Cargando…

Graft materials provide greater static strength to medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy than when no graft is included

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the stability of medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO) with and without different graft materials. Good clinical and radiological outcomes have been demonstrated when either using or not using graft materials during MOWHTO. Variation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Belsey, James, Diffo Kaze, Arnaud, Jobson, Simon, Faulkner, James, Maas, Stefan, Khakha, Raghbir, Wilson, Adrian J., Pape, Dietrich
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6439028/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30923931
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-019-0184-6
_version_ 1783407191489773568
author Belsey, James
Diffo Kaze, Arnaud
Jobson, Simon
Faulkner, James
Maas, Stefan
Khakha, Raghbir
Wilson, Adrian J.
Pape, Dietrich
author_facet Belsey, James
Diffo Kaze, Arnaud
Jobson, Simon
Faulkner, James
Maas, Stefan
Khakha, Raghbir
Wilson, Adrian J.
Pape, Dietrich
author_sort Belsey, James
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the stability of medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO) with and without different graft materials. Good clinical and radiological outcomes have been demonstrated when either using or not using graft materials during MOWHTO. Variations in the biomechanical properties of different graft types, regarding the stability they provide a MOWHTO, have not been previously investigated. METHODS: A 10 mm biplanar MOWHTO was performed on 15 artificial sawbone tibiae, which were fixed using the Activmotion 2 plate. Five bones had OSferion60 wedges (synthetic group), five had allograft bone wedges (allograft group), and five had no wedges (control group) inserted into the osteotomy gap. Static compression was applied axially to each specimen until failure of the osteotomy. Ultimate load, horizontal and vertical displacements were measured and used to calculate construct stiffness and valgus malrotation of the tibial head. RESULTS: The synthetic group failed at 6.3 kN, followed by the allograft group (6 kN), and the control group (4.5 kN). The most valgus malrotation of the tibial head was observed in the allograft group (2.6°). The synthetic group showed the highest stiffness at the medial side of the tibial head (9.54 kN·mm(− 1)), but the lowest stiffness at the lateral side (1.59 kN·mm(-1)). The allograft group showed high stiffness on the medial side of the tibial head (7.54 kN·mm(− 1)) as well as the highest stiffness on the lateral side (2.18 kN·mm(− 1)). CONCLUSIONS: The use of graft materials in MOWHTO results in superior material properties compared to the use of no graft. The static strength of MOWHTO is highest when synthetic grafts are inserted into the osteotomy gap. Allograft wedges provide higher mechanical strength to a MOWHTO than when no graft used. In comparison to the synthetic grafts, allograft wedges result in the stiffness of the osteotomy being more similar at the medial and lateral cortices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6439028
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64390282019-04-15 Graft materials provide greater static strength to medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy than when no graft is included Belsey, James Diffo Kaze, Arnaud Jobson, Simon Faulkner, James Maas, Stefan Khakha, Raghbir Wilson, Adrian J. Pape, Dietrich J Exp Orthop Research BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the stability of medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO) with and without different graft materials. Good clinical and radiological outcomes have been demonstrated when either using or not using graft materials during MOWHTO. Variations in the biomechanical properties of different graft types, regarding the stability they provide a MOWHTO, have not been previously investigated. METHODS: A 10 mm biplanar MOWHTO was performed on 15 artificial sawbone tibiae, which were fixed using the Activmotion 2 plate. Five bones had OSferion60 wedges (synthetic group), five had allograft bone wedges (allograft group), and five had no wedges (control group) inserted into the osteotomy gap. Static compression was applied axially to each specimen until failure of the osteotomy. Ultimate load, horizontal and vertical displacements were measured and used to calculate construct stiffness and valgus malrotation of the tibial head. RESULTS: The synthetic group failed at 6.3 kN, followed by the allograft group (6 kN), and the control group (4.5 kN). The most valgus malrotation of the tibial head was observed in the allograft group (2.6°). The synthetic group showed the highest stiffness at the medial side of the tibial head (9.54 kN·mm(− 1)), but the lowest stiffness at the lateral side (1.59 kN·mm(-1)). The allograft group showed high stiffness on the medial side of the tibial head (7.54 kN·mm(− 1)) as well as the highest stiffness on the lateral side (2.18 kN·mm(− 1)). CONCLUSIONS: The use of graft materials in MOWHTO results in superior material properties compared to the use of no graft. The static strength of MOWHTO is highest when synthetic grafts are inserted into the osteotomy gap. Allograft wedges provide higher mechanical strength to a MOWHTO than when no graft used. In comparison to the synthetic grafts, allograft wedges result in the stiffness of the osteotomy being more similar at the medial and lateral cortices. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6439028/ /pubmed/30923931 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-019-0184-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Belsey, James
Diffo Kaze, Arnaud
Jobson, Simon
Faulkner, James
Maas, Stefan
Khakha, Raghbir
Wilson, Adrian J.
Pape, Dietrich
Graft materials provide greater static strength to medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy than when no graft is included
title Graft materials provide greater static strength to medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy than when no graft is included
title_full Graft materials provide greater static strength to medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy than when no graft is included
title_fullStr Graft materials provide greater static strength to medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy than when no graft is included
title_full_unstemmed Graft materials provide greater static strength to medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy than when no graft is included
title_short Graft materials provide greater static strength to medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy than when no graft is included
title_sort graft materials provide greater static strength to medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy than when no graft is included
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6439028/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30923931
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40634-019-0184-6
work_keys_str_mv AT belseyjames graftmaterialsprovidegreaterstaticstrengthtomedialopeningwedgehightibialosteotomythanwhennograftisincluded
AT diffokazearnaud graftmaterialsprovidegreaterstaticstrengthtomedialopeningwedgehightibialosteotomythanwhennograftisincluded
AT jobsonsimon graftmaterialsprovidegreaterstaticstrengthtomedialopeningwedgehightibialosteotomythanwhennograftisincluded
AT faulknerjames graftmaterialsprovidegreaterstaticstrengthtomedialopeningwedgehightibialosteotomythanwhennograftisincluded
AT maasstefan graftmaterialsprovidegreaterstaticstrengthtomedialopeningwedgehightibialosteotomythanwhennograftisincluded
AT khakharaghbir graftmaterialsprovidegreaterstaticstrengthtomedialopeningwedgehightibialosteotomythanwhennograftisincluded
AT wilsonadrianj graftmaterialsprovidegreaterstaticstrengthtomedialopeningwedgehightibialosteotomythanwhennograftisincluded
AT papedietrich graftmaterialsprovidegreaterstaticstrengthtomedialopeningwedgehightibialosteotomythanwhennograftisincluded