Cargando…

Community pharmacy staff’s response to symptoms of common infections: a pseudo-patient study

BACKGROUND: Inappropriate over-the-counter supply of antibiotics in pharmacies for common infections is recognised as a source of antibiotic misuse that can worsen the global burden of antibiotic resistance. OBJECTIVES: To assess responses of community pharmacy staff to pseudo-patients presenting wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zawahir, Shukry, Lekamwasam, Sarath, Aslani, Parisa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6439995/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30976387
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-019-0510-x
_version_ 1783407307090034688
author Zawahir, Shukry
Lekamwasam, Sarath
Aslani, Parisa
author_facet Zawahir, Shukry
Lekamwasam, Sarath
Aslani, Parisa
author_sort Zawahir, Shukry
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Inappropriate over-the-counter supply of antibiotics in pharmacies for common infections is recognised as a source of antibiotic misuse that can worsen the global burden of antibiotic resistance. OBJECTIVES: To assess responses of community pharmacy staff to pseudo-patients presenting with symptoms of common infections and factors associated with such behaviour. METHODS: A cross-sectional pseudo-patient study was conducted from Jan-Sept 2017 among 242 community pharmacies in Sri Lanka. Each pharmacy was visited by one trained pseudo-patient who pretended to have a relative with clinical symptoms of one of four randomly selected clinical scenarios of common infections (three viral infections: acute sore throat, common cold, acute diarrhoea) and a bacterial uncomplicated urinary tract infection. Pseudo-patients requested an unspecified medicine for their condition. Interactions between the attending pharmacy staff and the pseudo-patients were audio recorded (with prior permission). Interaction data were also entered into a data collection form immediately after each visit. RESULTS: In 41% (99/242) of the interactions, an antibiotic was supplied illegally without a prescription. Of these, 66% (n = 65) were inappropriately given for the viral infections. Antibiotics were provided for 55% of the urinary tract infections, 50% of the acute diarrhoea, 42% of the sore throat and 15% of the common cold cases. Patient history was obtained in less than a quarter of the interactions. In 18% (44/242) of the interactions staff recommended the pseudo-patient to visit a physician, however, in 25% (11/44) of these interactions an antibiotic was still dispensed. Pharmacy staff advised the pseudo-patient on how to take (in 60% of the interactions where an antibiotic was supplied), when to take (47%) and when to stop (22%) the antibiotics supplied. Availability of a pharmacist reduced the likelihood of unlawful antibiotic supply (OR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.31–0.89; P = 0.016) but not appropriate practice. CONCLUSIONS: Illegal and inappropriate dispensing of antibiotics was evident in the participating community pharmacies. This may be a public health threat to Sri Lanka and beyond. Strategies to improve the appropriate dispensing practice of antibiotics among community pharmacies should be considered seriously.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6439995
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64399952019-04-11 Community pharmacy staff’s response to symptoms of common infections: a pseudo-patient study Zawahir, Shukry Lekamwasam, Sarath Aslani, Parisa Antimicrob Resist Infect Control Research BACKGROUND: Inappropriate over-the-counter supply of antibiotics in pharmacies for common infections is recognised as a source of antibiotic misuse that can worsen the global burden of antibiotic resistance. OBJECTIVES: To assess responses of community pharmacy staff to pseudo-patients presenting with symptoms of common infections and factors associated with such behaviour. METHODS: A cross-sectional pseudo-patient study was conducted from Jan-Sept 2017 among 242 community pharmacies in Sri Lanka. Each pharmacy was visited by one trained pseudo-patient who pretended to have a relative with clinical symptoms of one of four randomly selected clinical scenarios of common infections (three viral infections: acute sore throat, common cold, acute diarrhoea) and a bacterial uncomplicated urinary tract infection. Pseudo-patients requested an unspecified medicine for their condition. Interactions between the attending pharmacy staff and the pseudo-patients were audio recorded (with prior permission). Interaction data were also entered into a data collection form immediately after each visit. RESULTS: In 41% (99/242) of the interactions, an antibiotic was supplied illegally without a prescription. Of these, 66% (n = 65) were inappropriately given for the viral infections. Antibiotics were provided for 55% of the urinary tract infections, 50% of the acute diarrhoea, 42% of the sore throat and 15% of the common cold cases. Patient history was obtained in less than a quarter of the interactions. In 18% (44/242) of the interactions staff recommended the pseudo-patient to visit a physician, however, in 25% (11/44) of these interactions an antibiotic was still dispensed. Pharmacy staff advised the pseudo-patient on how to take (in 60% of the interactions where an antibiotic was supplied), when to take (47%) and when to stop (22%) the antibiotics supplied. Availability of a pharmacist reduced the likelihood of unlawful antibiotic supply (OR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.31–0.89; P = 0.016) but not appropriate practice. CONCLUSIONS: Illegal and inappropriate dispensing of antibiotics was evident in the participating community pharmacies. This may be a public health threat to Sri Lanka and beyond. Strategies to improve the appropriate dispensing practice of antibiotics among community pharmacies should be considered seriously. BioMed Central 2019-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6439995/ /pubmed/30976387 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-019-0510-x Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Zawahir, Shukry
Lekamwasam, Sarath
Aslani, Parisa
Community pharmacy staff’s response to symptoms of common infections: a pseudo-patient study
title Community pharmacy staff’s response to symptoms of common infections: a pseudo-patient study
title_full Community pharmacy staff’s response to symptoms of common infections: a pseudo-patient study
title_fullStr Community pharmacy staff’s response to symptoms of common infections: a pseudo-patient study
title_full_unstemmed Community pharmacy staff’s response to symptoms of common infections: a pseudo-patient study
title_short Community pharmacy staff’s response to symptoms of common infections: a pseudo-patient study
title_sort community pharmacy staff’s response to symptoms of common infections: a pseudo-patient study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6439995/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30976387
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-019-0510-x
work_keys_str_mv AT zawahirshukry communitypharmacystaffsresponsetosymptomsofcommoninfectionsapseudopatientstudy
AT lekamwasamsarath communitypharmacystaffsresponsetosymptomsofcommoninfectionsapseudopatientstudy
AT aslaniparisa communitypharmacystaffsresponsetosymptomsofcommoninfectionsapseudopatientstudy