Cargando…

Pulsed immune reconstitution therapy in multiple sclerosis

Whereas drugs used for maintenance/escalation therapy do not maintain their beneficial effect after cessation of therapy, some new highly effective therapies can show prolonged treatment effects after a short treatment course. Such therapies have been named pulsed immune reconstitution therapies or...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sorensen, Per Soelberg, Sellebjerg, Finn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6440030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30944586
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756286419836913
_version_ 1783407315867664384
author Sorensen, Per Soelberg
Sellebjerg, Finn
author_facet Sorensen, Per Soelberg
Sellebjerg, Finn
author_sort Sorensen, Per Soelberg
collection PubMed
description Whereas drugs used for maintenance/escalation therapy do not maintain their beneficial effect after cessation of therapy, some new highly effective therapies can show prolonged treatment effects after a short treatment course. Such therapies have been named pulsed immune reconstitution therapies or pulsed immunosuppressive therapies, and typical representatives are alemtuzumab and cladribine. Autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation could be considered as the strongest immune reconstitution therapy. Both alemtuzumab and cladribine induce depletion of lymphocytes, and a common mechanism of action is preferential depletion of class-switched and unswitched memory B-cells. Whereas CD-19+ B-lymphocytes repopulate within 6 months, CD4+ T-cells repopulate at a slower rate, taking 1–2 years to reach the lower level of normal. In general, the depletion of lymphocytes is more profound and the repletion of T-cells is slower after alemtuzumab than after cladribine treatment. Both drugs have a strong effect on relapses and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) activity, and reduce disability worsening. The therapeutic effect is maintained beyond the period of active treatment in a large proportion of patients, which is best documented for alemtuzumab. Adverse effects include reactivation of latent infections such as tuberculosis and risk of herpes zoster. The main disadvantage in alemtuzumab-treated patients is the risk of secondary immune-mediated disorders. Pulsed immune reconstitution therapy is an option as initial therapy in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients with high disease activity and in patients on treatment with another disease-modifying therapy with significant relapse and/or MRI activity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6440030
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64400302019-04-03 Pulsed immune reconstitution therapy in multiple sclerosis Sorensen, Per Soelberg Sellebjerg, Finn Ther Adv Neurol Disord Review Whereas drugs used for maintenance/escalation therapy do not maintain their beneficial effect after cessation of therapy, some new highly effective therapies can show prolonged treatment effects after a short treatment course. Such therapies have been named pulsed immune reconstitution therapies or pulsed immunosuppressive therapies, and typical representatives are alemtuzumab and cladribine. Autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation could be considered as the strongest immune reconstitution therapy. Both alemtuzumab and cladribine induce depletion of lymphocytes, and a common mechanism of action is preferential depletion of class-switched and unswitched memory B-cells. Whereas CD-19+ B-lymphocytes repopulate within 6 months, CD4+ T-cells repopulate at a slower rate, taking 1–2 years to reach the lower level of normal. In general, the depletion of lymphocytes is more profound and the repletion of T-cells is slower after alemtuzumab than after cladribine treatment. Both drugs have a strong effect on relapses and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) activity, and reduce disability worsening. The therapeutic effect is maintained beyond the period of active treatment in a large proportion of patients, which is best documented for alemtuzumab. Adverse effects include reactivation of latent infections such as tuberculosis and risk of herpes zoster. The main disadvantage in alemtuzumab-treated patients is the risk of secondary immune-mediated disorders. Pulsed immune reconstitution therapy is an option as initial therapy in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients with high disease activity and in patients on treatment with another disease-modifying therapy with significant relapse and/or MRI activity. SAGE Publications 2019-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC6440030/ /pubmed/30944586 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756286419836913 Text en © The Author(s), 2019 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Review
Sorensen, Per Soelberg
Sellebjerg, Finn
Pulsed immune reconstitution therapy in multiple sclerosis
title Pulsed immune reconstitution therapy in multiple sclerosis
title_full Pulsed immune reconstitution therapy in multiple sclerosis
title_fullStr Pulsed immune reconstitution therapy in multiple sclerosis
title_full_unstemmed Pulsed immune reconstitution therapy in multiple sclerosis
title_short Pulsed immune reconstitution therapy in multiple sclerosis
title_sort pulsed immune reconstitution therapy in multiple sclerosis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6440030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30944586
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1756286419836913
work_keys_str_mv AT sorensenpersoelberg pulsedimmunereconstitutiontherapyinmultiplesclerosis
AT sellebjergfinn pulsedimmunereconstitutiontherapyinmultiplesclerosis