Cargando…

The unstable pacing thresholds of the leadless transcatheter pacemaker affected by body positions in subacute phase after implant

BACKGROUND: If the threshold at implant of leadless transcatheter pacemakers (LTPs) is less than 2.0 V, pacing thresholds reportedly decrease significantly by 1 month and maintain an optimal value of less than 1.0 V by 6 months. CASE SUMMARY: We report a case series of two patients with unstable pac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yoh, Masue, Takagi, Masahiko, Takahashi, Hiroki, Yoshio, Takuro, Shiojima, Ichiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6439362/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31020236
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjcr/yty160
_version_ 1783407247862267904
author Yoh, Masue
Takagi, Masahiko
Takahashi, Hiroki
Yoshio, Takuro
Shiojima, Ichiro
author_facet Yoh, Masue
Takagi, Masahiko
Takahashi, Hiroki
Yoshio, Takuro
Shiojima, Ichiro
author_sort Yoh, Masue
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: If the threshold at implant of leadless transcatheter pacemakers (LTPs) is less than 2.0 V, pacing thresholds reportedly decrease significantly by 1 month and maintain an optimal value of less than 1.0 V by 6 months. CASE SUMMARY: We report a case series of two patients with unstable pacing thresholds of the LTPs in the subacute phase after implant. The first patient (77-year-old man) was implanted an LTP for sick sinus syndrome. At that time of implant, the pacing threshold was 0.9 V at 0.24 ms. At 1 week and 1 month later, the threshold had increased to more than 2.0 V at 0.24 ms. We investigated the trend data for the week and found variations in the threshold. The second patient (81-year-old man) was implanted an LTP for bradycardia and atrial fibrillation. The pacing threshold at implantation was 0.63 V at 0.24 ms. One week later, the threshold had increased in supine position and decreased in sitting position. The trend data for the week were fluctuating greatly. DISCUSSION: The pacing threshold may increase to more than 2.0 V with significant fluctuation on assessment at 1 week and 1 month after implantation in association with changes in body position, even though we confirmed a stable threshold at implant. If an increased threshold is observed, it is necessary to check the trend data and threshold in each body position.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6439362
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64393622019-04-24 The unstable pacing thresholds of the leadless transcatheter pacemaker affected by body positions in subacute phase after implant Yoh, Masue Takagi, Masahiko Takahashi, Hiroki Yoshio, Takuro Shiojima, Ichiro Eur Heart J Case Rep Case Series BACKGROUND: If the threshold at implant of leadless transcatheter pacemakers (LTPs) is less than 2.0 V, pacing thresholds reportedly decrease significantly by 1 month and maintain an optimal value of less than 1.0 V by 6 months. CASE SUMMARY: We report a case series of two patients with unstable pacing thresholds of the LTPs in the subacute phase after implant. The first patient (77-year-old man) was implanted an LTP for sick sinus syndrome. At that time of implant, the pacing threshold was 0.9 V at 0.24 ms. At 1 week and 1 month later, the threshold had increased to more than 2.0 V at 0.24 ms. We investigated the trend data for the week and found variations in the threshold. The second patient (81-year-old man) was implanted an LTP for bradycardia and atrial fibrillation. The pacing threshold at implantation was 0.63 V at 0.24 ms. One week later, the threshold had increased in supine position and decreased in sitting position. The trend data for the week were fluctuating greatly. DISCUSSION: The pacing threshold may increase to more than 2.0 V with significant fluctuation on assessment at 1 week and 1 month after implantation in association with changes in body position, even though we confirmed a stable threshold at implant. If an increased threshold is observed, it is necessary to check the trend data and threshold in each body position. Oxford University Press 2018-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6439362/ /pubmed/31020236 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjcr/yty160 Text en © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Case Series
Yoh, Masue
Takagi, Masahiko
Takahashi, Hiroki
Yoshio, Takuro
Shiojima, Ichiro
The unstable pacing thresholds of the leadless transcatheter pacemaker affected by body positions in subacute phase after implant
title The unstable pacing thresholds of the leadless transcatheter pacemaker affected by body positions in subacute phase after implant
title_full The unstable pacing thresholds of the leadless transcatheter pacemaker affected by body positions in subacute phase after implant
title_fullStr The unstable pacing thresholds of the leadless transcatheter pacemaker affected by body positions in subacute phase after implant
title_full_unstemmed The unstable pacing thresholds of the leadless transcatheter pacemaker affected by body positions in subacute phase after implant
title_short The unstable pacing thresholds of the leadless transcatheter pacemaker affected by body positions in subacute phase after implant
title_sort unstable pacing thresholds of the leadless transcatheter pacemaker affected by body positions in subacute phase after implant
topic Case Series
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6439362/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31020236
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ehjcr/yty160
work_keys_str_mv AT yohmasue theunstablepacingthresholdsoftheleadlesstranscatheterpacemakeraffectedbybodypositionsinsubacutephaseafterimplant
AT takagimasahiko theunstablepacingthresholdsoftheleadlesstranscatheterpacemakeraffectedbybodypositionsinsubacutephaseafterimplant
AT takahashihiroki theunstablepacingthresholdsoftheleadlesstranscatheterpacemakeraffectedbybodypositionsinsubacutephaseafterimplant
AT yoshiotakuro theunstablepacingthresholdsoftheleadlesstranscatheterpacemakeraffectedbybodypositionsinsubacutephaseafterimplant
AT shiojimaichiro theunstablepacingthresholdsoftheleadlesstranscatheterpacemakeraffectedbybodypositionsinsubacutephaseafterimplant
AT yohmasue unstablepacingthresholdsoftheleadlesstranscatheterpacemakeraffectedbybodypositionsinsubacutephaseafterimplant
AT takagimasahiko unstablepacingthresholdsoftheleadlesstranscatheterpacemakeraffectedbybodypositionsinsubacutephaseafterimplant
AT takahashihiroki unstablepacingthresholdsoftheleadlesstranscatheterpacemakeraffectedbybodypositionsinsubacutephaseafterimplant
AT yoshiotakuro unstablepacingthresholdsoftheleadlesstranscatheterpacemakeraffectedbybodypositionsinsubacutephaseafterimplant
AT shiojimaichiro unstablepacingthresholdsoftheleadlesstranscatheterpacemakeraffectedbybodypositionsinsubacutephaseafterimplant