manage DCIS and 32 DCIS survivors aged 18 or older were nominated. Forty-six recommendations to support PCC for DCIS were derived from primary research, and rated in a two-round Delphi process from March to June 2018. RESULTS: A total of 29 clinicians and 27 women completed Round One, and 28 clinicians and 22 women completed Round Two. The 29 recommendations retained by both women and clinicians reflected the PCC domains of fostering patient–physician relationship (5), exchanging information (5), responding to emotions (1), managing uncertainty (4), making decisions (9), and enabling patient self-management (5). An additional 13 recommendations were retained by women only: fostering patient–physician relationship (1), exchanging information (3), responding to emotions (2), making decisions (3), and enabling patient self-management (4). Some recommendations refer to processes (i.e., ask questions about lifestyle or views about risks/outcomes to understand patient preferences); others to tools (i.e., communication aid). Panelists recommended a separate consensus process to refine the language that clinicians use when describing DCIS. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to generate guidance on how to achieve PCC for DCIS. Organizations that deliver or oversee health care can use these recommendations on PCC for DCIS to plan, evaluate, or improve services. Ongoing research is needed to develop communication tools, and establish labels and language for DCIS that optimize communication. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10549-019-05132-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2019-01-09 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6438938/ /pubmed/30627960 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-019-05132-z Text en © The Author(s) 2019 OpenAccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Review Gagliardi, Anna R. Wright, Frances C. Look Hong, Nicole J. Groot, Gary Helyer, Lucy Meiers, Pamela Quan, May Lynn Urquhart, Robin Warburton, Rebecca National consensus recommendations on patient-centered care for ductal carcinoma in situ |
title | National consensus recommendations on patient-centered care for ductal carcinoma in situ |
title_full | National consensus recommendations on patient-centered care for ductal carcinoma in situ |
title_fullStr | National consensus recommendations on patient-centered care for ductal carcinoma in situ |
title_full_unstemmed | National consensus recommendations on patient-centered care for ductal carcinoma in situ |
title_short | National consensus recommendations on patient-centered care for ductal carcinoma in situ |
title_sort | national consensus recommendations on patient-centered care for ductal carcinoma in situ |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6438938/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30627960 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-019-05132-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gagliardiannar nationalconsensusrecommendationsonpatientcenteredcareforductalcarcinomainsitu AT wrightfrancesc nationalconsensusrecommendationsonpatientcenteredcareforductalcarcinomainsitu AT lookhongnicolej nationalconsensusrecommendationsonpatientcenteredcareforductalcarcinomainsitu AT grootgary nationalconsensusrecommendationsonpatientcenteredcareforductalcarcinomainsitu AT helyerlucy nationalconsensusrecommendationsonpatientcenteredcareforductalcarcinomainsitu AT meierspamela nationalconsensusrecommendationsonpatientcenteredcareforductalcarcinomainsitu AT quanmaylynn nationalconsensusrecommendationsonpatientcenteredcareforductalcarcinomainsitu AT urquhartrobin nationalconsensusrecommendationsonpatientcenteredcareforductalcarcinomainsitu AT warburtonrebecca nationalconsensusrecommendationsonpatientcenteredcareforductalcarcinomainsitu |