Cargando…
Intraoperative partial pressure of oxygen measurement to predict flap survival
INTRODUCTION: Flap monitoring using partial pressure of oxygen (pO(2)) is a proven modality. Instruments needed are expensive and are not readily available to a clinician. Here, pO(2) of flap has been determined using readily available and cheap methods, and a cut-off value is calculated which helps...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6440342/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30983725 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijps.IJPS_35_17 |
_version_ | 1783407369146859520 |
---|---|
author | Gupta, Ankit Kumar, Akhil Gupta, Shyam Bhattacharaya, Sameek Jha, Manoj Kumar Tiwari, Vinay Kumar Kulal, R. Pradeep Gupta, Shobhit Niyazi, Sahil |
author_facet | Gupta, Ankit Kumar, Akhil Gupta, Shyam Bhattacharaya, Sameek Jha, Manoj Kumar Tiwari, Vinay Kumar Kulal, R. Pradeep Gupta, Shobhit Niyazi, Sahil |
author_sort | Gupta, Ankit |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Flap monitoring using partial pressure of oxygen (pO(2)) is a proven modality. Instruments needed are expensive and are not readily available to a clinician. Here, pO(2) of flap has been determined using readily available and cheap methods, and a cut-off value is calculated which helps in predicting flap outcome. METHODS AND RESULTS: Total 235 points on 84 skin flaps were studied. Capillary blood was collected from flap and fingertip using 1-ml syringes after at least 30 min of flap inset, and pO(2) analysed using blood gas analyser. Fall/change of pO(2) (difference of mean of pO(2) [diff-pO(2)]) was also calculated by subtracting the flap pO(2) from the finger pO(2). Flap was monitored clinically in post-operative period and divided into two groups depending on its survival with Group 1 – dead points and Group 2 – alive points. pO(2) and diff-pO(2) amongst both the groups were compared and found to be statistically different (P = 0.0001). Cut-off value calculated for pO(2) was found to be <86.3 mmHg with a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 89.05%. The difference of >68.503 mmHg of flap pO(2) compared from finger pO(2) was calculated as a cut-off with sensitivity of 94.12 and specificity of 79.60%. CONCLUSIONS: Flap areas having intra-operative pO(2) value <86.3 mmHG have higher chances (60.71%) of getting necrosis later. Similarly, if diff-pO(2) compared to fingertip is >68.5 mmHg, chances of those points getting necrosed in post-operative period are high. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6440342 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64403422019-04-12 Intraoperative partial pressure of oxygen measurement to predict flap survival Gupta, Ankit Kumar, Akhil Gupta, Shyam Bhattacharaya, Sameek Jha, Manoj Kumar Tiwari, Vinay Kumar Kulal, R. Pradeep Gupta, Shobhit Niyazi, Sahil Indian J Plast Surg Original Article INTRODUCTION: Flap monitoring using partial pressure of oxygen (pO(2)) is a proven modality. Instruments needed are expensive and are not readily available to a clinician. Here, pO(2) of flap has been determined using readily available and cheap methods, and a cut-off value is calculated which helps in predicting flap outcome. METHODS AND RESULTS: Total 235 points on 84 skin flaps were studied. Capillary blood was collected from flap and fingertip using 1-ml syringes after at least 30 min of flap inset, and pO(2) analysed using blood gas analyser. Fall/change of pO(2) (difference of mean of pO(2) [diff-pO(2)]) was also calculated by subtracting the flap pO(2) from the finger pO(2). Flap was monitored clinically in post-operative period and divided into two groups depending on its survival with Group 1 – dead points and Group 2 – alive points. pO(2) and diff-pO(2) amongst both the groups were compared and found to be statistically different (P = 0.0001). Cut-off value calculated for pO(2) was found to be <86.3 mmHg with a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 89.05%. The difference of >68.503 mmHg of flap pO(2) compared from finger pO(2) was calculated as a cut-off with sensitivity of 94.12 and specificity of 79.60%. CONCLUSIONS: Flap areas having intra-operative pO(2) value <86.3 mmHG have higher chances (60.71%) of getting necrosis later. Similarly, if diff-pO(2) compared to fingertip is >68.5 mmHg, chances of those points getting necrosed in post-operative period are high. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6440342/ /pubmed/30983725 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijps.IJPS_35_17 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Gupta, Ankit Kumar, Akhil Gupta, Shyam Bhattacharaya, Sameek Jha, Manoj Kumar Tiwari, Vinay Kumar Kulal, R. Pradeep Gupta, Shobhit Niyazi, Sahil Intraoperative partial pressure of oxygen measurement to predict flap survival |
title | Intraoperative partial pressure of oxygen measurement to predict flap survival |
title_full | Intraoperative partial pressure of oxygen measurement to predict flap survival |
title_fullStr | Intraoperative partial pressure of oxygen measurement to predict flap survival |
title_full_unstemmed | Intraoperative partial pressure of oxygen measurement to predict flap survival |
title_short | Intraoperative partial pressure of oxygen measurement to predict flap survival |
title_sort | intraoperative partial pressure of oxygen measurement to predict flap survival |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6440342/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30983725 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijps.IJPS_35_17 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guptaankit intraoperativepartialpressureofoxygenmeasurementtopredictflapsurvival AT kumarakhil intraoperativepartialpressureofoxygenmeasurementtopredictflapsurvival AT guptashyam intraoperativepartialpressureofoxygenmeasurementtopredictflapsurvival AT bhattacharayasameek intraoperativepartialpressureofoxygenmeasurementtopredictflapsurvival AT jhamanojkumar intraoperativepartialpressureofoxygenmeasurementtopredictflapsurvival AT tiwarivinaykumar intraoperativepartialpressureofoxygenmeasurementtopredictflapsurvival AT kulalrpradeep intraoperativepartialpressureofoxygenmeasurementtopredictflapsurvival AT guptashobhit intraoperativepartialpressureofoxygenmeasurementtopredictflapsurvival AT niyazisahil intraoperativepartialpressureofoxygenmeasurementtopredictflapsurvival |