Cargando…
Combination of Hydroquinone and Fractional CO(2) Laser versus Hydroquinone Monotherapy in Melasma Treatment: A Randomized, Single-blinded, Split-face Clinical Trial
BACKGROUND: Melasma is a chronic hyperpigmentation skin disorder mainly affecting women in the reproductive age. Available treatments for melasma do not lead to long-term satisfactory results. AIMS: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of fractional CO(2) laser in combination with topical therap...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6440181/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30983609 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijd.IJD_240_17 |
_version_ | 1783407351387127808 |
---|---|
author | Nourmohammadi Abadchi, Sanaz Fatemi Naeini, Farahnaz Beheshtian, Elham |
author_facet | Nourmohammadi Abadchi, Sanaz Fatemi Naeini, Farahnaz Beheshtian, Elham |
author_sort | Nourmohammadi Abadchi, Sanaz |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Melasma is a chronic hyperpigmentation skin disorder mainly affecting women in the reproductive age. Available treatments for melasma do not lead to long-term satisfactory results. AIMS: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of fractional CO(2) laser in combination with topical therapy to topical therapy alone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty women with bilateral melasma were studied in this randomized single-blinded clinical trial. Each side of the face was randomly allotted to either topical hydroquinone 4% or combination of topical hydroquinone 4% and fractional CO(2) laser. Patients received three sessions of laser therapy at 3-week intervals. Hydroquinone 4% application on both sides maintained for 3 months after the last laser session. The clinical improvement (darkness [D] and homogeneity [H] of hyperpigmentation) was measured by a blinded main investigator and an outcome assessor. Furthermore, improvement was assessed by physician's global assessment (PGA) and patient satisfaction (visual analog scale [VAS] score). RESULTS: Significant reduction in D observed 3 weeks after combination therapy (P<0.001) and 6 weeks after monotherapy (P<0.001). Reduction in H became significant after 6 weeks in both groups (P<0.001). However, the two methods were not considerably different in any session (P>0.05). Furthermore, control and experiment sides were not significantly different considering VAS score and PGA (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Considering the short-term outcome of laser and hydroquinone therapy, we can apply it to obtain earlier positive results. However, because of the lack of significant difference between the two methods and also the high cost of laser therapy, it seems better not to recommend fractional CO(2) laser to patients as adjunctive therapy for long-term treatment of melasma. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6440181 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64401812019-04-12 Combination of Hydroquinone and Fractional CO(2) Laser versus Hydroquinone Monotherapy in Melasma Treatment: A Randomized, Single-blinded, Split-face Clinical Trial Nourmohammadi Abadchi, Sanaz Fatemi Naeini, Farahnaz Beheshtian, Elham Indian J Dermatol Original Article BACKGROUND: Melasma is a chronic hyperpigmentation skin disorder mainly affecting women in the reproductive age. Available treatments for melasma do not lead to long-term satisfactory results. AIMS: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of fractional CO(2) laser in combination with topical therapy to topical therapy alone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty women with bilateral melasma were studied in this randomized single-blinded clinical trial. Each side of the face was randomly allotted to either topical hydroquinone 4% or combination of topical hydroquinone 4% and fractional CO(2) laser. Patients received three sessions of laser therapy at 3-week intervals. Hydroquinone 4% application on both sides maintained for 3 months after the last laser session. The clinical improvement (darkness [D] and homogeneity [H] of hyperpigmentation) was measured by a blinded main investigator and an outcome assessor. Furthermore, improvement was assessed by physician's global assessment (PGA) and patient satisfaction (visual analog scale [VAS] score). RESULTS: Significant reduction in D observed 3 weeks after combination therapy (P<0.001) and 6 weeks after monotherapy (P<0.001). Reduction in H became significant after 6 weeks in both groups (P<0.001). However, the two methods were not considerably different in any session (P>0.05). Furthermore, control and experiment sides were not significantly different considering VAS score and PGA (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Considering the short-term outcome of laser and hydroquinone therapy, we can apply it to obtain earlier positive results. However, because of the lack of significant difference between the two methods and also the high cost of laser therapy, it seems better not to recommend fractional CO(2) laser to patients as adjunctive therapy for long-term treatment of melasma. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6440181/ /pubmed/30983609 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijd.IJD_240_17 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Indian Journal of Dermatology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Nourmohammadi Abadchi, Sanaz Fatemi Naeini, Farahnaz Beheshtian, Elham Combination of Hydroquinone and Fractional CO(2) Laser versus Hydroquinone Monotherapy in Melasma Treatment: A Randomized, Single-blinded, Split-face Clinical Trial |
title | Combination of Hydroquinone and Fractional CO(2) Laser versus Hydroquinone Monotherapy in Melasma Treatment: A Randomized, Single-blinded, Split-face Clinical Trial |
title_full | Combination of Hydroquinone and Fractional CO(2) Laser versus Hydroquinone Monotherapy in Melasma Treatment: A Randomized, Single-blinded, Split-face Clinical Trial |
title_fullStr | Combination of Hydroquinone and Fractional CO(2) Laser versus Hydroquinone Monotherapy in Melasma Treatment: A Randomized, Single-blinded, Split-face Clinical Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Combination of Hydroquinone and Fractional CO(2) Laser versus Hydroquinone Monotherapy in Melasma Treatment: A Randomized, Single-blinded, Split-face Clinical Trial |
title_short | Combination of Hydroquinone and Fractional CO(2) Laser versus Hydroquinone Monotherapy in Melasma Treatment: A Randomized, Single-blinded, Split-face Clinical Trial |
title_sort | combination of hydroquinone and fractional co(2) laser versus hydroquinone monotherapy in melasma treatment: a randomized, single-blinded, split-face clinical trial |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6440181/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30983609 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijd.IJD_240_17 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nourmohammadiabadchisanaz combinationofhydroquinoneandfractionalco2laserversushydroquinonemonotherapyinmelasmatreatmentarandomizedsingleblindedsplitfaceclinicaltrial AT fateminaeinifarahnaz combinationofhydroquinoneandfractionalco2laserversushydroquinonemonotherapyinmelasmatreatmentarandomizedsingleblindedsplitfaceclinicaltrial AT beheshtianelham combinationofhydroquinoneandfractionalco2laserversushydroquinonemonotherapyinmelasmatreatmentarandomizedsingleblindedsplitfaceclinicaltrial |