Cargando…
Ultrasonographic criteria of cesarean scar defect evaluation
Cesarean sections account for approximately 20% of all deliveries worldwide. In Poland, the percentage of women delivering by cesarean section amounts to over 43%. According to studies, the prevalence of cesarean scar defects ranges from 24–70%. Due to the overall cesarean section rate, this is a me...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Exeley Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6440514/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30451411 http://dx.doi.org/10.15557/JoU.2018.0024 |
_version_ | 1783407401776447488 |
---|---|
author | Woźniak, Andrzej Pyra, Krzysztof Tinto, Hugo Rio Woźniak, Sławomir |
author_facet | Woźniak, Andrzej Pyra, Krzysztof Tinto, Hugo Rio Woźniak, Sławomir |
author_sort | Woźniak, Andrzej |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cesarean sections account for approximately 20% of all deliveries worldwide. In Poland, the percentage of women delivering by cesarean section amounts to over 43%. According to studies, the prevalence of cesarean scar defects ranges from 24–70%. Due to the overall cesarean section rate, this is a medical problem affecting a large population of women. In such cases, ultrasonographic evaluation of a cesarean scar reveals a hypoechoic space filled with postmenstrual blood, representing a myometrial tear at the wound site. Such an ultrasound appearance is referred to as a niche, and it forms after a cesarean section at the site of the hysterotomy of the anterior uterine wall, most commonly within the uterine isthmus. Currently, the exact cause of niche formation remains unexplained, yet the risk factors for its development are universally acknowledged. They include the site of hysterotomy, multiple previous cesarean section deliveries, suturing technique and maternal diabetes or smoking. Ultrasound evaluation of the cesarean section scar is an important element of obstetric and gynecologic practice, especially in the case of further pregnancies. It facilitates an early diagnosis of a cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy, and the prediction of the risk for perinatal dehiscence in the case of a vaginal birth after a cesarean section. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6440514 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Exeley Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-64405142019-04-09 Ultrasonographic criteria of cesarean scar defect evaluation Woźniak, Andrzej Pyra, Krzysztof Tinto, Hugo Rio Woźniak, Sławomir J Ultrason Medicine Cesarean sections account for approximately 20% of all deliveries worldwide. In Poland, the percentage of women delivering by cesarean section amounts to over 43%. According to studies, the prevalence of cesarean scar defects ranges from 24–70%. Due to the overall cesarean section rate, this is a medical problem affecting a large population of women. In such cases, ultrasonographic evaluation of a cesarean scar reveals a hypoechoic space filled with postmenstrual blood, representing a myometrial tear at the wound site. Such an ultrasound appearance is referred to as a niche, and it forms after a cesarean section at the site of the hysterotomy of the anterior uterine wall, most commonly within the uterine isthmus. Currently, the exact cause of niche formation remains unexplained, yet the risk factors for its development are universally acknowledged. They include the site of hysterotomy, multiple previous cesarean section deliveries, suturing technique and maternal diabetes or smoking. Ultrasound evaluation of the cesarean section scar is an important element of obstetric and gynecologic practice, especially in the case of further pregnancies. It facilitates an early diagnosis of a cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy, and the prediction of the risk for perinatal dehiscence in the case of a vaginal birth after a cesarean section. Exeley Inc. 2018 2018-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6440514/ /pubmed/30451411 http://dx.doi.org/10.15557/JoU.2018.0024 Text en © Polish Ultrasound Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/cc-by-nc-nd/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/cc-by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial NoDerivatives License (CC BY-NC-ND). Reproduction is permitted for personal, educational, non-commercial use, provided that the original article is in whole, unmodified, and properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Medicine Woźniak, Andrzej Pyra, Krzysztof Tinto, Hugo Rio Woźniak, Sławomir Ultrasonographic criteria of cesarean scar defect evaluation |
title | Ultrasonographic criteria of cesarean scar defect evaluation |
title_full | Ultrasonographic criteria of cesarean scar defect evaluation |
title_fullStr | Ultrasonographic criteria of cesarean scar defect evaluation |
title_full_unstemmed | Ultrasonographic criteria of cesarean scar defect evaluation |
title_short | Ultrasonographic criteria of cesarean scar defect evaluation |
title_sort | ultrasonographic criteria of cesarean scar defect evaluation |
topic | Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6440514/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30451411 http://dx.doi.org/10.15557/JoU.2018.0024 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wozniakandrzej ultrasonographiccriteriaofcesareanscardefectevaluation AT pyrakrzysztof ultrasonographiccriteriaofcesareanscardefectevaluation AT tintohugorio ultrasonographiccriteriaofcesareanscardefectevaluation AT wozniaksławomir ultrasonographiccriteriaofcesareanscardefectevaluation |