Cargando…

Appropriate Surveillance Interval after Colonoscopic Polypectomy in Patients Younger than 50 Years

BACKGROUND: Current postpolypectomy surveillance guidelines are based on studies in patients aged ≥50 years. Equal application of the guidelines in patients aged < 50 years may be unreasonable. We aimed to determine an appropriate surveillance interval after adenoma removal in patients aged <...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jung, Yoon Suk, Kim, Nam Hee, Park, Jung Ho, Park, Dong Il, Sohn, Chong Il
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6439201/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30940997
http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e101
_version_ 1783407214243872768
author Jung, Yoon Suk
Kim, Nam Hee
Park, Jung Ho
Park, Dong Il
Sohn, Chong Il
author_facet Jung, Yoon Suk
Kim, Nam Hee
Park, Jung Ho
Park, Dong Il
Sohn, Chong Il
author_sort Jung, Yoon Suk
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Current postpolypectomy surveillance guidelines are based on studies in patients aged ≥50 years. Equal application of the guidelines in patients aged < 50 years may be unreasonable. We aimed to determine an appropriate surveillance interval after adenoma removal in patients aged < 50 years. METHODS: We studied 10,013 patients who underwent ≥ 1 adenoma removal and follow-up colonoscopy. The cumulative risk of metachronous advanced colorectal neoplasia (ACRN) was compared among the eight groups based on age (30–39, 40–44, 45–49 and ≥ 50 years) and baseline adenoma characteristics (low- [LRA] and high-risk adenoma [HRA]). RESULTS: The risk of metachronous ACRN in patients aged 30–39 and 40–44 years with HRA was comparable to that in those aged ≥ 50 years with LRA (P = 0.839 and P = 0.381, respectively). However, the risk in those aged 45–49 years with HRA was higher than in those aged ≥ 50 years with LRA (P = 0.003), and the risk was not significantly different from that in those aged ≥ 50 years with HRA (P = 0.092). Additionally, the 5-year cumulative risk in those aged 45–49 years with LRA was not significantly different from that in those aged ≥ 50 years with LRA. CONCLUSION: The postpolypectomy surveillance interval can be extended up to 5 years in patients aged 30–44 years with HRA, similar to those aged ≥ 50 years with LRA. However, the interval in patients aged 45–49 years with HRA and LRA should be 3 and 5 years, respectively, similar to those aged ≥ 50 years.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6439201
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64392012019-04-03 Appropriate Surveillance Interval after Colonoscopic Polypectomy in Patients Younger than 50 Years Jung, Yoon Suk Kim, Nam Hee Park, Jung Ho Park, Dong Il Sohn, Chong Il J Korean Med Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: Current postpolypectomy surveillance guidelines are based on studies in patients aged ≥50 years. Equal application of the guidelines in patients aged < 50 years may be unreasonable. We aimed to determine an appropriate surveillance interval after adenoma removal in patients aged < 50 years. METHODS: We studied 10,013 patients who underwent ≥ 1 adenoma removal and follow-up colonoscopy. The cumulative risk of metachronous advanced colorectal neoplasia (ACRN) was compared among the eight groups based on age (30–39, 40–44, 45–49 and ≥ 50 years) and baseline adenoma characteristics (low- [LRA] and high-risk adenoma [HRA]). RESULTS: The risk of metachronous ACRN in patients aged 30–39 and 40–44 years with HRA was comparable to that in those aged ≥ 50 years with LRA (P = 0.839 and P = 0.381, respectively). However, the risk in those aged 45–49 years with HRA was higher than in those aged ≥ 50 years with LRA (P = 0.003), and the risk was not significantly different from that in those aged ≥ 50 years with HRA (P = 0.092). Additionally, the 5-year cumulative risk in those aged 45–49 years with LRA was not significantly different from that in those aged ≥ 50 years with LRA. CONCLUSION: The postpolypectomy surveillance interval can be extended up to 5 years in patients aged 30–44 years with HRA, similar to those aged ≥ 50 years with LRA. However, the interval in patients aged 45–49 years with HRA and LRA should be 3 and 5 years, respectively, similar to those aged ≥ 50 years. The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences 2019-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6439201/ /pubmed/30940997 http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e101 Text en © 2019 The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Jung, Yoon Suk
Kim, Nam Hee
Park, Jung Ho
Park, Dong Il
Sohn, Chong Il
Appropriate Surveillance Interval after Colonoscopic Polypectomy in Patients Younger than 50 Years
title Appropriate Surveillance Interval after Colonoscopic Polypectomy in Patients Younger than 50 Years
title_full Appropriate Surveillance Interval after Colonoscopic Polypectomy in Patients Younger than 50 Years
title_fullStr Appropriate Surveillance Interval after Colonoscopic Polypectomy in Patients Younger than 50 Years
title_full_unstemmed Appropriate Surveillance Interval after Colonoscopic Polypectomy in Patients Younger than 50 Years
title_short Appropriate Surveillance Interval after Colonoscopic Polypectomy in Patients Younger than 50 Years
title_sort appropriate surveillance interval after colonoscopic polypectomy in patients younger than 50 years
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6439201/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30940997
http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e101
work_keys_str_mv AT jungyoonsuk appropriatesurveillanceintervalaftercolonoscopicpolypectomyinpatientsyoungerthan50years
AT kimnamhee appropriatesurveillanceintervalaftercolonoscopicpolypectomyinpatientsyoungerthan50years
AT parkjungho appropriatesurveillanceintervalaftercolonoscopicpolypectomyinpatientsyoungerthan50years
AT parkdongil appropriatesurveillanceintervalaftercolonoscopicpolypectomyinpatientsyoungerthan50years
AT sohnchongil appropriatesurveillanceintervalaftercolonoscopicpolypectomyinpatientsyoungerthan50years