Cargando…
Resistance Toward Chlorhexidine in Oral Bacteria – Is There Cause for Concern?
The threat of antibiotic resistance has attracted strong interest during the last two decades, thus stimulating stewardship programs and research on alternative antimicrobial therapies. Conversely, much less attention has been given to the directly related problem of resistance toward antiseptics an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6439480/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30967854 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00587 |
_version_ | 1783407271783432192 |
---|---|
author | Cieplik, Fabian Jakubovics, Nicholas S. Buchalla, Wolfgang Maisch, Tim Hellwig, Elmar Al-Ahmad, Ali |
author_facet | Cieplik, Fabian Jakubovics, Nicholas S. Buchalla, Wolfgang Maisch, Tim Hellwig, Elmar Al-Ahmad, Ali |
author_sort | Cieplik, Fabian |
collection | PubMed |
description | The threat of antibiotic resistance has attracted strong interest during the last two decades, thus stimulating stewardship programs and research on alternative antimicrobial therapies. Conversely, much less attention has been given to the directly related problem of resistance toward antiseptics and biocides. While bacterial resistances toward triclosan or quaternary ammonium compounds have been considered in this context, the bis-biguanide chlorhexidine (CHX) has been put into focus only very recently when its use was associated with emergence of stable resistance to the last-resort antibiotic colistin. The antimicrobial effect of CHX is based on damaging the bacterial cytoplasmic membrane and subsequent leakage of cytoplasmic material. Consequently, mechanisms conferring resistance toward CHX include multidrug efflux pumps and cell membrane changes. For instance, in staphylococci it has been shown that plasmid-borne qac (“quaternary ammonium compound”) genes encode Qac efflux proteins that recognize cationic antiseptics as substrates. In Pseudomonas stutzeri, changes in the outer membrane protein and lipopolysaccharide profiles have been implicated in CHX resistance. However, little is known about the risk of resistance toward CHX in oral bacteria and potential mechanisms conferring this resistance or even cross-resistances toward antibiotics. Interestingly, there is also little awareness about the risk of CHX resistance in the dental community even though CHX has been widely used in dental practice as the gold-standard antiseptic for more than 40 years and is also included in a wide range of oral care consumer products. This review provides an overview of general resistance mechanisms toward CHX and the evidence for CHX resistance in oral bacteria. Furthermore, this work aims to raise awareness among the dental community about the risk of resistance toward CHX and accompanying cross-resistance to antibiotics. We propose new research directions related to the effects of CHX on bacteria in oral biofilms. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6439480 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64394802019-04-09 Resistance Toward Chlorhexidine in Oral Bacteria – Is There Cause for Concern? Cieplik, Fabian Jakubovics, Nicholas S. Buchalla, Wolfgang Maisch, Tim Hellwig, Elmar Al-Ahmad, Ali Front Microbiol Microbiology The threat of antibiotic resistance has attracted strong interest during the last two decades, thus stimulating stewardship programs and research on alternative antimicrobial therapies. Conversely, much less attention has been given to the directly related problem of resistance toward antiseptics and biocides. While bacterial resistances toward triclosan or quaternary ammonium compounds have been considered in this context, the bis-biguanide chlorhexidine (CHX) has been put into focus only very recently when its use was associated with emergence of stable resistance to the last-resort antibiotic colistin. The antimicrobial effect of CHX is based on damaging the bacterial cytoplasmic membrane and subsequent leakage of cytoplasmic material. Consequently, mechanisms conferring resistance toward CHX include multidrug efflux pumps and cell membrane changes. For instance, in staphylococci it has been shown that plasmid-borne qac (“quaternary ammonium compound”) genes encode Qac efflux proteins that recognize cationic antiseptics as substrates. In Pseudomonas stutzeri, changes in the outer membrane protein and lipopolysaccharide profiles have been implicated in CHX resistance. However, little is known about the risk of resistance toward CHX in oral bacteria and potential mechanisms conferring this resistance or even cross-resistances toward antibiotics. Interestingly, there is also little awareness about the risk of CHX resistance in the dental community even though CHX has been widely used in dental practice as the gold-standard antiseptic for more than 40 years and is also included in a wide range of oral care consumer products. This review provides an overview of general resistance mechanisms toward CHX and the evidence for CHX resistance in oral bacteria. Furthermore, this work aims to raise awareness among the dental community about the risk of resistance toward CHX and accompanying cross-resistance to antibiotics. We propose new research directions related to the effects of CHX on bacteria in oral biofilms. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6439480/ /pubmed/30967854 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00587 Text en Copyright © 2019 Cieplik, Jakubovics, Buchalla, Maisch, Hellwig and Al-Ahmad. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Microbiology Cieplik, Fabian Jakubovics, Nicholas S. Buchalla, Wolfgang Maisch, Tim Hellwig, Elmar Al-Ahmad, Ali Resistance Toward Chlorhexidine in Oral Bacteria – Is There Cause for Concern? |
title | Resistance Toward Chlorhexidine in Oral Bacteria – Is There Cause for Concern? |
title_full | Resistance Toward Chlorhexidine in Oral Bacteria – Is There Cause for Concern? |
title_fullStr | Resistance Toward Chlorhexidine in Oral Bacteria – Is There Cause for Concern? |
title_full_unstemmed | Resistance Toward Chlorhexidine in Oral Bacteria – Is There Cause for Concern? |
title_short | Resistance Toward Chlorhexidine in Oral Bacteria – Is There Cause for Concern? |
title_sort | resistance toward chlorhexidine in oral bacteria – is there cause for concern? |
topic | Microbiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6439480/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30967854 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00587 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cieplikfabian resistancetowardchlorhexidineinoralbacteriaistherecauseforconcern AT jakubovicsnicholass resistancetowardchlorhexidineinoralbacteriaistherecauseforconcern AT buchallawolfgang resistancetowardchlorhexidineinoralbacteriaistherecauseforconcern AT maischtim resistancetowardchlorhexidineinoralbacteriaistherecauseforconcern AT hellwigelmar resistancetowardchlorhexidineinoralbacteriaistherecauseforconcern AT alahmadali resistancetowardchlorhexidineinoralbacteriaistherecauseforconcern |