Cargando…

Intraoperative partial pressure of oxygen measurement to predict flap survival

INTRODUCTION: Flap monitoring using partial pressure of oxygen (pO(2)) is a proven modality. Instruments needed are expensive and are not readily available to a clinician. Here, pO(2) of flap has been determined using readily available and cheap methods, and a cut-off value is calculated which helps...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gupta, Ankit, Kumar, Akhil, Gupta, Shyam, Bhattacharaya, Sameek, Jha, Manoj Kumar, Tiwari, Vinay Kumar, Kulal, R. Pradeep, Gupta, Shobhit, Niyazi, Sahil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6440342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30983725
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijps.IJPS_35_17
_version_ 1783407369146859520
author Gupta, Ankit
Kumar, Akhil
Gupta, Shyam
Bhattacharaya, Sameek
Jha, Manoj Kumar
Tiwari, Vinay Kumar
Kulal, R. Pradeep
Gupta, Shobhit
Niyazi, Sahil
author_facet Gupta, Ankit
Kumar, Akhil
Gupta, Shyam
Bhattacharaya, Sameek
Jha, Manoj Kumar
Tiwari, Vinay Kumar
Kulal, R. Pradeep
Gupta, Shobhit
Niyazi, Sahil
author_sort Gupta, Ankit
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Flap monitoring using partial pressure of oxygen (pO(2)) is a proven modality. Instruments needed are expensive and are not readily available to a clinician. Here, pO(2) of flap has been determined using readily available and cheap methods, and a cut-off value is calculated which helps in predicting flap outcome. METHODS AND RESULTS: Total 235 points on 84 skin flaps were studied. Capillary blood was collected from flap and fingertip using 1-ml syringes after at least 30 min of flap inset, and pO(2) analysed using blood gas analyser. Fall/change of pO(2) (difference of mean of pO(2) [diff-pO(2)]) was also calculated by subtracting the flap pO(2) from the finger pO(2). Flap was monitored clinically in post-operative period and divided into two groups depending on its survival with Group 1 – dead points and Group 2 – alive points. pO(2) and diff-pO(2) amongst both the groups were compared and found to be statistically different (P = 0.0001). Cut-off value calculated for pO(2) was found to be <86.3 mmHg with a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 89.05%. The difference of >68.503 mmHg of flap pO(2) compared from finger pO(2) was calculated as a cut-off with sensitivity of 94.12 and specificity of 79.60%. CONCLUSIONS: Flap areas having intra-operative pO(2) value <86.3 mmHG have higher chances (60.71%) of getting necrosis later. Similarly, if diff-pO(2) compared to fingertip is >68.5 mmHg, chances of those points getting necrosed in post-operative period are high.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6440342
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64403422019-04-12 Intraoperative partial pressure of oxygen measurement to predict flap survival Gupta, Ankit Kumar, Akhil Gupta, Shyam Bhattacharaya, Sameek Jha, Manoj Kumar Tiwari, Vinay Kumar Kulal, R. Pradeep Gupta, Shobhit Niyazi, Sahil Indian J Plast Surg Original Article INTRODUCTION: Flap monitoring using partial pressure of oxygen (pO(2)) is a proven modality. Instruments needed are expensive and are not readily available to a clinician. Here, pO(2) of flap has been determined using readily available and cheap methods, and a cut-off value is calculated which helps in predicting flap outcome. METHODS AND RESULTS: Total 235 points on 84 skin flaps were studied. Capillary blood was collected from flap and fingertip using 1-ml syringes after at least 30 min of flap inset, and pO(2) analysed using blood gas analyser. Fall/change of pO(2) (difference of mean of pO(2) [diff-pO(2)]) was also calculated by subtracting the flap pO(2) from the finger pO(2). Flap was monitored clinically in post-operative period and divided into two groups depending on its survival with Group 1 – dead points and Group 2 – alive points. pO(2) and diff-pO(2) amongst both the groups were compared and found to be statistically different (P = 0.0001). Cut-off value calculated for pO(2) was found to be <86.3 mmHg with a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 89.05%. The difference of >68.503 mmHg of flap pO(2) compared from finger pO(2) was calculated as a cut-off with sensitivity of 94.12 and specificity of 79.60%. CONCLUSIONS: Flap areas having intra-operative pO(2) value <86.3 mmHG have higher chances (60.71%) of getting necrosis later. Similarly, if diff-pO(2) compared to fingertip is >68.5 mmHg, chances of those points getting necrosed in post-operative period are high. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6440342/ /pubmed/30983725 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijps.IJPS_35_17 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Gupta, Ankit
Kumar, Akhil
Gupta, Shyam
Bhattacharaya, Sameek
Jha, Manoj Kumar
Tiwari, Vinay Kumar
Kulal, R. Pradeep
Gupta, Shobhit
Niyazi, Sahil
Intraoperative partial pressure of oxygen measurement to predict flap survival
title Intraoperative partial pressure of oxygen measurement to predict flap survival
title_full Intraoperative partial pressure of oxygen measurement to predict flap survival
title_fullStr Intraoperative partial pressure of oxygen measurement to predict flap survival
title_full_unstemmed Intraoperative partial pressure of oxygen measurement to predict flap survival
title_short Intraoperative partial pressure of oxygen measurement to predict flap survival
title_sort intraoperative partial pressure of oxygen measurement to predict flap survival
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6440342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30983725
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijps.IJPS_35_17
work_keys_str_mv AT guptaankit intraoperativepartialpressureofoxygenmeasurementtopredictflapsurvival
AT kumarakhil intraoperativepartialpressureofoxygenmeasurementtopredictflapsurvival
AT guptashyam intraoperativepartialpressureofoxygenmeasurementtopredictflapsurvival
AT bhattacharayasameek intraoperativepartialpressureofoxygenmeasurementtopredictflapsurvival
AT jhamanojkumar intraoperativepartialpressureofoxygenmeasurementtopredictflapsurvival
AT tiwarivinaykumar intraoperativepartialpressureofoxygenmeasurementtopredictflapsurvival
AT kulalrpradeep intraoperativepartialpressureofoxygenmeasurementtopredictflapsurvival
AT guptashobhit intraoperativepartialpressureofoxygenmeasurementtopredictflapsurvival
AT niyazisahil intraoperativepartialpressureofoxygenmeasurementtopredictflapsurvival