Cargando…

Combination of Hydroquinone and Fractional CO(2) Laser versus Hydroquinone Monotherapy in Melasma Treatment: A Randomized, Single-blinded, Split-face Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND: Melasma is a chronic hyperpigmentation skin disorder mainly affecting women in the reproductive age. Available treatments for melasma do not lead to long-term satisfactory results. AIMS: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of fractional CO(2) laser in combination with topical therap...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nourmohammadi Abadchi, Sanaz, Fatemi Naeini, Farahnaz, Beheshtian, Elham
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6440181/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30983609
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijd.IJD_240_17
_version_ 1783407351387127808
author Nourmohammadi Abadchi, Sanaz
Fatemi Naeini, Farahnaz
Beheshtian, Elham
author_facet Nourmohammadi Abadchi, Sanaz
Fatemi Naeini, Farahnaz
Beheshtian, Elham
author_sort Nourmohammadi Abadchi, Sanaz
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Melasma is a chronic hyperpigmentation skin disorder mainly affecting women in the reproductive age. Available treatments for melasma do not lead to long-term satisfactory results. AIMS: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of fractional CO(2) laser in combination with topical therapy to topical therapy alone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty women with bilateral melasma were studied in this randomized single-blinded clinical trial. Each side of the face was randomly allotted to either topical hydroquinone 4% or combination of topical hydroquinone 4% and fractional CO(2) laser. Patients received three sessions of laser therapy at 3-week intervals. Hydroquinone 4% application on both sides maintained for 3 months after the last laser session. The clinical improvement (darkness [D] and homogeneity [H] of hyperpigmentation) was measured by a blinded main investigator and an outcome assessor. Furthermore, improvement was assessed by physician's global assessment (PGA) and patient satisfaction (visual analog scale [VAS] score). RESULTS: Significant reduction in D observed 3 weeks after combination therapy (P<0.001) and 6 weeks after monotherapy (P<0.001). Reduction in H became significant after 6 weeks in both groups (P<0.001). However, the two methods were not considerably different in any session (P>0.05). Furthermore, control and experiment sides were not significantly different considering VAS score and PGA (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Considering the short-term outcome of laser and hydroquinone therapy, we can apply it to obtain earlier positive results. However, because of the lack of significant difference between the two methods and also the high cost of laser therapy, it seems better not to recommend fractional CO(2) laser to patients as adjunctive therapy for long-term treatment of melasma.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6440181
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64401812019-04-12 Combination of Hydroquinone and Fractional CO(2) Laser versus Hydroquinone Monotherapy in Melasma Treatment: A Randomized, Single-blinded, Split-face Clinical Trial Nourmohammadi Abadchi, Sanaz Fatemi Naeini, Farahnaz Beheshtian, Elham Indian J Dermatol Original Article BACKGROUND: Melasma is a chronic hyperpigmentation skin disorder mainly affecting women in the reproductive age. Available treatments for melasma do not lead to long-term satisfactory results. AIMS: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of fractional CO(2) laser in combination with topical therapy to topical therapy alone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty women with bilateral melasma were studied in this randomized single-blinded clinical trial. Each side of the face was randomly allotted to either topical hydroquinone 4% or combination of topical hydroquinone 4% and fractional CO(2) laser. Patients received three sessions of laser therapy at 3-week intervals. Hydroquinone 4% application on both sides maintained for 3 months after the last laser session. The clinical improvement (darkness [D] and homogeneity [H] of hyperpigmentation) was measured by a blinded main investigator and an outcome assessor. Furthermore, improvement was assessed by physician's global assessment (PGA) and patient satisfaction (visual analog scale [VAS] score). RESULTS: Significant reduction in D observed 3 weeks after combination therapy (P<0.001) and 6 weeks after monotherapy (P<0.001). Reduction in H became significant after 6 weeks in both groups (P<0.001). However, the two methods were not considerably different in any session (P>0.05). Furthermore, control and experiment sides were not significantly different considering VAS score and PGA (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Considering the short-term outcome of laser and hydroquinone therapy, we can apply it to obtain earlier positive results. However, because of the lack of significant difference between the two methods and also the high cost of laser therapy, it seems better not to recommend fractional CO(2) laser to patients as adjunctive therapy for long-term treatment of melasma. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6440181/ /pubmed/30983609 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijd.IJD_240_17 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Indian Journal of Dermatology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Nourmohammadi Abadchi, Sanaz
Fatemi Naeini, Farahnaz
Beheshtian, Elham
Combination of Hydroquinone and Fractional CO(2) Laser versus Hydroquinone Monotherapy in Melasma Treatment: A Randomized, Single-blinded, Split-face Clinical Trial
title Combination of Hydroquinone and Fractional CO(2) Laser versus Hydroquinone Monotherapy in Melasma Treatment: A Randomized, Single-blinded, Split-face Clinical Trial
title_full Combination of Hydroquinone and Fractional CO(2) Laser versus Hydroquinone Monotherapy in Melasma Treatment: A Randomized, Single-blinded, Split-face Clinical Trial
title_fullStr Combination of Hydroquinone and Fractional CO(2) Laser versus Hydroquinone Monotherapy in Melasma Treatment: A Randomized, Single-blinded, Split-face Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed Combination of Hydroquinone and Fractional CO(2) Laser versus Hydroquinone Monotherapy in Melasma Treatment: A Randomized, Single-blinded, Split-face Clinical Trial
title_short Combination of Hydroquinone and Fractional CO(2) Laser versus Hydroquinone Monotherapy in Melasma Treatment: A Randomized, Single-blinded, Split-face Clinical Trial
title_sort combination of hydroquinone and fractional co(2) laser versus hydroquinone monotherapy in melasma treatment: a randomized, single-blinded, split-face clinical trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6440181/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30983609
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijd.IJD_240_17
work_keys_str_mv AT nourmohammadiabadchisanaz combinationofhydroquinoneandfractionalco2laserversushydroquinonemonotherapyinmelasmatreatmentarandomizedsingleblindedsplitfaceclinicaltrial
AT fateminaeinifarahnaz combinationofhydroquinoneandfractionalco2laserversushydroquinonemonotherapyinmelasmatreatmentarandomizedsingleblindedsplitfaceclinicaltrial
AT beheshtianelham combinationofhydroquinoneandfractionalco2laserversushydroquinonemonotherapyinmelasmatreatmentarandomizedsingleblindedsplitfaceclinicaltrial