Cargando…

Validation of StrabisPIX, a Mobile Application for Home Measurement of Ocular Alignment

PURPOSE: StrabisPIX is a smartphone application that allows clinicians to prescribe a series of self-obtained images of head position and eye alignment in nine positions of gaze that are uploaded onto a secure platform for clinician review. This study evaluates the clinical utility of this applicati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Phanphruk, Warachaya, Liu, Yingna, Morley, Katharine, Gavin, Jacqueline, Shah, Ankoor S., Hunter, David G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6440486/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30944769
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.8.2.9
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: StrabisPIX is a smartphone application that allows clinicians to prescribe a series of self-obtained images of head position and eye alignment in nine positions of gaze that are uploaded onto a secure platform for clinician review. This study evaluates the clinical utility of this application. METHODS: In this prospective, nonmasked, cross-sectional study, 30 strabismus patients aged ≥2 years were evaluated. Participants received standardized instructions, used StrabisPIX to obtain images as prompted, and completed a satisfaction survey. During the same visit, an orthoptist obtained standard clinical images with a professional camera. All 60 image sets were evaluated by three observers. RESULTS: StrabisPIX image quality was similar to that of clinic photographs. Clinic photographs had significantly higher acceptability for horizontal versions (81% vs. 67%), vertical versions (76% vs. 60%), and head posture (93% vs. 81%). Abnormalities were detected at a similar rate for versions, head posture, eyelid position, and pupil size. StrabisPIX had significantly higher detection of alignment abnormalities (89% vs. 77% for clinical photos). Interrater/intrarater agreements were moderate to high (κ = 0.44–1.00) for all parameters except pupil abnormality, which had poor to fair agreement. Most patients reported that StrabisPIX was easy to learn and use. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, StrabisPIX images had similar quality and were as useful as images obtained in the clinic in detecting abnormalities. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: The StrabisPIX application will enhance the use of telemedicine by allowing physicians to prescribe self-obtained images documenting strabismus.