Cargando…

Resistance Toward Chlorhexidine in Oral Bacteria – Is There Cause for Concern?

The threat of antibiotic resistance has attracted strong interest during the last two decades, thus stimulating stewardship programs and research on alternative antimicrobial therapies. Conversely, much less attention has been given to the directly related problem of resistance toward antiseptics an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cieplik, Fabian, Jakubovics, Nicholas S., Buchalla, Wolfgang, Maisch, Tim, Hellwig, Elmar, Al-Ahmad, Ali
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6439480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30967854
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00587
_version_ 1783407271783432192
author Cieplik, Fabian
Jakubovics, Nicholas S.
Buchalla, Wolfgang
Maisch, Tim
Hellwig, Elmar
Al-Ahmad, Ali
author_facet Cieplik, Fabian
Jakubovics, Nicholas S.
Buchalla, Wolfgang
Maisch, Tim
Hellwig, Elmar
Al-Ahmad, Ali
author_sort Cieplik, Fabian
collection PubMed
description The threat of antibiotic resistance has attracted strong interest during the last two decades, thus stimulating stewardship programs and research on alternative antimicrobial therapies. Conversely, much less attention has been given to the directly related problem of resistance toward antiseptics and biocides. While bacterial resistances toward triclosan or quaternary ammonium compounds have been considered in this context, the bis-biguanide chlorhexidine (CHX) has been put into focus only very recently when its use was associated with emergence of stable resistance to the last-resort antibiotic colistin. The antimicrobial effect of CHX is based on damaging the bacterial cytoplasmic membrane and subsequent leakage of cytoplasmic material. Consequently, mechanisms conferring resistance toward CHX include multidrug efflux pumps and cell membrane changes. For instance, in staphylococci it has been shown that plasmid-borne qac (“quaternary ammonium compound”) genes encode Qac efflux proteins that recognize cationic antiseptics as substrates. In Pseudomonas stutzeri, changes in the outer membrane protein and lipopolysaccharide profiles have been implicated in CHX resistance. However, little is known about the risk of resistance toward CHX in oral bacteria and potential mechanisms conferring this resistance or even cross-resistances toward antibiotics. Interestingly, there is also little awareness about the risk of CHX resistance in the dental community even though CHX has been widely used in dental practice as the gold-standard antiseptic for more than 40 years and is also included in a wide range of oral care consumer products. This review provides an overview of general resistance mechanisms toward CHX and the evidence for CHX resistance in oral bacteria. Furthermore, this work aims to raise awareness among the dental community about the risk of resistance toward CHX and accompanying cross-resistance to antibiotics. We propose new research directions related to the effects of CHX on bacteria in oral biofilms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6439480
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64394802019-04-09 Resistance Toward Chlorhexidine in Oral Bacteria – Is There Cause for Concern? Cieplik, Fabian Jakubovics, Nicholas S. Buchalla, Wolfgang Maisch, Tim Hellwig, Elmar Al-Ahmad, Ali Front Microbiol Microbiology The threat of antibiotic resistance has attracted strong interest during the last two decades, thus stimulating stewardship programs and research on alternative antimicrobial therapies. Conversely, much less attention has been given to the directly related problem of resistance toward antiseptics and biocides. While bacterial resistances toward triclosan or quaternary ammonium compounds have been considered in this context, the bis-biguanide chlorhexidine (CHX) has been put into focus only very recently when its use was associated with emergence of stable resistance to the last-resort antibiotic colistin. The antimicrobial effect of CHX is based on damaging the bacterial cytoplasmic membrane and subsequent leakage of cytoplasmic material. Consequently, mechanisms conferring resistance toward CHX include multidrug efflux pumps and cell membrane changes. For instance, in staphylococci it has been shown that plasmid-borne qac (“quaternary ammonium compound”) genes encode Qac efflux proteins that recognize cationic antiseptics as substrates. In Pseudomonas stutzeri, changes in the outer membrane protein and lipopolysaccharide profiles have been implicated in CHX resistance. However, little is known about the risk of resistance toward CHX in oral bacteria and potential mechanisms conferring this resistance or even cross-resistances toward antibiotics. Interestingly, there is also little awareness about the risk of CHX resistance in the dental community even though CHX has been widely used in dental practice as the gold-standard antiseptic for more than 40 years and is also included in a wide range of oral care consumer products. This review provides an overview of general resistance mechanisms toward CHX and the evidence for CHX resistance in oral bacteria. Furthermore, this work aims to raise awareness among the dental community about the risk of resistance toward CHX and accompanying cross-resistance to antibiotics. We propose new research directions related to the effects of CHX on bacteria in oral biofilms. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6439480/ /pubmed/30967854 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00587 Text en Copyright © 2019 Cieplik, Jakubovics, Buchalla, Maisch, Hellwig and Al-Ahmad. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Cieplik, Fabian
Jakubovics, Nicholas S.
Buchalla, Wolfgang
Maisch, Tim
Hellwig, Elmar
Al-Ahmad, Ali
Resistance Toward Chlorhexidine in Oral Bacteria – Is There Cause for Concern?
title Resistance Toward Chlorhexidine in Oral Bacteria – Is There Cause for Concern?
title_full Resistance Toward Chlorhexidine in Oral Bacteria – Is There Cause for Concern?
title_fullStr Resistance Toward Chlorhexidine in Oral Bacteria – Is There Cause for Concern?
title_full_unstemmed Resistance Toward Chlorhexidine in Oral Bacteria – Is There Cause for Concern?
title_short Resistance Toward Chlorhexidine in Oral Bacteria – Is There Cause for Concern?
title_sort resistance toward chlorhexidine in oral bacteria – is there cause for concern?
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6439480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30967854
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00587
work_keys_str_mv AT cieplikfabian resistancetowardchlorhexidineinoralbacteriaistherecauseforconcern
AT jakubovicsnicholass resistancetowardchlorhexidineinoralbacteriaistherecauseforconcern
AT buchallawolfgang resistancetowardchlorhexidineinoralbacteriaistherecauseforconcern
AT maischtim resistancetowardchlorhexidineinoralbacteriaistherecauseforconcern
AT hellwigelmar resistancetowardchlorhexidineinoralbacteriaistherecauseforconcern
AT alahmadali resistancetowardchlorhexidineinoralbacteriaistherecauseforconcern