Cargando…

Ultrasonographic criteria of cesarean scar defect evaluation

Cesarean sections account for approximately 20% of all deliveries worldwide. In Poland, the percentage of women delivering by cesarean section amounts to over 43%. According to studies, the prevalence of cesarean scar defects ranges from 24–70%. Due to the overall cesarean section rate, this is a me...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Woźniak, Andrzej, Pyra, Krzysztof, Tinto, Hugo Rio, Woźniak, Sławomir
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Exeley Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6440514/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30451411
http://dx.doi.org/10.15557/JoU.2018.0024
_version_ 1783407401776447488
author Woźniak, Andrzej
Pyra, Krzysztof
Tinto, Hugo Rio
Woźniak, Sławomir
author_facet Woźniak, Andrzej
Pyra, Krzysztof
Tinto, Hugo Rio
Woźniak, Sławomir
author_sort Woźniak, Andrzej
collection PubMed
description Cesarean sections account for approximately 20% of all deliveries worldwide. In Poland, the percentage of women delivering by cesarean section amounts to over 43%. According to studies, the prevalence of cesarean scar defects ranges from 24–70%. Due to the overall cesarean section rate, this is a medical problem affecting a large population of women. In such cases, ultrasonographic evaluation of a cesarean scar reveals a hypoechoic space filled with postmenstrual blood, representing a myometrial tear at the wound site. Such an ultrasound appearance is referred to as a niche, and it forms after a cesarean section at the site of the hysterotomy of the anterior uterine wall, most commonly within the uterine isthmus. Currently, the exact cause of niche formation remains unexplained, yet the risk factors for its development are universally acknowledged. They include the site of hysterotomy, multiple previous cesarean section deliveries, suturing technique and maternal diabetes or smoking. Ultrasound evaluation of the cesarean section scar is an important element of obstetric and gynecologic practice, especially in the case of further pregnancies. It facilitates an early diagnosis of a cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy, and the prediction of the risk for perinatal dehiscence in the case of a vaginal birth after a cesarean section.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6440514
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Exeley Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-64405142019-04-09 Ultrasonographic criteria of cesarean scar defect evaluation Woźniak, Andrzej Pyra, Krzysztof Tinto, Hugo Rio Woźniak, Sławomir J Ultrason Medicine Cesarean sections account for approximately 20% of all deliveries worldwide. In Poland, the percentage of women delivering by cesarean section amounts to over 43%. According to studies, the prevalence of cesarean scar defects ranges from 24–70%. Due to the overall cesarean section rate, this is a medical problem affecting a large population of women. In such cases, ultrasonographic evaluation of a cesarean scar reveals a hypoechoic space filled with postmenstrual blood, representing a myometrial tear at the wound site. Such an ultrasound appearance is referred to as a niche, and it forms after a cesarean section at the site of the hysterotomy of the anterior uterine wall, most commonly within the uterine isthmus. Currently, the exact cause of niche formation remains unexplained, yet the risk factors for its development are universally acknowledged. They include the site of hysterotomy, multiple previous cesarean section deliveries, suturing technique and maternal diabetes or smoking. Ultrasound evaluation of the cesarean section scar is an important element of obstetric and gynecologic practice, especially in the case of further pregnancies. It facilitates an early diagnosis of a cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy, and the prediction of the risk for perinatal dehiscence in the case of a vaginal birth after a cesarean section. Exeley Inc. 2018 2018-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6440514/ /pubmed/30451411 http://dx.doi.org/10.15557/JoU.2018.0024 Text en © Polish Ultrasound Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/cc-by-nc-nd/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/cc-by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial NoDerivatives License (CC BY-NC-ND). Reproduction is permitted for personal, educational, non-commercial use, provided that the original article is in whole, unmodified, and properly cited.
spellingShingle Medicine
Woźniak, Andrzej
Pyra, Krzysztof
Tinto, Hugo Rio
Woźniak, Sławomir
Ultrasonographic criteria of cesarean scar defect evaluation
title Ultrasonographic criteria of cesarean scar defect evaluation
title_full Ultrasonographic criteria of cesarean scar defect evaluation
title_fullStr Ultrasonographic criteria of cesarean scar defect evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Ultrasonographic criteria of cesarean scar defect evaluation
title_short Ultrasonographic criteria of cesarean scar defect evaluation
title_sort ultrasonographic criteria of cesarean scar defect evaluation
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6440514/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30451411
http://dx.doi.org/10.15557/JoU.2018.0024
work_keys_str_mv AT wozniakandrzej ultrasonographiccriteriaofcesareanscardefectevaluation
AT pyrakrzysztof ultrasonographiccriteriaofcesareanscardefectevaluation
AT tintohugorio ultrasonographiccriteriaofcesareanscardefectevaluation
AT wozniaksławomir ultrasonographiccriteriaofcesareanscardefectevaluation